WAITING FOR THE NOOSE!!

[amsterdam]

The noose beckons for the worlds most notorious prisoner as he whiles away his last days in an Iraqi jail. :D

[amsterdam]

im sure the typical,"thats not fair,that wasnt nice crowd," will be out soon.

more horrific torture pictures!!

[amsterdam]

we should stop protecting that guy and release him out on the street to the general public dressed as is.

[XTC]

It's Toture I say, They're giving him Gray Jeans! OMG!

[amsterdam]

hahahaha,good one.

[Button Basher]

Yeah, I read that Sun today :cool: , was a good laugh.

The only luxury they are giving him is black hair dye. Why the fuck are they even doing that?

[pisshead]

i always look at the other hand when they flash crap like this in front of us. if the mainstream is focusing on something as stupid as saddam wearing underwear...you can be sure something else 1000 times more important is happening...

like congress trying to get through more of patriot act II, further destroying the bill of rights and constitution. i know i know, not as important.

and yes, i think saddam is bad before anyone tells me how much i love him.

[XTC]

I always would of thought Saddam to be a Commando kind of person and not Tighty Whiteys. Oh Well....

[Button Basher]

i always look at the other hand when they flash crap like this in front of us. if the mainstream is focusing on something as stupid as saddam wearing underwear...you can be sure something else 1000 times more important is happening.

If it's not saddam, it's Abi Titmuss. Welcome to the world of British tabloids.

[pisshead]

same crap over here.

i can think of 100 things of more importance to be talking about. it's always nice to look at the front page of the paper and sports is the top story.

bread and circus. that's all it is, bread and circus.

[pisshead]

according to lord bush, this is a very serious matter that needs to be investigated.

is he a liberal for caring about the feelings of terrorists?
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0%2C2933%2C157122%2C00.html (http://www.foxnews.com/story/0%2C2933%2C157122%2C00.html)
Papers Publish Photos of Imprisoned Saddam
Friday, May 20, 2005

PHOTOS

Click image to enlarge
STORIES BACKGROUND LINKS
â?¢U.S. Investigates Source of Saddam Photosâ?¢Shiites Protest U.S.; Iraqi PM Heads to Syriaâ?¢Iraq, Iran Blame Saddam for Warsâ?¢England Abuse Hearing to Be Held Next Weekâ?¢Iraqi PM Wants Syria to Help Stop Insurgentsâ?¢Zarqawi Tape Justifies Killing of Muslimsâ?¢Apologetic GI Gets 6 Months for Iraq Abuseâ?¢U.S. Official Blames Zarqawi for Iraq Violence
BAGHDAD, Iraq â?? British and American newspapers published photos Friday showing an imprisoned Saddam Hussein clad only in his underwear and washing his laundry, prompting an angry U.S. military to launch an investigation and the Red Cross to say the pictures may violate the Geneva Conventions (search).

Britain's The Sun and the New York Post said the photos were provided by a U.S. military official they did not identify. The photos not only angered the U.S. military, which issued a condemnation rare for its immediacy, but also were expected to further fuel anti-American sentiment in a country edging toward open sectarian conflict.

Click here to read the story (registration required).

[The Sun, the New York Post and FOX News Channel are all owned by News Corporation.]

"This is an insult to show the former president in such a condition. Saddam is from the past now, so what is the reason for this? It is bad work from the media. Do they want to degrade the Iraqi people? Or they want to provoke their feelings," said Abu Barick, a 45-year-old Baghdad businessman.

President Bush was briefed by senior aides Friday morning about the photos and "strongly supports the aggressive and thorough investigation that is already under way" that seeks to find who took them, White House spokesman Trent Duffy said.


With that inquiry ongoing, he would not comment on how the pictures may affect the U.S. image abroad.

"The investigation needs to take place and the president supports that," Duffy said.

Iraqis gathered in coffee shops in Baghdad and elsewhere watched as some Arab satellite networks showed the front page of The Sun, with its picture of Saddam standing in his underwear. Other photos show him clothed and seated on a chair doing some washing, sleeping and walking in what is described as his prison yard.

In northern Kirkuk (search), Marwan Ibrahim, a 31-year-old civil servant, said the pictures were a "humiliation for a man who in the near past was the leader of Iraq and a top Arab leader in the region."

Others, however, were not so kind.

"Saddam Hussein and his regime were bloody and practiced mass killing against the people, therefore, whatever happens to Saddam, whether he is photographed naked or washing his clothes, it means nothing to me. That's the least he deserves," said Hawre Saliee, a 38-year-old Kurd.

The U.S. military in Baghdad said the photos violated military guidelines "and possibly Geneva Convention guidelines for the humane treatment of detained individuals."

"The specific issue here is that these images are against [Department of Defense] policy. It's not the content of the photo that is the issue at hand, but it is the existence or release of the photos," U.S. military spokesman Staff Sgt. Don Dees said.

He added that the military would question the troops holding Saddam as part of its investigation.

"We take seriously our responsibility to ensure the safety and security of all detainees," a military statement said.

The military said the source of the photos was not immediately known, but they were believed to have been taken more than a year ago.

The International Committee for the Red Cross (search), which is responsible for monitoring prisoners of war and detainees, said the photographs violated Saddam's right to privacy.

"Taking and using photographs of him is clearly forbidden," ICRC Middle East spokeswoman Dorothea Krimitsas said. U.S. forces are obliged to "preserve the privacy of the detainee."

Aside from U.S. soldiers, the only others with access to Saddam are his legal team, prosecuting judge Raed Johyee and the ICRC.

Khalil al-Duleimi, Saddam's defense lawyer in Iraq, criticized the American handling of Saddam but said he would not comment on the photographs until he learned whether they were genuine.

"I don't doubt such behavior from the American forces because they don't respect the law. They impose the law of force and the law of the jungle," al-Duleimi said about the pictures being taken. "They don't respect human rights and I expect them to do anything."

Saddam was captured in December 2003 while hiding in a concealed hole in the ground near his hometown of Tikrit, 80 miles north of Baghdad. He is charged with war crimes, but no date has been set for his trial.

It is not the first time there has been an outcry over images of Saddam.

Pictures and video images of Saddam being examined by a medic after his arrest were widely criticized â?? even by the Vatican. A top Vatican cardinal said at the time that American forces treated the captured Iraqi leader "like a cow."

[Button Basher]

When Saddam's sons were killed by marines, The Sun had high-detail photos of their corpses on the front page. Closeups on their lifeless, dead expressions.

Surely if anything violates the Geneva convention, that does :confused: .

[amsterdam]

When Saddam's sons were killed by marines, The Sun had high-detail photos of their corpses on the front page. Closeups on their lifeless, dead expressions.

Surely if anything violates the Geneva convention, that does :confused: .


why would that violate the convention??because it didnt.