you didn't get it off me, alright?

[anaacid]

Drug law, that we are incapable of controlling our behaviour, despite the nicities of molecular metaphor; what is prohibition, the obstructive control of material? Why is this substance exclusive, who is curtailed by this exclusion, who benefits from this exclusion and what right is there of authority defined by this probable infraction of the human rights to infringe :smokin:freedom of understanding all elements of the universe. Prohibition is of course for the mutual benefit of specific groups defined by a common interestâ?¦ prohibition is therefore not a law, or a right but rather a challenge and recommendation of those employing their rights and to see that human behaviour is specifically sensible to employ this 'right' in these contextsâ?¦ drugs are not dangerous to wise persons!? I have written some ideas about licence proposition for those without similar mindâ?¦

Inequality - â??you should not feel like you have performed an arrestâ?¦ look up man you are a policeman, you should not have let this blighter away with us in the first place!â?� - we all know that the military use drugs to aid protection, so there is nothing wrong with the simple propagation of a herb, we know how she does it, conspires complicit identification and then retracts group identity leaving the grower wallowing in guilt! prepare a sentence to provide should she wish to see if you are okayâ?¦ but do not tell anybody what that sentence is until you feel the time is right, that is martial art. Do not be arrestedâ?¦ you need to be sure that you have done no wrong, the best way to do this is to be honest, either then you are just as good as the roscoe at martial arts (do not tell lies) or a psycho that no-one likes anyway - do not be afraid of the law, they have as much fear of violence as anybody else, if she takes you to the prison and you are allowed to live, there will be an opportunity to grow again, indeed as a smoker it is a unwanted bonus to be placed under arrest, she is granting you the licence you crave. Such extremes are of course not necessary, as long as you keep quiet about the grow and remain ordinary, intact! You will of course be superior to the coppers in many respects ; you have no weapons, you have no need of aggression or intrusion or a vast contingental resource frightening the whole community, you are more productive more ecomonical and more peaceful

[killerweed420]

Clearly prohibition of any substance by the federal government is unconstitutional. But how do you enforce the law? Are we going to make a citizens arrest of all out legislatures and executive branch of the government?
This is the problem. These assholes know they are violating the constitution and they also know there is absolutely nothing we can do about it.

[luciddreamer]

Hm, good post anaacid, not as incomprehensible as your last one.
Seriously, pretty good!

[anaacid]

CLEARLY as a political bias we are faced by a problem which the government seems to be slowly... placing in the hands of the common peoples. I think that nationalism has been pushed too hard by police and nowadays with readily available access to communications for most ... and marijuana is seen as a tomtemised object of status rather than the quite dangerous but rather lowly and dirty plant that she is... thank-you for the encouragement IT looks as though my original post has been edited? pitfalls of the stateside !

[Rusty Trichome]

IT looks as though my original post has been edited? pitfalls of the stateside !
Not necessarily. More likely the pitfalls of posting garbage the mods deem inappropriate. Not everyone that grows their own meds has the same attitudes as you, and some of the postings can be tedious and insulting.

Very ethereal...now if you would only make your point instead of running sentences and thoughts together like an auctioneer on Red Bull, searching the dictionary for pithy superlatives.

Seems to me...those with their cannabis card could care less about ranting and raving of the social injustices of governmental repression of the freedom to bonghit whatever and wherever we please. Likely because the state government has already given those of us with the true medical need, the possibility of relief.

[anaacid]

what was really interested in was provoking solid obversations about the inequality and social disruption caused quite directly by marijuana prohibition. Things like economy why is that day after day the gov are willing to justify prohibition against those most easily disrupted, it might cost $20,000 dollars or more (based on theory) to process a domestic grower nevermind man hours, despite actually engaging in war which it is my belief is a protectionist stance defending trade routes? Am I wrong? and what of positive opinions for the use of drugs socially - they keep you warm outside, all that... and especially inequality in terms of financial resource, the rich grow dope, that is for sure but tower block new york can she keep her nose clean for long enough to bun a herb? not easily with ganja by weight on the street and some sort of luminary proposition of stratification in terms of wealth, the rich get more numb? and the poor get thinner at a positive level of composure is it a conspiricy?:thumbsup: