medical MJ is a federal crime now?

[ScarlettCrush]

I see on the news that our government is passing a law making medical mj ilegal and overriding individual states rights...am I having a nightmare? What is happening?

[mono repin]

Afraid so...

http://www.chron.com/cs/CDA/ssistory.mpl/nation/3214058

Anyone on the board lose their rights?

[KronicKing]

acctualy not much will change,it just means the court says its still illeagal for now but the state laws are still in effect

[llamaman666]

I don't think I'm changing, but if Alaska's law is overruled I say "Look at Canada goddamnit! Not just them look at tiny TINY Holland. How the fuck can America be looking worse and less for its own constitution. The BILL OF RIGHTS c'mon. "AND THE PURSUIT OF HAPPINESS" now how can these sufering people do THAT. And hell, how will I! I have used it medicinly, recreationally more no doubt. But my use started because I was depressed and when I don't use it I am horrible. So I guess I NEED it to support me. I bet theres a good 1 or 2 million people in America who NEED it. That's actually and underestimate. Almost 6 percent of America is currently a daily toker with 22 percent having used it in the past year. Im sure if you asked "have you ever?" to America that answer would come in at around the 80 percent mark, and even higher for federal politicians as they almost exclusivly come from wealthier families and would more likely have marijuana availible at a young age than people in lower middle class.

[Iolaus420]

Here's NORML's take on the whole thing. The Supreme Court's decision isn't neccesarily a bad thing, as long as the the States' Rights to Medical Marijuana Act passes. I don't mean to sound like a nag, but any US voters interested in this issue really should contact their representatives about this bill. You can go to the NORML website and with just a few clicks a pre-written email will be on its way. www.norml.org


NORML Comments On Pending Supreme Court Medical Cannabis Ruling

Washington, DC: The US Supreme Court could rule as early as next week on whether to uphold a Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals decision which found that the federal prosecution of patients who cultivate and possess marijuana for their own medicinal use is an unconstitutional exercise of Congress' Commerce Clause authority.
The Ninth Circuit ruled 2-1 in December 2003 that "the intrastate, non-commercial cultivation, possession and use of marijuana for personal medical purposes on the advice of a physician - is, in fact, different in kind from drug trafficking," and issued an injunction barring the US Justice Department from taking legal action against the appellants, California medical cannabis patients Angel McClary Raich and Diane Monson, for violating the federal Controlled Substances Act. The Justice Department appealed that decision to the Supreme Court, which heard oral arguments in the case last November.
"Either way the Court rules, this decision is essentially a 'win-win' for marijuana-law reform advocates," NORML Executive Director Allen St. Pierre said. "If the Court upholds the Ninth Circuit decision, then it will affirm the notion that the non-commercial, intrastate possession and use of medicinal cannabis is solely a matter of state, not federal law.
"However, if the Court reverses the Ninth Circuit's opinion, the bottom line is that state and local laws protecting medicinal cannabis patients and their physicians remain in place and are unaffected by this ruling. The federal government can choose to continue to waste taxpayers' dollars and undermine states' rights by arbitrarily raiding the homes of seriously ill patients who possess and use medical cannabis in compliance with state law, or they can choose more worthwhile priorities, like national security and prosecuting violent criminals."
St. Pierre said that Congress will likely vote later this month on a bipartisan amendment sponsored by Dana Rohrabacher (R-CA) and Maurice Hinchey (D-NY) that would prohibit the federal government from spending taxpayers' dollars to prosecute patients who comply with their state's medical marijuana laws.
Also pending in Congress is House Bill HR 2087, "the States' Rights to Medical Marijuana Act," sponsored by Reps. Barney Frank (D-MA), Ron Paul (R-TX), Sam Farr (D-CA), Rohrabacher, and Hinchey, along with 31 co-sponsors, which would reclassify marijuana under federal law to recognize its medical utility and enable physicians to legally prescribe it under controlled circumstances.
"Regardless of which way the Supreme Court rules in this case, it remains pivotal that Congress amend federal law to properly recognize cannabis' therapeutic utility," St. Pierre said. "Throughout our history, the public has looked to state legislatures and Congress - not the courts
- to be the architects of public policy. With 80 percent of Americans as well as numerous health organizations, including the American Nurses Association and the American Public Health Association, in favor of legalizing the physician-supervised use of medicinal cannabis, it's time for the federal government to butt out of doctors' decisions regarding which medicine is the most safe and effective for their patients."
For more information, please contact either Allen St. Pierre or NORML Legal Counsel Keith Stroup at (202) 483-5500. Additional background information regarding this case is available online at: http://angeljustice.org

[looseends]

...as i said before...what a lovely country we live in

[Dick Justice]

Take THAT, people who are ill!

[XTC]

acctualy not much will change,it just means the court says its still illeagal for now but the state laws are still in effect

Actually they OVER RULED the state laws. :eek: It truly is sad when a MS or Cancer patient is labeld a criminal in society.

[BUZz UK]

Take THAT, people who are ill!
lol, evidently that's what the 'powers that be' are thinkin!

[hipEstoner]

this is one fucked up country

[BUZz UK]

this is one fucked up country
it's a whole fucked up world man...

[hipEstoner]

it's a whole fucked up world man...
oops,, forgot to put world ,, lol

[ScarlettCrush]

I thought it was up to the people to decide what they wanted, and that is why we have state laws, I can't beleive this much of my freedom is being taken away with little to nothing I can do about it. I am tired of having old men represent me, I want young blood, or at least younger blood, where are all the old hippys?
The one thing I was looking forward too was moving to a state that allows medical use...now what? this sucks.