September 11th for the blind

[Smudgeyboy]

WTC 7 fell identically to the way it would have had it been for that structure to be properly demolished, with the centre collapsed first so it could fold in on itself....isnt that odd? That way gravity, jet fuel and 'millionaire terrorists who hate your money loving ways' did that? What a coincidence.

But here's the thing...nothing hit WTC7. No planes, no fake planes, no UFOs, nothing! Planes hit the towers alright, nothing hit WTC7, NOTHING.

But hey, they all fell the same way, in on themselves...maybe the terrorists had nothing to do with it! Maybe they fell that day anyway!?

I mean, if the planes didnt cause it on WTC7 and it fell the same as the towers, maybe it was natural?!

I wonder why you always hear about the 'Twin Towers' on the media? I dont think ive seen anything about WTC7 in the media since the day it happened.

Suppose it's just a coincidence!

And Barack wants change, change from Afghanistan to Pakistan, cos that's where Osama is now apparently. And Iran and Iraq are all harbouring him too.


Nothing to do with empire or natural resources, since when did governments care about them?

As for killing 3000 of their own people, the elite see ordinary citizens as a sub-branch of humans, the kind of beings stupid enough to fall for this shit for so long.

And then there's the obvious melted steel, collapsed structure, explosions in the basement, news reporting it before it happened, huge insurance policys, OSAMA BIN LADEN WORKED FOR THE CIA IN THE 80's TRAINING THE AL QUEDA TO TAKE OUT SADAM, THIS IS A FACT AND WAS PUBLICISED AT THE TIME

By now kids, if you dont know about September 11th, slap yourself cos even if you do know about september 11th it's absolutley nothing. Your food, water and atmosphere is poisened daily.

[killerweed420]

I've got to say I don't much believe in the conspiracy of 9/11. Except for building 7.
WTC7.net the hidden story of Building 7: Videos Show Building 7's Vertical Collapse (http://www.wtc7.net/videos.html)
The video's are pretty good evidence that something odd happened in #7. The twin towers went down because of the planes jet fuel. The pentagon hit was obviously a plane. One of the engines and landing gear are plainly visible in lots of pics. But I have never heard of an acceptable explanation for WTC7.

[Smudgeyboy]

So they collapsed WTC7 but not the twin towers beside them that also look exactly like a controlled demolition?

Why collapse WTC7 on the same day as September 11th?

'They didnt know september 11th was going to happen'. I

t's a pure coincidence that out of 365 days of the year, they happened to plan a secret (why?) controlled demolition right beside a 'terrorist' attack that, just how it turned out, both buildings also LOOKED like controlled demolition?

So we have a secret demolition of a government building working independently to a secret terrorist attack on the same day on the same set of buildings...


Come on

Who told Norad to stand down? That plane should have been shot down 2 minutes after going off course.

[BlazedinBA]

the part on WTC7 on zeitgeist DEFINITLY makes u think wat really did happen??:wtf: and if a plane did infact hit the pentagon how come there is no video evidence of it? the media was allowed to show video of the towers gettin hit by planes but all the cameras around the pentagon were confiscated immediatly after the attack.

hmmm

[flyingimam]

wow r u guys actually surpirsed even if there is indeed a conspiracy regarding this issue???

get a life, consipracies are for the governments, 'covert ops' yall surely heard about, and sometimes the governments are not as lovely and sacred and citizen-loving as they are portrayed to be

there is one very well said phrase for it "Freedom is not free" they say this when u talk about iraqi civilians killed in this war, what makes u think they wouldn't go by the same analogy about American citizens in a limited number?!?!

come on, the stoners they are arresting every 40 seconds are mostly american citizens getting their lives totally ruined, what makes u think this govt cares about American lives if it serves the greatest purposes of all in their eyes???

want other examples? FDA approved drugs that killed Americans
want more? look at rallies back in 1960s and 1970s, all of a sudden masses of Americans were called terrorists and anarchists
want even more? Dallas county @ heart of Texas, is the record holding county in the country to have convicted complete innocent people that were recently exonerated by hard evidence of DNA, only god knows how many of these people were convicted and even put on death row across the country

get it: Government consists of people, MANY times these people turn out to be corrupt mofos putting their personal/agenda interest first before the nations or for that matter individuals interest

I cant understand how a lot of US citizens still view the oval office as a 'sacred' place or the government as a totally incapable entity of doing such things

Vietnam war served no purpose for the country, it failed at the end, got many citizens killed n injured, served no purpose in containing communism, Vietnam technically remains a communist state to date, but i tell ya what it did serve: ARMS INDUSTRY's interests and military's interests, at different levels many many many individuals got their bread n butter for this war during a very long time

similar to war on drugs and how its performed, its only us the informed who know wtf is up and that is because they cant censor all the overwhelming info about marijuana thats floating around on the internet these days

and we all know about Iraq, contractors, private armies (mercenaries), oil, WMD lies and all that crap involved in it... yet people still trust the politicians and governments on their word when it comes to such topics as security, terrorism n wars

I wouldnt buy their word for that crap anymore than I do for what they say about weed

[OldBastard]

!. When the first building fell, the top was leaning out at about a 15 degree
angle, which would redistribute the weight to that corner, negating a
symmetrical global failure (which is impossible anyway), and it would have followed the law of conservation of energy, momentum, and inertia, by toppling over, if not acted upon by another force. This is not my opinion.
2. The fact that burning hydrocarbons cannot get hot enough to weaken
structural steel to the point of failure of integrity.
3. the lack of meaningful resistance when this improbable "symmetrical"
collapse occurs, especially given the fact that the lower 2/3 of the buildings
were constructed out of thicker stronger girders. Even if .375 of one second
of resistance were to occur at each floor (south tower) the top would have taken 33.75 seconds to reach the ground, which was not the case.
4. Steel girders were blown out and up. A feat that cannot happen with a gravitational collapse.
5.For six weeks afterwards, pools of molten steel were observed by those cleaning up, and by infrared satellite by NASA. There is no "official" source of
energy that would cause this.
6. The many, many witnesses to explosions in the buildings, including one
that occurred before the first plane hit, in which a 10 ton hydrolic press
was destroyed, along with a mans skin.
7. Edna Cintron waving out of the crash hole where if the heat was as high
so as to weaken buttresses at the same time all around her, couldn't have taken it.
8. Steel is a good conductor of heat, and hydrocarbon fires not hot enough.
9. Cars were incinerated all around the area.
10. There is video evidence of an anomalous burst of an incendiary device
coming from near the nose of the second plane which has no valid explanation.
11. Norman Mineta's testimony concerning a young officer informing Dick Cheney about incoming jet at 10 miles intervals, and the officer asking
Cheney "Sir,does the Order still stand?" Cheney "whipped" his head around and snarled " have you heard anything to the contrary?"
12. The lack of tumbling, and asymmetry, and the turning to dust of concrete.
13. There is testimony by a famous artist who was employed by the WTC engineering firm that the towers had explosives built into the design for insurance purpose, but he seems like kind of a nut. (Paul Lafolley"
14. The jets should have all been shot down, not just #93.
15. The Odigo employees who got text messages not to go to work that day.
16. 5 Dancing Israelis
17. Lap dancing, drinking, swearing abusive Devout Muslims.
18. Guilty actions by guilty parties after. Destroyed evidence, lying, stalling investigation, draconian legislation, more lying.
19. Promotions for those who "failed admirably" at their jobs on 911.
20. Put options on Airline stock which were not talked about again, when the trail led to a CIA asset Buzzy Krongard.
21 The incredibly inept smear job "debunking" by Micheal Chertoff's cousin
at PM, and others, that give validity to the question of 911, by deeming the question important enough not to just ignore, like I did for 2 years.
22. Alex Jones (who is controlled opposition) predicted it from current events as False flag before it happened.
23. The destruction of the lobbys and the absurd theory that jet fuel
traveled all that way, and changed elevators two times at the exchanges, and busting the place up. With no soot on top of it.
24. Bone fragments found on tops of building 100's of feet away, which ranged in size from microns to .0625 of an inch, which indicate velocities
far above jet airplanes and falling buildings
25. Later peace

[linearvermin]

I've got to say I don't much believe in the conspiracy of 9/11. Except for building 7.
WTC7.net the hidden story of Building 7: Videos Show Building 7's Vertical Collapse (http://www.wtc7.net/videos.html)
The video's are pretty good evidence that something odd happened in #7. The twin towers went down because of the planes jet fuel. The pentagon hit was obviously a plane. One of the engines and landing gear are plainly visible in lots of pics. But I have never heard of an acceptable explanation for WTC7.

The pentagon was so not obviously hit by a plane. Yes there was an engine and landing gear next to it, but what about the rest of the plane? The hole made by the plane didn't even look like a airplane hit it...it was round like a missile. Where was the wing damage? Theres so much bs to 911, and honestly I'm not one for conspiracy theories but there is a lot of sketchy stuff with 911 that doesn't add up. The U.S. Gov. story doesn't even add up...read it. Were so obsessed with convincing ourselves that our gov. is righteous and honorable when history clearly shows our gov. is full of crooks, liars, and killers.

[killerweed420]

Its still possible that WTC7 was brought down by fire just like the other towers were. The had built the building over an existing power station and anybody who knows anything about transformers knows they are very explosive and full of hot burning oil plus the 4th and 5 th floor had huge backyp deisel generators. So its still possible that it burned from the inside out. And I bet anything with cheap chinese steel, which is really of poor quality.
But the building was primarily rented to Salomon Brothers so it certainly could have a been a target too.

[OldBastard]

Killer weed you're grasping. Refute all those points I made in my post, please,
you're kind of just ignoring what I wrote.
"like the other towers were" Where did you get that nonsense from?

I've got 4 years into this, and I can answer definitively on ANY point I've made.