Quick Fix 5.7 Plus Questions!

[daherbalz]

Hello All, I just joined today because I wanted to post a question about Quick Fix 5.7 Plus.

I recently just accepted a job offer from a bank in the DC/Maryland/Virginia area. I don't know where they will send me but i'm guessing it will be LabCorp, considering there are hundreds in the surrounding area. After tons of research I've decided on going with Quick Fix to save me from having a heartattack by trying to dilute or use a flush shake. I'm cool under pressure so subbing seems like the best option for me.

Questions:

1) quickfixsynthetic.com is where I just ordered my quickfix from. The transaction was made with CCNOW. Has anyone used this site before to buy? If so, how were the results? I'm scared of the "counterfeit" rumor that's going around.

2) I ordered the QF Plus because I heard of someone on this forum saying they didn't have enough synthetic so had to add some of their own urine. Not willing to take that chance; However, because I'm using the 3fl oz bottle i'm guessing it will be harder to maintain at target range temperature. Anyone with experience using plus can add some input?

3) Any ideas on how to practice without ordering 2 Quick Fixes :( ?

4) Input on subbing quickfix synthetic urine with friend's urine? Same microwave time, heat warmer still keeps it warm? Lol, probably stupid question but just want this to be full proof.

5) *** I have been exploring different forums as well. I've seen some disturbing posts from users claiming they've been noticing an increased amount of people failing their tests due to: No Uric Acid, **No Urine Odor**, no foaming. This has been freaking me out, and clearly is my biggest concern. It seems almost retarded that a doctor (or whoever does these tests) performing a urinalysis would NOT notice that this urine has NO ODOR! This is scaring the living shit out of me. Once again, I believe I will be taking the test at LabCorp.

6) I'm not really trying to practice. I don't want this shit consuming my thoughts any longer. I smoke weed, it doesn't harm anyone or my productivity so fuck the man for caring what I do on my free time. Anyways with that being said, is it pretty easy and straight forward to get the synthetic urine out of the QF bottle and into the test container?

Thanks in advanced for everyone's time and effort. God speed to all who have to deal with this bullshit.

Have a good night.

-Pissed off banker.

[webdox]

Questions:

1) commercial link removed <--- is where I just ordered my quickfix from. The transaction was made with CCNOW. Has anyone used this site before to buy? If so, how were the results? I'm scared of the "counterfeit" rumor that's going around.

Link removed... Even if someone has ordered from there before, it is always suggested that no matter where you bought it to run the same integrity tests the lab will run on your sample. They can be purchased online.


2) I ordered the QF Plus because I heard of someone on this forum saying they didn't have enough synthetic so had to add some of their own urine. Not willing to take that chance; However, because I'm using the 3fl oz bottle i'm guessing it will be harder to maintain at target range temperature. Anyone with experience using plus can add some input?

3 oz is no harder to maintain than 2 oz.

All the other questions have been addressed many times here and in similar forums that have substitution stickies. As for your concerns of lab detection, until I see a scanned report showing a failure I remain very reluctant to believe the few stories going around. There are people who frequent this and similar forums who only sell detox products, hell they are even let them be mods at another popular pot website's Drug Testing forums and they have been known to create ALT accounts trying to spread unfounded FUD regarding the use of synthetics going so far as to claim that people have served jail time for using them. They have agendas and pocketbooks that conflict and suffer when someone uses and passes with synthetic. Good luck.

[daherbalz]

thank you!

So you would recommend testing the integrity of the product myself rather than calling spectrum labs to verify the validity of the product via batch number?

[webdox]

100% yes. I never leave it up to chance. Good batches can go bad, that's why it's best to check yourself...

[daherbalz]

I previously bought drug test kit from CVS, is that what you are talking about. Or are you talking about individually testing the QF sample for uric acid levels, ph levels, creatine levels, etc. If so, how the fuck would I go about doing this lol. I'm not trying to set up a lab in my apt.

Thanks.

[Burnt Toast]

For testing synthetic urine batches, you use a drug adulteration test kit. And you dont have to "set up a lab" at your living quarters in order to run these test kits.

The test kits are found dirt cheap by doing a Google search.


To administer the test kit, read post #13 in this thread: http://boards.cannabis.com/drug-testing/143928-sample-validity-even-pre-employment-test.html#post1756820

[cofergus]

I asked these same questions about a year ago about SMELL and FOAMING. All I got for an answer was replies such as, "not all urine bubbles" or "the techs arent paid enough to sniff everyones urine". I have successfully subbed with quickfix at a temp agency where they used a 5 panel dip stick test similiar to the ones that you can buy at any drug store. They did not smell or look at anything except my temp and my negative result, but I have always been paranoid about those same questions if I had to take it at a doctor's office or Labcorp, etc. Anyway, if anyone has answers to the SMELL and FOAMING issues, I would like to know as well. You're already nervous enough when subbing, the last thing you want to worry about is a pissed off/by the book tech who is just looking to catch someone subbing. I understand the cat and mouse game, but the slightest thing can send off a red flag to the tech, who would then make you take another test (either supervised or unsupervised. Regardless, at that point, your dead in the water because you have already used your quickfix and if you could pass with your own urine then you wouldnt have subbed in the first place. Please help me and the OP.

[Burnt Toast]

I asked these same questions about a year ago about SMELL and FOAMING. All I got for an answer was replies such as, "not all urine bubbles" or "the techs arent paid enough to sniff everyones urine". I have successfully subbed with quickfix at a temp agency where they used a 5 panel dip stick test similiar to the ones that you can buy at any drug store. They did not smell or look at anything except my temp and my negative result, but I have always been paranoid about those same questions if I had to take it at a doctor's office or Labcorp, etc. Anyway, if anyone has answers to the SMELL and FOAMING issues, I would like to know as well. You're already nervous enough when subbing, the last thing you want to worry about is a pissed off/by the book tech who is just looking to catch someone subbing. I understand the cat and mouse game, but the slightest thing can send off a red flag to the tech, who would then make you take another test (either supervised or unsupervised. Regardless, at that point, your dead in the water because you have already used your quickfix and if you could pass with your own urine then you wouldnt have subbed in the first place. Please help me and the OP.





The Search button is your friend.:thumbsup:


Questions about urine odor/foaming have been answered numerous times throughout the DT forum. The answers can be found by doing an Advanced Search, using the terms "lack odor foaming human sample"

Read and learn.

[webdox]

I can confirm this has been addressed many, many, many times. The FUD spreaders will always find people to fall for their unconfirmed, unsubstantiated synthetic "failures". A million success stories will always be trumped by 1 or 2 "fails".

[webdox]

Too late to edit so more...

If certain labs are deviating and in fact failing people for something that is up to the senses of the collector and not something that can be quantified we would love to see that in writing. That said, we are still waiting for someone to post a scanned report stating they were failed for lack of foam or smell. As of yet, no one has ever followed up. Still waiting...