Log in

View Full Version : Cindy Sheehan Takes on the Democrats, Hillary Clinton


Psycho4Bud
09-21-2005, 02:01 AM
In an interview after her speech, Sheehan told the Voice she was ??so frustrated? by leading Democrats like Clinton ??who should be leaders on this issue, but are not.? Already, she has set up a future meeting with New York??s junior senator this weekend. And she plans to sit down with the state??s senior senator, Chuck Schumer, too. ??It??s time for them to step up and be the opposition party,? she said. ??This war is not going to end unless the Democrats are on board with us.?
http://villagevoice.com/news/0538,lombardiweb,68015,2.html

Classic!!! This crazy ass disrespectfull bitch is going to try to recruit Hillary? BWWWAAAAAHHHHH!!! I don't think that would quite fit into the plan for a "08" election bid. She better stick with Sharpton, Moore, Jones and all the other asswipes! :D
Stedric
09-21-2005, 02:49 AM
Fuck you and your insensitive fatalistic tactless bullshit. This woman lost her son, she is allowed to be angry. You don't like it? Deal with it. Thats free speech, as much a burden as a blessing.
Psycho4Bud
09-21-2005, 02:56 AM
Fuck you and your insensitive fatalistic tactless bullshit. This woman lost her son, she is allowed to be angry. You don't like it? Deal with it. Thats free speech, as much a burden as a blessing.

Thats true, she does have the right to free speech. Thats a right that her son gave his life for. And I have the right to call her a disrespectfull fucking bitch! Isn't America Great! :D

Oh yea, you got the right to be an asshole also! :D Damn, gotta love it!!!
bhallg2k
09-21-2005, 03:06 AM
Somebody needs to take on the Democrats and prod them into being an opposition party. I'm tired of only hearing GOP voices from Washington.
nicholasstanko
09-21-2005, 03:35 AM
Thats true, she does have the right to free speech. Thats a right that her son gave his life for. And I have the right to call her a disrespectfull fucking bitch! Isn't America Great! :D

Oh yea, you got the right to be an asshole also! :D Damn, gotta love it!!!


so explain again how a couple of a-rabs were going to destroy the constitution and the bill of rights?


were they planning to finishh off the crack in the liberty bell??? :confused:



how are the soldiers protecting freedoms? how would the terrorists have demolished the spirit of america?




cindy's son made a sacrifice to protect america from terrorists...but freedom...i dont get it.
Psycho4Bud
09-21-2005, 01:19 PM
so explain again how a couple of a-rabs were going to destroy the constitution and the bill of rights?

You don't think that they would like to be here setting off their roadside bombs?

were they planning to finishh off the crack in the liberty bell??? :confused:

Could be!!!

how are the soldiers protecting freedoms? how would the terrorists have demolished the spirit of america?

LOL....Democrats have been trying it for years!

cindy's son made a sacrifice to protect america from terrorists...but freedom...i dont get it.

The people of Iraq have a lot more in the line of "freedoms" now than during the Saddam era. And also, by protecting America from terrorists is also protecting our freedoms.
Like the freedom that dumb bitch is enjoying going around the country bad mouthing what her son gave his life for.
amsterdam
09-22-2005, 02:32 PM
nobody ever questioned wether or not sheehan HAD THE RIGHT to say what she said,they questioned wether or not IT WAS RIGHT to say the things she was saying.

and the answer is????whatever happened to her again??oh,,thats right,she is driving around the country with hanoi jane in a bus with personal stylists.hahaha.what a joke.

a bunch of rag tag, workless, leeches of society.
andruejaysin
09-22-2005, 10:03 PM
Somehow I think come 08 all the democrats (and most of the republicans) will be running on a out of Iraq now platform. A shame none of them were that smart back when it mattered.
Psycho4Bud
09-22-2005, 10:55 PM
Somehow I think come 08 all the democrats (and most of the republicans) will be running on a out of Iraq now platform. A shame none of them were that smart back when it mattered.

40-50 thousand home for Christmas this year. I don't think by the "08" elections there will be enough troops left there for anybody to bitch about.
andruejaysin
09-22-2005, 11:53 PM
Really? How many died today? (2) What you are saying is the republican party prefers defeat to a continuation of the war. Probably smart politically, but somehow I don't believe that is the point you wish to argue.
Psycho4Bud
09-23-2005, 12:29 AM
Really? How many died today? (2) What you are saying is the republican party prefers defeat to a continuation of the war. Probably smart politically, but somehow I don't believe that is the point you wish to argue.

The Iraqi army has been handed over control of Najaf, they were the major force,5000 out of 8500, that stormed Tal Afar. They are slowly starting to get trained to a point where they can take control.
Defeat? Nope, right on track!
andruejaysin
09-23-2005, 01:11 AM
Right on track to civil war, which is now the goal of the US, rather that something to be avoided. They can take over control of Najaf, holy city of the shia?, sure! OK, when will they be able to take over control of Ramadi, or Falluja, or Baghdad for that fucking matter? 12th of never, nor do they want to! Because what you are missing is that the MAJORITY wants to see Iraq broken up.
nicholasstanko
09-23-2005, 02:12 AM
40-50 thousand home for Christmas this year. I don't think by the "08" elections there will be enough troops left there for anybody to bitch about.


i heard that pitch in 2004 and 2003...
Psycho4Bud
09-23-2005, 03:37 AM
i heard that pitch in 2004 and 2003...

You must have got that from prisonplanet! LOL.....We invaded end of 03, by the end of 04 we just contained, or Sistani contained, Al-Sadr. Must be some goooood shit! :D
nicholasstanko
09-24-2005, 02:16 AM
You must have got that from prisonplanet! LOL.....We invaded end of 03, by the end of 04 we just contained, or Sistani contained, Al-Sadr. Must be some goooood shit! :D

yeh, but i heard rummy himself say that they would probably be able to reduce troop levels by end of 2003...and cheny in 2004...


you must be on some good shit if you believed them and forgot about it when it didnt happen...too busy flag waving i guess
Psycho4Bud
09-24-2005, 02:52 PM
yeh, but i heard rummy himself say that they would probably be able to reduce troop levels by end of 2003...and cheny in 2004...


you must be on some good shit if you believed them and forgot about it when it didnt happen...too busy flag waving i guess

Show me the links, prove me wrong.

Flag wavin'?
GOD BLESS AMERICA!!! :D