Log in

View Full Version : Under 18 Year Olds Having Sex



Cheery Cherry
07-07-2005, 07:14 PM
Seriously, I would like to know, if you are under the age of 18 or were under the age of 18 and have/had sex, why do/did you, besides the obvious answer of because it feels/felt good? What, if anything, could have prevented you from having sex at an early age? Do you believe that the media has anything to do with it? Could your parents or adults in your life could've said/done anything to make you wait? If so, what could they have said or done?

infamousg8845
07-07-2005, 08:00 PM
i had sex when i was 15 but i had anal sex when i was 14.. .go figure... the girl didnt wanna take a chance of gettin pregnant so she sed put it in my ass and i did.... i dont think the media has anything to do with it.. But maybe watchin porn does lol.. And no my parents culdnt hav sed anything to stop me from doing it. And i did it cause i liked the girl and i wanted to try it out.. I dont regret doing it

Creeper
07-08-2005, 02:40 AM
I was 13 when I did it, and its cause I had the opportunity and I took it. I prolly shouldnt have done it cause i felt sort of wierd afterwards but all in all, it was prolly cause I just moved to a new school and wanted to look like a hotshot.

jacquelyne
07-08-2005, 03:22 AM
I did it when i was 17 for the first time.I had been with my bf for about 6 mths and it just happened it was all good and felt right at the time as i did stay with him for almost 5 years.None of my friends at school had sex by then i was the first one.You wouldnt believe this but i also got caught by my mum the first time(not in the act) she found the condom the silly bugger put it under the bed and when she was cleaning she found it i was so very very embarresed and she took me to the doctor and made me get on birth control.

xReLiNqUiShLoVe
07-08-2005, 04:37 AM
Eh, I was 13.. That's fucked up, but I was stupid. No one could have stopped me at the time. I do regret it now, being a BIT older.. but it makes no difference.

BalliN
07-08-2005, 05:32 AM
i love girls girls girls girls

girls i do adore...

gothicblood
07-08-2005, 02:19 PM
i'd rather wait till i'm 16 so its at least legal lol. one of my friends is preganant and shes 14. whore... :rolleyes:

Deborah
07-08-2005, 02:39 PM
I was 17 and only did it from the pressure that the boy friend was giving me and then got PG...That was back in the 70's. To many reasons not to then to do it now. Sex isnt everything bit to guys it usually is. Not meaning anything bad by that but thats the way guys think. They think of sex like every so many seconds. They cant help it. Young boys especially cant help it anf they want to act on it and thats not good.

slipknotpsycho
07-08-2005, 02:49 PM
actually, i don't think about it that much, believe it or not. have a high as fuck sex drive but never really just think about it. i'd say maybe at most every hour or two i'd have a sexual thought

Button Basher
07-08-2005, 03:21 PM
Harsh. My girlfriend waited 6 months for me to sleep with her. I was still reading Asterix when everyone around me was going down on eachother.

Cheery Cherry
07-08-2005, 08:30 PM
The reason I ask the question is because I am part of a research team that basically is trying to work with parents in my community, who have teenage children, to prevent teenage pregnancies. I think it helps to talk with parents, but I really feel that it would help more if we talked with teens also. Because the research team wants to focus more on empowering parents and help parents to talk with their teens that I don't get to go around talking with teens. Not that I want to push my beliefs or values on the teenagers but I was curious how one could (if possible) go about preventing teenage pregnancies besides offering condoms/protection. I think the research team is pushing abstinence but I feel that it's unrealistic.

I thought that it would help me better if I understood why. I mean, I know why I had sex at 15 years of age but my reasons can be different from another teenager's/person's.

Thanks for responding...some interesting replies! :)

DonnieDarko
07-08-2005, 10:20 PM
Keep working at it Cheery. My own opinion is that we (parents and media) have to encourage boy-girl "friendships" during the years before age 18. Slow down the relationship progression, and encourage more light dating with different people throughout the teen years. This may require parents to allow (encourage ?) sexual alternatives to intercourse .... we know what they are ..... and to make the consequences of unwanted pregnancies crystal clear , especially to the boys.

I do think that progress can be made in this area. Abstainance until marriage is no longer realistic, but there can be some safer alternatives that can satisfy the multitudes of sexually curious teens.

crystal clear pepsi
07-09-2005, 03:01 AM
i love girls girls girls girls

girls i do adore...


i love to CUM , CUM , CUM , CUM ,CUM
.
.
CUMMIN' I do Adore

looseends
07-10-2005, 04:55 PM
i was 17 when i had first had sex with my boyfriend. it was a really beautiful experience. and i have to realize that when my daughters are a bit older i have to inform them as much as possible on sex. we as parents can't shy away from teaching our young ones about what goes on around us. there's too much going on where we have to get to ours kids first before anyone else does.

mlleyeuxbleus
07-10-2005, 08:27 PM
DonnieDarko... you have completely hit it on the head!!! It seems as though more & more young teens are ensconcing themselves in sort of "mini-marriages", where they are declaring their undying & eternal love, & have this strict commitment to each other. When as we get older we realize that dating is a learning experience, & you don't even know *yourself* totally until you finish growing up. Then we see that the odds of two 14-yr. olds truly being together forever are pretty much nil. My point is that by making things sooo serious at that young age, they're only setting themselves up for major heartbreak & emotional trauma. I would love to see a cultural shift away from that, & just kids being kids again. Exploring the dating scene is one thing, but developing super-glued bonds at a young age just doesn't seem healthy.

Cheery, I think what you're doing is great. I would also add that there needs to be an emphasis on safer sex, EVEN when a guy & a gal are in an 'exclusive' relationship. I don't care how exclusive you think it is, so many people are into sneaking around (it's freaking glorified in so much popular music, how sad), that it's just ridiculous to think 'oh, he's my boyfriend, so he's safe.' There needs to be a tactful way to give them a wakeup call from this dangerous naivete, without implying that their partner is an outright cheating bastard (as that would only make them defensive).

As for my first sexual experience, I was 17. First boyfriend (had just moved out of my mom's, which was very strict & religious, so no dating allowed til then), first kiss, first everything. We had dated for a few months & made out a lot, & finally one afternoon decided to go for it. It was great til his dad came home, lol. Luckily he had really cool parents. Literally the next day I went to Family Planning & got my exam & went on the pill. I figured if I was doing it, I wanted to do it right. I think going on the pill also felt 'grown-up', which was cool at the time, lol.

GHoSToKeR
07-10-2005, 10:33 PM
I had sex long before I turned 18. I didn't at the time (and I don't now) think there should be any age restrictions when it comes (no pun intended) to sex. This doesn't mean that I think 10, 11, 12 year olds should be having sex, but I do realise that every single person matures, both mentally and physically, at different speeds.

My main reason for thinking there should be no age restrictions for sex is that I strongly believe that the law should not be able to dictate things like this. Things such as sexual orientation or sexual prolificacy should be for each individual - or each individuals respective guardian - should decide. The same applies to drug laws - whether I think each particular drug is good or bad I still think that it should be up to each individual to decide if they want to take them or not, and that decision should not be made for anybody.

I believe that the only way to ever tackle things such as drug abuse or underage sex is education. Banning these things, or placing restrictions on them will not stop the problem, only sweep it under the rug, so to speak. Teaching children the ins and outs (again, no pun intended) of sex honestly and openly is the only way for them to learn the dangers that can come from having unprotected sex. Stop acting like sex is a bad thing and your kids will stop acting like they're not having sex. They'll be more open and honest with you and you can give them advice they will actually listen to, instead of treating sex as something you should always keep secret until your child reaches 18.

GHoSToKeR
07-10-2005, 10:36 PM
DonnieDarko... you have completely hit it on the head!!! It seems as though more & more young teens are ensconcing themselves in sort of "mini-marriages", where they are declaring their undying & eternal love, & have this strict commitment to each other. When as we get older we realize that dating is a learning experience, & you don't even know *yourself* totally until you finish growing up. Then we see that the odds of two 14-yr. olds truly being together forever are pretty much nil. My point is that by making things sooo serious at that young age, they're only setting themselves up for major heartbreak & emotional trauma. I would love to see a cultural shift away from that, & just kids being kids again. Exploring the dating scene is one thing, but developing super-glued bonds at a young age just doesn't seem healthy.
Completely agree. But I think the only reason for these "mini-marriages" is because society as a whole puts so much emphasis on the need to find a partner, settle down and get married. Many adults believe that you cannot survive without a partner, and some act as if their lives are ruined until they find one. Alot of people believe that having a partner is essential to having a good life... kids see this and naturally they mimick it.

MeatRulz
07-10-2005, 10:40 PM
hmm well il put the normal answer raging hormones

xReLiNqUiShLoVe
07-10-2005, 11:29 PM
Honestly, from a teenagers perspective. I think everything you're all saying is unrealistic. I'm one of the more, what's the way to say it, "senseable" teens? By telling teenagers what to do, it only makes it worse. I know all sort of teens. The only teens that don't disobey their parents constantly are the ones who don't exist, ha. There's no such thing as a good kid/teen anymore. No I don't think teens should be having sex and whatnot. It doesn't change what we're going to do, though. By telling a teen they can't have a relationship, it will only make them want one more, and go to a further extent to get it. I know MANY girls with children under the age of 16. Every one of them has told me how their parents tried to be controlling and keep them away from guys. So they went for the "bad boys" or should we say, "assholes." The guys that say "we don't need a condom, baby, I love you" just because they don't feel like spending like, what, 12 dollars or so on a box of condoms? The media has NOTHING to do with it, and parents cannot control it. If anything parents make it worse. The main influence on that choice is other teenagers. There's really absolutely nothing you can do it. I've told many people, and I'll keep telling people, I'm afraid for my generation. We'll survive, though, same as all the ones in the past. This isn't the biggest problem they've had. Worry about drugs more. Honestly, a child is a gift regardless of who it comes from or how it came about. It's a life struggle from then on for a teenager, but that's their fault. They'll either learn, or be screwed up.

Best bet, worry about getting the babies from the teenagers who CAN'T take care of them, and put them in the hands of decent people. Not people who will rape and abuse them, possibley giving them an even worse life than they could have ever possibley had with the biological parents.

It works like drugs, though. Even the smartest kids are going to make mistakes. Regardless of what ANYONE does, it WILL happen. All you can do is take care of them when it does happen.

xReLiNqUiShLoVe
07-10-2005, 11:38 PM
Just a few typographical errors, fixing them since it wouldn't let me edit my post.

I said: There's really absolutely nothing you can do it.
"There's really absolutely nothing you can do."

I also said: This isn't the biggest problem they've had. Worry about drugs more.
"There have been bigger problems in the past."

Forget the "Worry about drugs more." That was a different thought, I just didn't delete it accidentally.

xReLiNqUiShLoVe
07-10-2005, 11:43 PM
I had sex long before I turned 18. I didn't at the time (and I don't now) think there should be any age restrictions when it comes (no pun intended) to sex. This doesn't mean that I think 10, 11, 12 year olds should be having sex, but I do realise that every single person matures, both mentally and physically, at different speeds.

My main reason for thinking there should be no age restrictions for sex is that I strongly believe that the law should not be able to dictate things like this. Things such as sexual orientation or sexual prolificacy should be for each individual - or each individuals respective guardian - should decide. The same applies to drug laws - whether I think each particular drug is good or bad I still think that it should be up to each individual to decide if they want to take them or not, and that decision should not be made for anybody.

I believe that the only way to ever tackle things such as drug abuse or underage sex is education. Banning these things, or placing restrictions on them will not stop the problem, only sweep it under the rug, so to speak. Teaching children the ins and outs (again, no pun intended) of sex honestly and openly is the only way for them to learn the dangers that can come from having unprotected sex. Stop acting like sex is a bad thing and your kids will stop acting like they're not having sex. They'll be more open and honest with you and you can give them advice they will actually listen to, instead of treating sex as something you should always keep secret until your child reaches 18.

Well, you've got the idea. Sorry, I didn't read this first.


And about the "mini-marriage" thing. If anything support it, 'cause you can't stop it. It's going to be what it is. If they're going to have sex anyway, hope it's only with only one person, not a lot of people. I know a girl who is 15 and has slept with 12 guys, and 4 girls. I also know two 16 year olds that have been together since they were 13 and have only slept with each other.

Sentinel
07-11-2005, 12:00 AM
GothicBlood- Wait until your 16 so its legal? wtf? Is it just me or has the government actually made a law on having sex? Gothicblood is the same person who was asking about smoking incense though...

gothicblood
07-11-2005, 04:21 PM
theres no point rushing into things your not ready for lol. isn't it law cuz your bodys not ready for sex before your 16 and it still needs to like develop and stuff. i was just curious about the insence thing and that was ages ago.

lightning
07-21-2005, 10:22 PM
I started having sex at 14 and had a son by 17(we got married) and a little girl at 19 and devorced(not spelled right) at 23. Now at 37 I'm going to be a grandpa my son(he is 20) and his wife are going to have a boy. I know it was wrong to have sex that earily and getting married that young made life very hard at times but I don't know if I would change anything because i have 2 great kids and about to have a grandson and I'm young enough to enjoy it.

420purplehaze420
07-21-2005, 10:39 PM
yeah relinquishlove makes some good points, if you tell teenagers to wait until there older for sex its not gunna make a bit of difference the only real thing to prevent teenage pregnancy is the pill being a teenager the media and my parents have absolutely nothing to do with my sex life, i do it because i want to i dont know if all the girls ive had sex were on birth control most likely werent but i used a condom everytime and there hasnt been any babies yet so im going to continue to do it

senoirsalsa
07-22-2005, 06:14 AM
this is really a question for girls,im 13 im a guy i lost it to my current gf,for guys if a pussy will let em in there ALL over it,sloppy teenage style lol,but i know quite a few girls who gave blowjobs in 6thgrade becuase there boyfriends were demanding and they really loved them,this is what pushed most girls into it around here,the boyfriend demands it or you break up and the girl doesnt want that so they give in

ontariogrower
07-22-2005, 08:35 AM
I lost my virginity when I was 17. I met a girl on the internet and flew out thousands of km away to meet her and stayed with her for a week. I fucked her mind you I had fucking hardness problems so she was like insulted. lol. I don't count that time. I had real sex with my other gf when i was 17 and it just happened because we were horny. I did it because I was horny as fuck and everyone around me was having it and i wanted to get my fuck on! Nothing would have stopped me, cuz she had a wicked body and a tight 14 year old pussy! HAHAHA *coughs*........This happened in my dreams.

NightProwler
07-23-2005, 05:06 AM
im 14 years old and i had sex with this chick because she was realllly sexy!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

JackNoble
08-06-2005, 07:45 AM
16, two partners. For some of my buddies it's merely an activity engaged in to enjoy and a skill to master. Used to be really romantic but I'm starting to feel the same way; falling in love is an arduous task.

robert42
08-06-2005, 10:29 AM
i started havin sex when i was about 15 . age is a number. :p

Not Enough Herb
08-08-2005, 07:41 AM
i did it at 16

i was horny

nuff said

later

Not Enough Herb
08-08-2005, 07:57 AM
ok i didnt really read the post before but now i have and i have a few things to say:

gothicblood- ok i have no clue what ur on but i suggest ur go cold turkey for a bit...ur body isnt developed at 16...kids have sex at 12....stop smoking insence!

about mini marriages...ive been with my gf for about 6 months....i love her dearly and hopefully its mutual but just because were in love doesnt mean were gonna settle down and get married...were two kids having fun..

also, safe sex and what not...im not really sure i think it depends on the couple...me and my gf have been having unprotected sex for 3 months now and no pregnancies...so i think it depends on the ppl really..yes i no this is stupid but i dont really care because if sumthing happens i will be man enough to own up to my mistakes.

so, in closing...fuck like rabbits and dont look back

later

MrsDarkIdol
08-08-2005, 09:17 AM
Your definitely right on the abstinence message being unrealistic. No matter what you try teens are going to have sex. It's part of nature and our cylces, it's an age old instinct to say the least.
So you can tell them till your blue in the face not to have sex, but they will.
However, there is that huge problem of teen pregnancy then that comes along with this.
It seems to me the best thing we could do is for parents to open the lines of communication. Ensure that your child is not going to be to embaressed or afraid of getting into trouble to talk to you. Because then if they think they can't go to you for all those intimate details and questions(no matter how horrowing an experience it may be for the parent) they then go to peers and get all the facts jumbled up.

Well I feel like i've just repeated what everyone else has been saying :o
Oh well , not deleting all this :)

Fengzi
08-08-2005, 05:10 PM
Not only is the abstinence mesage unrealistic, in my experience it seems to have the opposite effect. I went to a private Catholic school in Florida for my freshman and sophmore years of highschool. Obviously they preached abstinence, pre-marital sex is a sin, blah blah blah. Well, all I can say is Catholic girls were easy. Within the first two months of my freshman year I had lost my virginity. I was 13yo then and by the time I was 15 I had had sex with 3 different girls plus had gotten bjs from 2 more.

Just before the start of my Junior year my family moved to the San Francisco Bay area where I went to a public school. Talk about a contrast, going from the conservative South to probably the most liberal area in the U.S.. Funny thing was, I didn't get laid for my entire junior year. Not that I didn't try. I was reasonably popular and went out with a few different girls but for some reason they just didn't want to have sex :confused:

I thought it must just be some weird California thing. Then just after the start of my senior year my family moved again, this time to Chicago. Once again I went to a public school, and like in California, the girls just weren't all that easy. Out of the 4 or so girls I dated I was only able to get one into bed and that was only after a few dates and a few drinks.

Maybe there were other factors involved but I can't help beleive that the hard core anti-sex message of the Catholic system is what led to my good luck those forst two years of high school. Nothing was taught about sex other than it was forbidden and what's more tempting that forbidden fruit?

I think education is the best way to prevent teen-age pregnancies. Don't tell them it's wrong but make sure they completely understand the consequences
I don't know what they're teaching in the schools these days but my suggestion is to have them all watch a movie showing a woman giving birth, complete with screams and all the assorted bodily fluids that are involved. Then have the movie continue with graphic depictions of STD's- herpes sores, leaking pus etc. At the very end have a statement "It can all be prevented with" and show a condom. If it doesn't stop them from having sex maybe at least it'll scare them into safe sex.

Cheery Cherry
08-08-2005, 05:41 PM
I think education is the best way to prevent teen-age pregnancies. Don't tell them it's wrong but make sure they completely understand the consequences
I don't know what they're teaching in the schools these days but my suggestion is to have them all watch a movie showing a woman giving birth, complete with screams and all the assorted bodily fluids that are involved. Then have the movie continue with graphic depictions of STD's- herpes sores, leaking pus etc. At the very end have a statement "It can all be prevented with" and show a condom. If it doesn't stop them from having sex maybe at least it'll scare them into safe sex.

Wow, Fengzi, after seeing a movie like the one you described, I think every girl would be afraid to have sex :p . You make an interesting observation. I also believe that too much preaching about abstinence would make teens have sex more but what do I know...I have a doctor (an expert in this subject) as my boss telling me what I should say. Education IS the key!

I'm really interested in hearing about you moving so much during your teen years as I moved around a lot too but that's off topic so I'll have to catch ya some other time ;) .

midnitejoker77
08-09-2005, 05:58 PM
I was 16. The day before "it" happend, I so freaked my mom out by asking "what's sex like?". All I got was a "don't do it!" I think if her answer would have been somewhat more (ok how would you answer a 16 yr old who asked you that?) I wouldn't have, at least not then. After my bf and I did, I was very unimpressed, won't go into details, but now that I am older I know why. I think talking to kids is the best thing you got, All of us were young and dumb once and that is when this happens. So information is the key feed it to them over and over the nagging does sink in. I had all the information the school was giving including the birthing video, it had no influence on me, I needed to hear it on a more personal level (from my mom).

RedRainDrop
08-09-2005, 07:09 PM
im 16, and i still haven't plunged the hole yet :(

mellow mood
08-09-2005, 07:14 PM
yea maybe parents dont talk enough bout that stuff. i personnally think theres no problem about having sex before 18. actually i think 15 is maybe the age to start (if you are already mature a bit).

i think the key is just to inform the kids about how to avoid pregancy, not to fuckin encourage abstinence just like this stupid Mr. Bush is doin.

spliffstar22
08-10-2005, 02:42 PM
I lost it when I was 15, had 8 partners or so since. about 4 were one-time things, and 4 were mini relationships lol

partyguy420
08-11-2005, 11:39 AM
it was when i was 15... and im 15.5 now... but anyways.. no it had nothin to do with the media... and no... my mom atualy told me when i was in the 6th grade, that she didnt want me having sex. but if i was going to to that i should starp up, and she told me that if the ppls at the store didnt sell me rubbers that she would go and get them for me

Not Enough Herb
08-14-2005, 07:45 AM
^ thats what more parents should be like

not screaming at you for your choice...but encouraging u to be safe

my mom always tells me to wrap the old fella up if im having sex

good advice

later

vermillion
08-14-2005, 01:03 PM
haha well i did at 16 thought i was in love, we were goin out for 6 months before we did dunno it was a spur of the moment thing, i dont think that there is a way of preventing it, i'd just give ur kids condoms, warn them excessively on STD's, i really didnt give a shit, just worried bout getting her pregnant, tell em that the pull out method isnt ok, its not fun counting down the days till her period (or having her be 5 days late :/) I would really try to drill the topic of std's into their heads, show them picrures if u hafta

chosen1
08-14-2005, 05:33 PM
I had sex long before I turned 18. I didn't at the time (and I don't now) think there should be any age restrictions when it comes (no pun intended) to sex. This doesn't mean that I think 10, 11, 12 year olds should be having sex, but I do realise that every single person matures, both mentally and physically, at different speeds.

My main reason for thinking there should be no age restrictions for sex is that I strongly believe that the law should not be able to dictate things like this. Things such as sexual orientation or sexual prolificacy should be for each individual - or each individuals respective guardian - should decide. The same applies to drug laws - whether I think each particular drug is good or bad I still think that it should be up to each individual to decide if they want to take them or not, and that decision should not be made for anybody.

I believe that the only way to ever tackle things such as drug abuse or underage sex is education. Banning these things, or placing restrictions on them will not stop the problem, only sweep it under the rug, so to speak. Teaching children the ins and outs (again, no pun intended) of sex honestly and openly is the only way for them to learn the dangers that can come from having unprotected sex. Stop acting like sex is a bad thing and your kids will stop acting like they're not having sex. They'll be more open and honest with you and you can give them advice they will actually listen to, instead of treating sex as something you should always keep secret until your child reaches 18.

Ok, your chatting air. If there were no age restrictions then dirty 60year old peadophiles would be molesting 10 year olds and blagging that they consented to it. Sorry but i do NOT agree with you, as im not yet 16 untill October i would prefer to just do it behind closed doors where the law never need find out

beachguy in thongs
08-14-2005, 06:22 PM
From now on, Congress is passing a law to send everyone, who gets a girl pregnant,or gets pregnant, under the age of 18 to Greenland.

OPM
08-14-2005, 10:15 PM
One of the more effective presentations I heard about recently was when a young teenage mother spoke in front of a class of middle school students. She told them how the baby had enhanced, as well as, hindered her life. She gave examples like depending on her parents to feed the baby and how badly it made her feel. She talked about how she had to postpone some of her dreams for her child.
By the way, Cheery, bokuwa, Naluman no tomodachi dessu. Ima Hawaii de gakko sensei desu. Yokkatara, email okutte kuremasuka?
[email protected]

Mojavpa
08-14-2005, 10:45 PM
Ok, your chatting air. If there were no age restrictions then dirty 60year old peadophiles would be molesting 10 year olds and blagging that they consented to it. Sorry but i do NOT agree with you, as im not yet 16 untill October i would prefer to just do it behind closed doors where the law never need find out

Yeah, its a difficult question because if there is an age restriction, what should it be? 15? 14? If a girl has gone through puberty at 9 and has had "consensual" sex with a 21 year old, how should the law handle that?

smokinindausa
08-14-2005, 10:47 PM
if ur fukkin a dog, do you count its age in dog years or human???? Cuz i think its ok to fuk a 1 yr old puppy, cuz hes like 20 in dog yearz. kk thx

Not Enough Herb
08-15-2005, 07:30 AM
^ lmao thats not right period

and its 7 yrs old

later

powair
08-15-2005, 09:31 PM
I'm 17 and I have sex because i want to. its really that simple. nothing could have prevented me i dont think. ive been called a nympho heh.

However, I met my boyfriend of now 5 months ago and I find myself wishing that i had never slept with anyone else but him. I do regret that I had casual sex with a lot of people (19 partners and I only loved one, the current). It is so much better with someone you love.

tokosan
08-18-2005, 08:12 AM
if ur fukkin a dog, do you count its age in dog years or human???? Cuz i think its ok to fuk a 1 yr old puppy, cuz hes like 20 in dog yearz. kk thx


hahahhahhah WTF!!! Bestiality is gross!!! EWWWWWWWWWWWWW

everyone point and laugh at the perv/wierdo!

AHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAH!

trippruss
08-18-2005, 02:10 PM
our experiences in life make us who we are. i'm a 40yr male who started having sex when i was 13-14yrs. way too young, but it's each life experience that makes us who we are & now my 17yr boy is WAY

trippruss
08-18-2005, 02:16 PM
too serious about his present girlfriend & that makes me worry. these mini-marriages have to be stopped. even my 14yr has been pressured into this whole "relationship" thing when they should be having fun. my older boy is always miserable & jealous about everything & anyone, bad scene. younger one is alittle more secure in himself so his "girlfriends" aren't as pushy. we need as parents to help develop self-esteem so that our kids aren't so f-in' needy. i knew girls in school that had such a need for attention that they would practically screw anyone just to feel good.

WalkaWalka
08-20-2005, 05:41 AM
Ok so parents plz crack down on this whole relationship thing
Becuase IT IS FUCKING UP my fun I mean you have to lie to like 30 people just to have a girlfriend. The whole godamn school thinks like that. And if you dont make commitments your get slandered the girls get called whores and such.

slipknotpsycho
08-20-2005, 06:00 AM
personally, even as parents i dont' see how you can feel it's right to tell your kids they can't have relationships at the age you had them. i've never liked parents in general because of the whole damned double standard thing. they always seem to think that just because they've went through it, seen the bad shit that comes along with it, it's ok to go and tell their kids they're not allowed to do it, just because "they don't want them to go down the same road they did" if you really cared you'd stop ordering your kids around and start talking to them, INFORMING them of what they're in for, instead of just saying something like "you're not old enough, you aren't responsible enough, and i've been there done that... i know where it takes you" with most kids these days ordering them only gets you the opposite effect of what you wish. your kids are people too, and they are going to have to make mistakes to learn from. don't get me wrong i'm not saying you should go out and encourage them to have sex, kill, and the like. i'm just saying, actually talk to them and let them know what's up and the possible reprecussions. for as long as i can remember, parents to me have seemed nothing more than an older person on a power trip.

firsttimefarmer
08-22-2005, 09:22 PM
i'd rather wait till i'm 16 so its at least legal lol. one of my friends is preganant and shes 14. whore... :rolleyes:
thats not a very nice thing to say, :confused: Why not try to be nice?

weirdo79
08-22-2005, 09:42 PM
lol first time I was thinking the same thing, I wouldnt want to be gothicblood's "friend" sounds like she's really nice to em :). Nothing better than being called down by your friends for stereotypical response where would her friend have been male he'de have been a stud......