Question about the rules

[Coelho]

Well... is the mere act of posting in a thread with "other drug talk" against the rules? Even if the only mention of this "other drugs" done was a warning against its use?

[LolaGal]

Crack KILLS!

[DTRave420]

Crack KILLS!

Yep...

[Its a Plant]

Well... is the mere act of posting in a thread with "other drug talk" against the rules? Even if the only mention of this "other drugs" done was a warning against its use?

Technically it is against the rules to respond to a post that violates the forum guidelines, so the best thing you can do is instead of responding to it, simply report that post and a moderator will be along shortly to take the proper actions.

Have a good one. :jointsmile:

[DTRave420]

Technically it is against the rules to respond to a post that violates the forum guidelines

I've done a couple a crappy things in my lifetime but I cannot bear the thought of being labeled a "literary accessory after the fact"...:D

[SouthernGuerilla]

I've done a couple a crappy things in my lifetime but I cannot bear the thought of being labeled a "literary accessory after the fact"...:D

LOL!

Don't get caught!

[FakeBoobsRule]

Coelho, several people responded in that thread. When I was handing out infractions to those who thought it was ok to break the rules since they didn't start the thread or something, I picked your post and was trying to pick another. No you didn't break the rules by telling them what you said. You should see that it was reversed. If you didn't see that, look closely again.

While I don't see anything wrong with responding to a post that is breaking the rules by telling the poster that they are indeed breaking the rules, sometimes it is easy just to report. If you respond to a post that is breaking the rules with anything other than telling the OP they are breaking the rules or that they need to read the forum rules, etc, then you are also breaking the rules.