Why is this section seperate from the Politics section?

[IrieMass]

Is the implication is that everything in here is fictional opposed to the political section which is the 'serious' section?

[bhouncy]

Read the sticky at the top or here (http://boards.cannabis.com/conspiracy/96642-conspiracy-forum-here.html).

[stinkyattic]

The implication was not intended to be that it is FICTIONAL, but rather that the ideas expressed in here need to be fleshed out better by documented and accepted facts- stories in politics, there's less argument about what actually HAPPENED; it's more about future policy.

[rebgirl420]

I think possibly it's the fact that many of the postings that fall into the "conspiracy" section cannot be proved as true.

And many times the posts are ludacris and/or ridiculous.

[IrieMass]

I think possibly it's the fact that many of the postings that fall into the "conspiracy" section cannot be proved as true.

And many times the posts are ludacris and/or ridiculous.

That's what I thought. And by comparison everything in the political section is true right? I guess McCain is a good conservative hoping to help us fight 'the war on terror' & Barack Obama is a beacon of hope that's gonna bring us prosperity and 'change'. All totally credible ideas compared to the far out, paranoid suggestion that perhaps these guys & their backers are actually out for their own profit & advancement in worldly power rather than the well being of the people.

[IrieMass]

Read the sticky at the top or here (http://boards.cannabis.com/conspiracy/96642-conspiracy-forum-here.html).

I like how there's a rolled eyes face right in the sticky for what the section's about. As if the silly 'official story' of 9/11 is at all credible & has not been ripped to shreads by independent investigations.

[stinkyattic]

Okey dokey, this thread has gone from a simple question on site arrangement, which is now answered, to a political discussion on whether opinions on candidates are valid vs. invalid.

CLOSED.