Haven't smoked in 45 days, will I pass?

[Paranoid1225]

I had to take a urine test today that was sent to a lab. I'm 6 ft, 133 pounds, and I take a 7 mile bike ride twice a week and also jog 2 miles twice a week. Before i stopped, i would go through a halfe in 1-2 weeks and I have been doing that for about a year. I know there's a lot of variables that play into this, but what do you think?

[Burnt Toast]

Exactly what you said: there are too many variables that come into play. A THC test kit wouldve given you the answer, but youve already taken the actual U/A which is now out of your hands as well as everyone elses. Theres nothing in others responses that will change the outcome of the U/A.

[Paranoid1225]

I did two of those from walgreens, they both came out as negative. I've read that the Lab tests are different from take home kits though and you can't always rely on those. Hoping for the best.

[Burnt Toast]

I did two of those from walgreens, they both came out as negative. I've read that the Lab tests are different from take home kits though and you can't always rely on those. Hoping for the best. Even though its sent to a lab, an assay is still used for the initial screening. The assays used by the lab function on the same principle as the home test (being an assay itself). Therefore, neither are more reliable than the other.

[tlranger]

Urine test, time factor, and tests. Good place for my question.

Three very close people trying to clean up, two nursing students still dirty after 60 days, one probation tested still dirty after 120 days, is it better testing(detecting smaller amounts), or better pot and concentrates(good hash and tears)?

[Burnt Toast]

Urine test, time factor, and tests. Good place for my question.

Three very close people trying to clean up, two nursing students still dirty after 60 days, one probation tested still dirty after 120 days, is it better testing(detecting smaller amounts), or better pot and concentrates(good hash and tears)? More than likely neither. More than likely the pattern of use and metabolic rates. Before your post, we've had a few posters that still tested dirty after more than 100 days mainly because they were longtime heavy users who were obese and/or lived completely sedentary lifestyles (read ZERO physical activity).

[tlranger]

The nursing students, were using very good stuff, in extract, in concentrate, very good kief hash+ oil, + smoke. Very heavy users but quit to pass test that has not occurred. The dirty results have come with home kits(their wanting to pass) both very active 20 something girls, neither would go +120#.

The third has been being moved by feds across county for last three months, so I'm sure sedimentary is correct.

But things now looking up now, thanks for your input!!;)

[tlranger]

Can second hand smoke residue affect an at home sample test? Cause neither significant other quit.

[Burnt Toast]

Can second hand smoke residue affect an at home sample test? Cause neither significant other quit. No. ALL urine drug tests recognize drug metabolites, not residues. THC has to be ingested and metabolized in order to be detectable on a urine drug test.
And you cannot test positive on the basis of secondhand smoke.

[tlranger]

Got word today, both gals are moving forward on nursing path. Both care enough to be really good at it, if allowed.