texas grass
05-27-2008, 09:50 PM
The Hidden and Dangerous Side Effects of Fluoride
Controversial fluoride is one of the basic ingredients in both PROZAC (FLUoxetene Hydrochloride) and Sarin nerve gas (Isopropyl-Methyl-Phosphoryl FLUoride).
Sodium fluoride, a hazardous-waste by-product from the manufacture of Aluminum, is a common ingredient in rat and cockroach poisons, anesthetics, hypnotics, psychiatric drugs, and military nerve gas. It??s historically been quite expensive to properly dispose of, until some aluminum industries with an overabundance of the stuff sold the public on the terrifically insane but highly profitable idea of buying it at a 20,000% markup, injecting it into our water supplies, and then DRINKING it. Yes, a 20,000% markup: Fluoride ?? intended only for human consumption by people under 14 years of age ?? is injected into our drinking water supply at approximately 1 part-per-million (PPM), but since we only drink ½ of one percent of the total water supply, the rest literally goes down the drain as a free hazardous-waste disposal for the chemical industry, where we PAY them so that we can flush their expensive hazardous waste down our toilets. How many salesmen dream of such a deal? (Follow the money.)
Independent scientific evidence repeatedly showing up over the past 50 years reveals that fluoride allegedly shortens our life span, promotes cancer and various mental disturbances, accelerates osteoporosis and broken hips in old folks, and makes us stupid, docile, and subservient, all in one package. There are reports of aluminum in the brain possibly being a causative factor in Alzheimer??s disease, and evidence points towards fluoride??s strong affinity for aluminum and also its ability to ??trick? the blood-brain barrier by looking like the hydrogen ion, and thus allowing chemical access to brain tissue.
Scientists who have attempted to blow the whistle on this mega-bucks PR ploy have consistently been given a very unscientific Black-PR treatment, and thus their valid points disputing the current vested interests never arrive in the press. Follow the money to find the control. In 1952 the slick PR campaign which ramrodded the concept of fluoridation through via our Public Health departments and various dental organizations was likened to a highly-emotional ??beer-salesman??s convention? instead of the objective scientific experiment it should properly have been. It??s continued in that vein right up to present time. To illustrate the emotional vs. the scientific nature of this issue, just look at the response given by people (perhaps yourself included?) when the subject of fluoridation comes up. Ask yourself ??Is this response EMOTIONAL BLUSTER, or is it UNBIASED AND OPENLY-INTERESTED OBJECTIVITY?? There is a tremendous amount of emotional, highly unscientific know-it-all attached to fluoridation. Many truly independent (unattached to any vested-interest) scientists who??ve spent a large portion of their lives studying and working with this subject have been subjected to a surprising amount of uncalled-for and unfair character assassination from strong vested-interest groups who profit from the public??s ignorance as well as from their illnesses. (Follow the money).
Do you have diabetes or kidney disease? There are reportedly more than 11 million Americans with diabetes. Since many diabetics drink more liquids than other people, then according to the Physicians Desk reference these 11 million Americans probably shouldn??t drink fluoridated water, because in doing so, they??ll receive an excessive dose of fluoride.
Kidney disease, by definition, lowers the efficiency of the kidneys, which is your main route of fluoride elimination. ??So those people with kidney disease also shouldn??t drink fluoridated water. Cases are on record (Annapolis, Maryland, 1979) where kidney patients on dialysis machines died, due to a fluoride overdose in the city water supply. Let??s begin at the beginning:
The first occurrence of fluoridated drinking water on earth was found in Germany??s Nazi prison camps. The Gestapo had little concern about fluoride??s supposed effect on children??s teeth; their alleged reason for mass-medicating water with sodium fluoride was to sterilize humans and force the people in their concentration camps into calm submission. (Ref. Book: ??The Crime and Punishment of I.G. Farben? by Joseph Borkin.)
The following letter was received by the Lee Foundation for Nutritional Research, Milwaukee Wisconsin, on October 2nd 1954, from Mr. Charles Perkins, a chemist: ??I have your letter of September 29 asking for further documentation regarding a statement made in my book, The Truth about Water Fluoridation, to the effect that the idea of water fluoridation was brought to England from Russia by the Russian Communist Kreminoff.? In the 1930s, Hitler and the German Nazi??s envisioned a world to be dominated and controlled by a Nazi philosophy of Pan-Germanism. The German chemists worked out a very ingenious and far-reaching plan of mass-control which was submitted to and adopted by the German General Staff. This plan was to control the population in any given area through mass medication of drinking water supplies. By this method they could control the population in whole areas, reduce population by water medication that would produce sterility in women, and so on. In this scheme of mass-control, sodium fluoride occupied a prominent place. ?
Repeated doses of infinitesimal amounts of fluoride will in time reduce an individual??s power to resist domination, by slowly poisoning and narcotizing a certain area of the brain, thus making him submissive to the will of those who wish to govern him. (A convenient light lobotomy) Tell a lie Loud Enough And Long Enough And People Will Believe It.? (Adolph Hitler)
The real reason behind water fluoridation is not to benefit children??s teeth. If this were the real reason there are many ways in which it could be done that are much easier, cheaper, and far more effective. The real purpose behind water fluoridation is to reduce the resistance of the masses to domination and control and loss of liberty.
When the Nazis under Hitler decided to go into Poland, both the German General Staff and the Russian General Staff exchanged scientific and military ideas, plans, and personnel, and the scheme of mass control through water medication was seized upon by the Russian Communists because it fitted ideally into their plan to communize the world.
I was told of this entire scheme by a German chemist who was an official of the great I.G. Farben chemical industries and was also prominent in the Nazi movement at the time. I say this with all the earnestness and sincerity of a scientist who has spent nearly 20 years?? research into the chemistry, bio-chemistry, physiology and pathology of fluorine??any person who drinks artificially fluorinated water for a period of one year or more will never again be the same person mentally or physically.? Charles E. Perkins, Chemist, October 2nd 1954
Quoting Einstein??s nephew, Dr.E.H. Bronner (a chemist who had also been a prisoner of war during WW II) in a letter printed in the Catholic Mirror, Springfield, MA, January 1952: ??It appears that the citizens of Massachusetts are among the ??next?? on the agenda of the water poisoners.? There is a sinister network of subversive agents, Godless ??intellectual?? parasites, working in our country today whose ramifications grow more extensive, more successful and more alarming each new year and whose true objective is to demoralize, paralyze and destroy our great Republic??from within if they can, according to their plan??for their own possession. The tragic success they have already attained in their long siege to destroy the moral fiber of American life is now one of their most potent footholds towards their own ultimate victory over us. Fluoridation of our community water systems can well become their most subtle weapon for our sure physical and mental deterioration?
As a research chemist of established standing, I built within the past 22 years, 3 American chemical plants and licensed 6 of my 53 patents. Based on my years of practical experience in the health food and chemical field, let me warn: fluoridation of drinking water is criminal insanity, sure national suicide. Don??t do it.
Even in small quantities, sodium fluoride is a deadly poison to which no effective antidote has been found. Every exterminator knows that it is the most efficient rat-killer..Sodium fluoride is entirely different from organic calcium fluoro-phosphate needed by our bodies and provided by nature, in God??s great providence and love, to build and strengthen our bones and teeth. This organic calcium-fluoro-phosphate, derived from proper foods, is an edible organic salt, insoluble in water and assimilable by the human body, whereas the non-organic sodium fluoride used in fluoridating water is instant poison to the body and fully water soluble. The body refuses to assimilate it. Careful, bonafide laboratory experimentation by conscientious, patriotic research chemists, and actual medical experience, have both revealed that instead of preserving or promoting ??dental health?? fluoridated drinking water destroys teeth, before adulthood and after, by the destructive mottling and other pathological conditions it actually causes in them, and also creates many other very grave pathological conditions in the internal organisms of bodies consuming it. How can it be called a ??Health? plan? What??s behind it?
That any so-called ??doctors? would persuade a civilized nation to add voluntarily a deadly poison to its drinking water systems is unbelievable. It is the height of criminal insanity. No wonder Hitler and Stalin fully believed and agreed from 1939 to 1941 that, quoting from both Lenin??s Last Will and Hitler??s Mein Kampf: ??America we shall demoralize, divide, and destroy from within.??
Are our Civil Defense organizations and agencies awake to the perils of water poisoning by fluoridation? Its use has been recorded in other countries. Sodium fluoride water solutions are the cheapest and most effective rat killers known to chemists: colorless, odorless, tasteless; no antidote, no remedy, no hope: Instant and complete extermination of rats?.
Fluoridation of water systems can be slow national suicide or quick national liquidation. It is criminal insanity??treason! Dr.E.H. Bronner, Mfg. Research Chemist, Los Angeles. Earliest Available Russian Fluoride Evidence:
??I Oliver Kenneth Goff was a member of the Communist Party and the Young Communist League, from May 2nd, 1936 to October 9th. 1939. During this period of time, I operated under the alias of John Keats with number 18-B-2. My testimony before the Government is in Volume 9 of the Un-American Activities Report for 1939.
While a member of the Communist Party, I attended Communist training schools in New York and Wisconsin?and we were trained in the revolutionary overthrow of the U.S. Government?.We discussed quite thoroughly the fluoridation of water supplies and how we were using it in Russia as a tranquilizer in the prison camps. The leaders of our school felt that if it could be induced into the American water supply, it would bring about a spirit of lethargy in the nation, where it could keep the general public docile during a steady encroachment of Communism. We also discussed the fact that keeping a store of deadly fluoride near the water reservoir would be advantageous during the time of the revolution, as it would give us opportunity to dump this poison into the water supply and either kill off the populace or threaten them with liquidation, so that they would surrender to obtain fresh water. The above is frightening but true
At this time the Muriel S. Miller Foundation would like to bring to your attention part of the Preface of a book entitled ??Fluoride, The Aging Factor, How to Recognize and Avoid the Devastating Effects of Fluoride? by Dr. John Yiamouyiannis, Health Action Press Delaware, Ohio 43015. Although published in 1993, the author confirms the dangers cited in our report. Dr. John Yiamouyiannis received his B.S. in biochemistry from the University Of Chicago and his Ph.D in biochemistry from the University Of Rhode Island. After completing postdoctoral research at Western Reserve University Medical School, he became a biochemical editor at Chemical Abstracts Service, the worlds largest chemical information center. Here he first became aware of the health damaging effects of fluoride. Dr. Yiamouyiannis is a world-leading authority on the biological effects of fluoride. One leading fluoridationist admits ??He appears brilliant-and dedicated?. Even the American Dental Association cautions its fluoridation speakers, ??Running up against Yiamouyiannis is not recommended?. The truth is fluoridation is chronically poisoning millions. Here is part of the preface, judge for yourselves.
Of the above:
The Journal of the American Medical Association (1990-1992) has reported a greater incidence of hip fractures in fluoridate areas in the U.S. and Britain. The New England Journal of Medicine (1990) reported that fluoride treatment of Osteoporosis patients resulted in higher hip fracture rates. Government facilities such as Argonne National Laboratories (1988) and the National Institute of Environmental And Health Sciences (1990) have shown that fluoride causes cancer. Former promoters of fluoridation have since found that fluoridation does not reduce tooth decay (1987-1988). In the largest study on fluoridation and tooth decay ever done in the U.S. (1990), it was found that fluoridation is ineffective in reducing tooth decay. Scientists at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1989-1993) have come out against fluoridation because they have confirmed that fluoridation does not reduce tooth decay and that there is clear evidence that fluoridation causes cancer. Animal studies showing fluoride-linked increases in bone cancer and oral cancer have been confirmed by human studies (1991-1993). But the real reason for the media attention is that they have become aware of the hype that led to the promotion of this outrageous fraud. And the person responsible for bringing this fraud to their attention was Joel Griffiths. In 1992, Griffiths wrote an article for Covert Action which gave the media what they had been asking for years??a motive. He revealed how industries benefited from the promotion of fluoridation. Claims that fluoridation was safe and beneficial to health made it difficult for people to complain when polluting industries belched fluoride out into the air and dumped it into waterways. Such indiscriminate and careless handling of fluoride has allowed companies such as Exxon, U.S. Steel and Alcoa to make tens of billions of dollars in extra profit at our expense. The above confirms the information printed above in our second paragraph and is further proof of this sickening condition.
Note: The foundation has no interest, financial or otherwise with the author or publishers of this book. The above has been provided for your information in keeping with our vow to expose the evils of the pharmaceutical and chemical industries.
:mad::mad::mad::mad::mad:
AMERICA: OVERDOSED ON FLUORIDE
by Lynn Landes & Maria Bechis, updated June 2000
"...fluoride (that is added to municipal water) is a hazardous waste product...for which there is substantial evidence of adverse health effects and, contrary to public perception, virtually no evidence of significant benefits," says Dr. William Hirzy, Vice President, Chapter 280 of the National Treasury Employees Union, EPA headquarters in Washington, D.C.
At least 22% of all American children now have dental fluorosis as a result of ingesting too much fluoride, according to The Centers for Disease Control (CDC). That rate may be 69% in children from high socioeconomic-status families and those who live in fluoridated communities, according to a July 1998 report from The American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry and corroborated in several reports published since 1995 in the Journal of the American Dental Association (JADA-see below). Fluorosis is the discoloration and, in advanced cases, the pitting of teeth. Bleaching is not effective.
The more serious health concern is that dental fluorosis is not the only harmful health effect that results from overexposure to fluoride. Fluoride has been linked in government and scientific reports to a wide range of harmful health effects, including: bone and tooth decay (including dental and skeletal fluorosis, bone pathology, arthritis, and osteoporosis) Alzheimer's, memory loss and other neurological impairment, kidney damage, cancer, genetic damage, and gastrointestinal problems. In addition, fluoride has been found to leach lead from old water pipes and soldering material, which has resulted in increased lead levels in people.
Americans, even in unfluoridated communities, are suffering serious harmful health effects from overexposure to fluoride due to its widespread and uncontrolled use. Fluoride can be found in any food or beverage made with fluoridated municipal water. Less than 2% of Western Europe drink fluoridated water compared to over 60% of the United States population.
Federal and state public health agencies and large dental and medical organizations, such as the American Dental Association, continue to promote fluoride despite growing evidence that it is harmful to public health and the environment. This is also despite EPA??s own scientists, whose union, Chapter 280 of the National Treasury Employees Union, has taken a strong stand against fluoride.
Fluoride is not an essential nutrient. It has never received "FDA Approval" (U.S. Food and Drug Administration). It is listed as an "unapproved new drug" by the FDA, and as a "contaminant" by the EPA. Although calcium fluoride can occur naturally, the type of fluoride (sodium) added to municipal water is a hazardous waste product of the aluminum industry, phosphate fertilizer industry, and other industries.
There is no margin of safety for fluoride exposure. In the 1940??s, when fluoridation began, the "optimal" level of exposure for dental benefit was determined to be 1 milligram/day for an adult male. Even at that level, 10% of the population were expected to contract dental fluorosis. It was estimated that adult males drank 1 liter of water per day. At that time, other sources of fluoride were scarce.
1986: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) set new "maximum contaminant levels (MCLs)" for fluoride in water. Above 2 mg/liter "children are likely to develop objectionable dental fluorosis" and parents must be officially notified. Above 4 mg/liter, individuals are at risk of developing "crippling skeletal fluorosis." It is against federal law to fluoridate water above 4 mg/liter.
1991: The U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services (HHS), in their Review of Fluoride Benefits and Risks, published an analysis & table of fluoride exposure levels (for a 110-pound adult) from food, beverages, toothpaste, and mouthwash. Note: The HHS data indicates that HHS was aware in 1991 that the public was already overexposed to fluoride. The table below is an analysis of the HHS data table.
Fluoride Concentration in Drinking Water Total Fluoride Intake % Over 1 mg "Optimal" Dosage
Unfluoridated Communities < 0.3 mg/L 0.88 - 2.20 mg/day as much as 120 %
"Optimally" Fluoridated 0.7-1.2 mg/L 1.58 - 6.60 mg/day as much as 560 %
Fluoridated communities > 2.0 mg/L 2.10 - 7.05 mg/day possible > 605 %
1993: The U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services (HHS) stated in its Toxicological Profile on Fluoride, "Existing data indicate that subsets of the population may be unusually susceptible to the toxic effects of fluoride and its compounds. These populations include the elderly, people with deficiencies of calcium, magnesium, and/or vitamin C, and people with cardiovascular and kidney problems... Postmenopausal women and elderly men in fluoridated communities may also be at increased risk of fractures."
1994: The American Dental Association's (ADA) Council on Scientific Affairs approved a new Fluoride Supplementation Dosage Schedule with the following cautions, "All sources of fluoride must be evaluated with a thorough fluoride history.... Patient exposure to multiple sources can make proper prescribing complex." The ADA does not point out in their recommendations that multiple sources of fluoride include processed foods and beverages, which also makes it impossible to determine fluoride exposure or control it.
1995-2000: The Journal of the American Dental Association (JADA??s Dec. 1995, July 1996, July 1997, March 1999, June 2000) has published a series of studies reporting on pervasive overexposure to fluoride due to "the widespread use of fluoridated water, fluoride dentifrice, dietary fluoride supplements and other forms of fluoride...{There is} an increased prevalence of dental fluorosis, ranging from about 15% to 65% in fluoridated areas and 5% to 40% in non-fluoridated areas in North America." In February of 1997, The Academy of General Dentistry (AGD), representing 35,000 dentists, warned parents to limit their children??s intake of juices due to fluoride content.
RECOMMENDATION: The FDA should be required to put fluoride through the "controlled studies" necessary for standard "FDA Approval." If fluoride gains FDA approval, then it should be treated as a prescribed medication in order to prevent patient over-exposure.
NOTE: Reports and studies sometimes use different measurements for, essentially, the same value. For example: Both milligrams per liter (mg/l) or micrograms per gram (ug/g) = parts per million (ppm).
Controversial fluoride is one of the basic ingredients in both PROZAC (FLUoxetene Hydrochloride) and Sarin nerve gas (Isopropyl-Methyl-Phosphoryl FLUoride).
Sodium fluoride, a hazardous-waste by-product from the manufacture of Aluminum, is a common ingredient in rat and cockroach poisons, anesthetics, hypnotics, psychiatric drugs, and military nerve gas. It??s historically been quite expensive to properly dispose of, until some aluminum industries with an overabundance of the stuff sold the public on the terrifically insane but highly profitable idea of buying it at a 20,000% markup, injecting it into our water supplies, and then DRINKING it. Yes, a 20,000% markup: Fluoride ?? intended only for human consumption by people under 14 years of age ?? is injected into our drinking water supply at approximately 1 part-per-million (PPM), but since we only drink ½ of one percent of the total water supply, the rest literally goes down the drain as a free hazardous-waste disposal for the chemical industry, where we PAY them so that we can flush their expensive hazardous waste down our toilets. How many salesmen dream of such a deal? (Follow the money.)
Independent scientific evidence repeatedly showing up over the past 50 years reveals that fluoride allegedly shortens our life span, promotes cancer and various mental disturbances, accelerates osteoporosis and broken hips in old folks, and makes us stupid, docile, and subservient, all in one package. There are reports of aluminum in the brain possibly being a causative factor in Alzheimer??s disease, and evidence points towards fluoride??s strong affinity for aluminum and also its ability to ??trick? the blood-brain barrier by looking like the hydrogen ion, and thus allowing chemical access to brain tissue.
Scientists who have attempted to blow the whistle on this mega-bucks PR ploy have consistently been given a very unscientific Black-PR treatment, and thus their valid points disputing the current vested interests never arrive in the press. Follow the money to find the control. In 1952 the slick PR campaign which ramrodded the concept of fluoridation through via our Public Health departments and various dental organizations was likened to a highly-emotional ??beer-salesman??s convention? instead of the objective scientific experiment it should properly have been. It??s continued in that vein right up to present time. To illustrate the emotional vs. the scientific nature of this issue, just look at the response given by people (perhaps yourself included?) when the subject of fluoridation comes up. Ask yourself ??Is this response EMOTIONAL BLUSTER, or is it UNBIASED AND OPENLY-INTERESTED OBJECTIVITY?? There is a tremendous amount of emotional, highly unscientific know-it-all attached to fluoridation. Many truly independent (unattached to any vested-interest) scientists who??ve spent a large portion of their lives studying and working with this subject have been subjected to a surprising amount of uncalled-for and unfair character assassination from strong vested-interest groups who profit from the public??s ignorance as well as from their illnesses. (Follow the money).
Do you have diabetes or kidney disease? There are reportedly more than 11 million Americans with diabetes. Since many diabetics drink more liquids than other people, then according to the Physicians Desk reference these 11 million Americans probably shouldn??t drink fluoridated water, because in doing so, they??ll receive an excessive dose of fluoride.
Kidney disease, by definition, lowers the efficiency of the kidneys, which is your main route of fluoride elimination. ??So those people with kidney disease also shouldn??t drink fluoridated water. Cases are on record (Annapolis, Maryland, 1979) where kidney patients on dialysis machines died, due to a fluoride overdose in the city water supply. Let??s begin at the beginning:
The first occurrence of fluoridated drinking water on earth was found in Germany??s Nazi prison camps. The Gestapo had little concern about fluoride??s supposed effect on children??s teeth; their alleged reason for mass-medicating water with sodium fluoride was to sterilize humans and force the people in their concentration camps into calm submission. (Ref. Book: ??The Crime and Punishment of I.G. Farben? by Joseph Borkin.)
The following letter was received by the Lee Foundation for Nutritional Research, Milwaukee Wisconsin, on October 2nd 1954, from Mr. Charles Perkins, a chemist: ??I have your letter of September 29 asking for further documentation regarding a statement made in my book, The Truth about Water Fluoridation, to the effect that the idea of water fluoridation was brought to England from Russia by the Russian Communist Kreminoff.? In the 1930s, Hitler and the German Nazi??s envisioned a world to be dominated and controlled by a Nazi philosophy of Pan-Germanism. The German chemists worked out a very ingenious and far-reaching plan of mass-control which was submitted to and adopted by the German General Staff. This plan was to control the population in any given area through mass medication of drinking water supplies. By this method they could control the population in whole areas, reduce population by water medication that would produce sterility in women, and so on. In this scheme of mass-control, sodium fluoride occupied a prominent place. ?
Repeated doses of infinitesimal amounts of fluoride will in time reduce an individual??s power to resist domination, by slowly poisoning and narcotizing a certain area of the brain, thus making him submissive to the will of those who wish to govern him. (A convenient light lobotomy) Tell a lie Loud Enough And Long Enough And People Will Believe It.? (Adolph Hitler)
The real reason behind water fluoridation is not to benefit children??s teeth. If this were the real reason there are many ways in which it could be done that are much easier, cheaper, and far more effective. The real purpose behind water fluoridation is to reduce the resistance of the masses to domination and control and loss of liberty.
When the Nazis under Hitler decided to go into Poland, both the German General Staff and the Russian General Staff exchanged scientific and military ideas, plans, and personnel, and the scheme of mass control through water medication was seized upon by the Russian Communists because it fitted ideally into their plan to communize the world.
I was told of this entire scheme by a German chemist who was an official of the great I.G. Farben chemical industries and was also prominent in the Nazi movement at the time. I say this with all the earnestness and sincerity of a scientist who has spent nearly 20 years?? research into the chemistry, bio-chemistry, physiology and pathology of fluorine??any person who drinks artificially fluorinated water for a period of one year or more will never again be the same person mentally or physically.? Charles E. Perkins, Chemist, October 2nd 1954
Quoting Einstein??s nephew, Dr.E.H. Bronner (a chemist who had also been a prisoner of war during WW II) in a letter printed in the Catholic Mirror, Springfield, MA, January 1952: ??It appears that the citizens of Massachusetts are among the ??next?? on the agenda of the water poisoners.? There is a sinister network of subversive agents, Godless ??intellectual?? parasites, working in our country today whose ramifications grow more extensive, more successful and more alarming each new year and whose true objective is to demoralize, paralyze and destroy our great Republic??from within if they can, according to their plan??for their own possession. The tragic success they have already attained in their long siege to destroy the moral fiber of American life is now one of their most potent footholds towards their own ultimate victory over us. Fluoridation of our community water systems can well become their most subtle weapon for our sure physical and mental deterioration?
As a research chemist of established standing, I built within the past 22 years, 3 American chemical plants and licensed 6 of my 53 patents. Based on my years of practical experience in the health food and chemical field, let me warn: fluoridation of drinking water is criminal insanity, sure national suicide. Don??t do it.
Even in small quantities, sodium fluoride is a deadly poison to which no effective antidote has been found. Every exterminator knows that it is the most efficient rat-killer..Sodium fluoride is entirely different from organic calcium fluoro-phosphate needed by our bodies and provided by nature, in God??s great providence and love, to build and strengthen our bones and teeth. This organic calcium-fluoro-phosphate, derived from proper foods, is an edible organic salt, insoluble in water and assimilable by the human body, whereas the non-organic sodium fluoride used in fluoridating water is instant poison to the body and fully water soluble. The body refuses to assimilate it. Careful, bonafide laboratory experimentation by conscientious, patriotic research chemists, and actual medical experience, have both revealed that instead of preserving or promoting ??dental health?? fluoridated drinking water destroys teeth, before adulthood and after, by the destructive mottling and other pathological conditions it actually causes in them, and also creates many other very grave pathological conditions in the internal organisms of bodies consuming it. How can it be called a ??Health? plan? What??s behind it?
That any so-called ??doctors? would persuade a civilized nation to add voluntarily a deadly poison to its drinking water systems is unbelievable. It is the height of criminal insanity. No wonder Hitler and Stalin fully believed and agreed from 1939 to 1941 that, quoting from both Lenin??s Last Will and Hitler??s Mein Kampf: ??America we shall demoralize, divide, and destroy from within.??
Are our Civil Defense organizations and agencies awake to the perils of water poisoning by fluoridation? Its use has been recorded in other countries. Sodium fluoride water solutions are the cheapest and most effective rat killers known to chemists: colorless, odorless, tasteless; no antidote, no remedy, no hope: Instant and complete extermination of rats?.
Fluoridation of water systems can be slow national suicide or quick national liquidation. It is criminal insanity??treason! Dr.E.H. Bronner, Mfg. Research Chemist, Los Angeles. Earliest Available Russian Fluoride Evidence:
??I Oliver Kenneth Goff was a member of the Communist Party and the Young Communist League, from May 2nd, 1936 to October 9th. 1939. During this period of time, I operated under the alias of John Keats with number 18-B-2. My testimony before the Government is in Volume 9 of the Un-American Activities Report for 1939.
While a member of the Communist Party, I attended Communist training schools in New York and Wisconsin?and we were trained in the revolutionary overthrow of the U.S. Government?.We discussed quite thoroughly the fluoridation of water supplies and how we were using it in Russia as a tranquilizer in the prison camps. The leaders of our school felt that if it could be induced into the American water supply, it would bring about a spirit of lethargy in the nation, where it could keep the general public docile during a steady encroachment of Communism. We also discussed the fact that keeping a store of deadly fluoride near the water reservoir would be advantageous during the time of the revolution, as it would give us opportunity to dump this poison into the water supply and either kill off the populace or threaten them with liquidation, so that they would surrender to obtain fresh water. The above is frightening but true
At this time the Muriel S. Miller Foundation would like to bring to your attention part of the Preface of a book entitled ??Fluoride, The Aging Factor, How to Recognize and Avoid the Devastating Effects of Fluoride? by Dr. John Yiamouyiannis, Health Action Press Delaware, Ohio 43015. Although published in 1993, the author confirms the dangers cited in our report. Dr. John Yiamouyiannis received his B.S. in biochemistry from the University Of Chicago and his Ph.D in biochemistry from the University Of Rhode Island. After completing postdoctoral research at Western Reserve University Medical School, he became a biochemical editor at Chemical Abstracts Service, the worlds largest chemical information center. Here he first became aware of the health damaging effects of fluoride. Dr. Yiamouyiannis is a world-leading authority on the biological effects of fluoride. One leading fluoridationist admits ??He appears brilliant-and dedicated?. Even the American Dental Association cautions its fluoridation speakers, ??Running up against Yiamouyiannis is not recommended?. The truth is fluoridation is chronically poisoning millions. Here is part of the preface, judge for yourselves.
Of the above:
The Journal of the American Medical Association (1990-1992) has reported a greater incidence of hip fractures in fluoridate areas in the U.S. and Britain. The New England Journal of Medicine (1990) reported that fluoride treatment of Osteoporosis patients resulted in higher hip fracture rates. Government facilities such as Argonne National Laboratories (1988) and the National Institute of Environmental And Health Sciences (1990) have shown that fluoride causes cancer. Former promoters of fluoridation have since found that fluoridation does not reduce tooth decay (1987-1988). In the largest study on fluoridation and tooth decay ever done in the U.S. (1990), it was found that fluoridation is ineffective in reducing tooth decay. Scientists at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1989-1993) have come out against fluoridation because they have confirmed that fluoridation does not reduce tooth decay and that there is clear evidence that fluoridation causes cancer. Animal studies showing fluoride-linked increases in bone cancer and oral cancer have been confirmed by human studies (1991-1993). But the real reason for the media attention is that they have become aware of the hype that led to the promotion of this outrageous fraud. And the person responsible for bringing this fraud to their attention was Joel Griffiths. In 1992, Griffiths wrote an article for Covert Action which gave the media what they had been asking for years??a motive. He revealed how industries benefited from the promotion of fluoridation. Claims that fluoridation was safe and beneficial to health made it difficult for people to complain when polluting industries belched fluoride out into the air and dumped it into waterways. Such indiscriminate and careless handling of fluoride has allowed companies such as Exxon, U.S. Steel and Alcoa to make tens of billions of dollars in extra profit at our expense. The above confirms the information printed above in our second paragraph and is further proof of this sickening condition.
Note: The foundation has no interest, financial or otherwise with the author or publishers of this book. The above has been provided for your information in keeping with our vow to expose the evils of the pharmaceutical and chemical industries.
:mad::mad::mad::mad::mad:
AMERICA: OVERDOSED ON FLUORIDE
by Lynn Landes & Maria Bechis, updated June 2000
"...fluoride (that is added to municipal water) is a hazardous waste product...for which there is substantial evidence of adverse health effects and, contrary to public perception, virtually no evidence of significant benefits," says Dr. William Hirzy, Vice President, Chapter 280 of the National Treasury Employees Union, EPA headquarters in Washington, D.C.
At least 22% of all American children now have dental fluorosis as a result of ingesting too much fluoride, according to The Centers for Disease Control (CDC). That rate may be 69% in children from high socioeconomic-status families and those who live in fluoridated communities, according to a July 1998 report from The American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry and corroborated in several reports published since 1995 in the Journal of the American Dental Association (JADA-see below). Fluorosis is the discoloration and, in advanced cases, the pitting of teeth. Bleaching is not effective.
The more serious health concern is that dental fluorosis is not the only harmful health effect that results from overexposure to fluoride. Fluoride has been linked in government and scientific reports to a wide range of harmful health effects, including: bone and tooth decay (including dental and skeletal fluorosis, bone pathology, arthritis, and osteoporosis) Alzheimer's, memory loss and other neurological impairment, kidney damage, cancer, genetic damage, and gastrointestinal problems. In addition, fluoride has been found to leach lead from old water pipes and soldering material, which has resulted in increased lead levels in people.
Americans, even in unfluoridated communities, are suffering serious harmful health effects from overexposure to fluoride due to its widespread and uncontrolled use. Fluoride can be found in any food or beverage made with fluoridated municipal water. Less than 2% of Western Europe drink fluoridated water compared to over 60% of the United States population.
Federal and state public health agencies and large dental and medical organizations, such as the American Dental Association, continue to promote fluoride despite growing evidence that it is harmful to public health and the environment. This is also despite EPA??s own scientists, whose union, Chapter 280 of the National Treasury Employees Union, has taken a strong stand against fluoride.
Fluoride is not an essential nutrient. It has never received "FDA Approval" (U.S. Food and Drug Administration). It is listed as an "unapproved new drug" by the FDA, and as a "contaminant" by the EPA. Although calcium fluoride can occur naturally, the type of fluoride (sodium) added to municipal water is a hazardous waste product of the aluminum industry, phosphate fertilizer industry, and other industries.
There is no margin of safety for fluoride exposure. In the 1940??s, when fluoridation began, the "optimal" level of exposure for dental benefit was determined to be 1 milligram/day for an adult male. Even at that level, 10% of the population were expected to contract dental fluorosis. It was estimated that adult males drank 1 liter of water per day. At that time, other sources of fluoride were scarce.
1986: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) set new "maximum contaminant levels (MCLs)" for fluoride in water. Above 2 mg/liter "children are likely to develop objectionable dental fluorosis" and parents must be officially notified. Above 4 mg/liter, individuals are at risk of developing "crippling skeletal fluorosis." It is against federal law to fluoridate water above 4 mg/liter.
1991: The U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services (HHS), in their Review of Fluoride Benefits and Risks, published an analysis & table of fluoride exposure levels (for a 110-pound adult) from food, beverages, toothpaste, and mouthwash. Note: The HHS data indicates that HHS was aware in 1991 that the public was already overexposed to fluoride. The table below is an analysis of the HHS data table.
Fluoride Concentration in Drinking Water Total Fluoride Intake % Over 1 mg "Optimal" Dosage
Unfluoridated Communities < 0.3 mg/L 0.88 - 2.20 mg/day as much as 120 %
"Optimally" Fluoridated 0.7-1.2 mg/L 1.58 - 6.60 mg/day as much as 560 %
Fluoridated communities > 2.0 mg/L 2.10 - 7.05 mg/day possible > 605 %
1993: The U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services (HHS) stated in its Toxicological Profile on Fluoride, "Existing data indicate that subsets of the population may be unusually susceptible to the toxic effects of fluoride and its compounds. These populations include the elderly, people with deficiencies of calcium, magnesium, and/or vitamin C, and people with cardiovascular and kidney problems... Postmenopausal women and elderly men in fluoridated communities may also be at increased risk of fractures."
1994: The American Dental Association's (ADA) Council on Scientific Affairs approved a new Fluoride Supplementation Dosage Schedule with the following cautions, "All sources of fluoride must be evaluated with a thorough fluoride history.... Patient exposure to multiple sources can make proper prescribing complex." The ADA does not point out in their recommendations that multiple sources of fluoride include processed foods and beverages, which also makes it impossible to determine fluoride exposure or control it.
1995-2000: The Journal of the American Dental Association (JADA??s Dec. 1995, July 1996, July 1997, March 1999, June 2000) has published a series of studies reporting on pervasive overexposure to fluoride due to "the widespread use of fluoridated water, fluoride dentifrice, dietary fluoride supplements and other forms of fluoride...{There is} an increased prevalence of dental fluorosis, ranging from about 15% to 65% in fluoridated areas and 5% to 40% in non-fluoridated areas in North America." In February of 1997, The Academy of General Dentistry (AGD), representing 35,000 dentists, warned parents to limit their children??s intake of juices due to fluoride content.
RECOMMENDATION: The FDA should be required to put fluoride through the "controlled studies" necessary for standard "FDA Approval." If fluoride gains FDA approval, then it should be treated as a prescribed medication in order to prevent patient over-exposure.
NOTE: Reports and studies sometimes use different measurements for, essentially, the same value. For example: Both milligrams per liter (mg/l) or micrograms per gram (ug/g) = parts per million (ppm).