View Full Version : Anyone pass adding clean urine to qf ?
kickboater
03-15-2010, 10:33 PM
This sounds lame but I have qf 5.7 2oz version and cant afford another bottle.I am aware of the new 3oz version and after reading about the big bowl like specimen collection deal in another post , I just want to have it all covered.
My GF can provide me a clean sample , and I have extra empty qf bottle so I wonder if you can top off the actual qf w/the real thing (clean urine) to get to the 3oz level line if necessary.
Spectrum says not to add anything but ,I`m still wondering.
Also I have never been asked for more than 2oz and i have tested several times in my past......you never know though.
Thanks in advance ,
a little paranoid here.
Deige
03-15-2010, 10:52 PM
This sounds lame but I have qf 5.7 2oz version and cant afford another bottle.I am aware of the new 3oz version and after reading about the big bowl like specimen collection deal in another post , I just want to have it all covered.
My GF can provide me a clean sample , and I have extra empty qf bottle so I wonder if you can top off the actual qf w/the real thing (clean urine) to get to the 3oz level line if necessary.
Spectrum says not to add anything but ,I`m still wondering.
Also I have never been asked for more than 2oz and i have tested several times in my past......you never know though.
Thanks in advance ,
a little paranoid here.
Adding clean urine won't make a difference in the sample. You did say that you have never been asked for more than two ounces... Why is this time any different?
kickboater
03-15-2010, 10:58 PM
same reason they make a 3oz version AND I read somewhere on here that there is a bowl like collection cup that has the line above the 2oz mark.
I was just wanting to have it all covered as there are some conflicting claims on this issue.Again I am just a little worried, been outa work too long and its very important I am prepared for whatever I can think of.
Thanks for the info.
Deige
03-15-2010, 11:08 PM
same reason they make a 3oz version AND I read somewhere on here that there is a bowl like collection cup that has the line above the 2oz mark.
I was just wanting to have it all covered as there are some conflicting claims on this issue.Again I am just a little worried, been outa work too long and its very important I am prepared for whatever I can think of.
Thanks for the info.
Like I said above, the clean urine added to the sample will not make any difference. Some testers take a split sample and this can require more than 2oz. It's nothing to be worried about, if you can't give more than 2oz then you can't. A tester won't fail you for not being able to piss on command.
kickboater
03-15-2010, 11:15 PM
Right on thanks again , this helps ease my mind .:thumbsup:
Cant wait to medicate :jointsmile:
FakeBoobsRule
03-16-2010, 01:25 PM
Some testers take a split sample and this can require more than 2oz.
Deige you've done such a good job helping people pass their tests lately but this time you're a little off. The split sample requires 30 mls for the A sample, 15 for the B sample.
2 ounces or 60 mls is more than enough. I think the 3 ounce version is just a way to separate people from their money.
Basically if you give a collector 2 ounces after they have asked for more, they will have to write on the collection form that they failed you for only giving 2 ounces which isn't a reason to fail someone and in theory the MRO should catch this and the collector would be the one in trouble.
Deige
03-16-2010, 03:34 PM
Deige you've done such a good job helping people pass their tests lately but this time you're a little off. The split sample requires 30 mls for the A sample, 15 for the B sample.
2 ounces or 60 mls is more than enough. I think the 3 ounce version is just a way to separate people from their money.
Basically if you give a collector 2 ounces after they have asked for more, they will have to write on the collection form that they failed you for only giving 2 ounces which isn't a reason to fail someone and in theory the MRO should catch this and the collector would be the one in trouble.
Sorry for the misinformation FBR. I'll make sure my facts are straight next time before I post.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5 Copyright © 2025 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.