How many five-year-olds could you take on in a fight?

[rebgirl420]

23!

How Many Five Year Olds Could You Take in a Fight? (http://www.howmanyfiveyearoldscouldyoutakeinafight.com/)

[StickyfingahZ]

<a href="http://www.justsayhi.com/bb/fight5" style="display: block; background: url(http://assets.justsayhi.com/badges/967/259/fight5.ymjqv5n0ub.jpg) no-repeat; width: 296px; height: 84px; font-family: Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 42px; color: #fff; text-decoration: none; text-align: center; padding-top: 145px;">33</a><p><small>Looking for <a href="http://www.cashadvance1500.com">payday loan</a>?</small></p>



I dunno what that means....It told me to copy and paste,but it said I could take on 33 5 year olds.

[xcrispi]

Says I could beast on 30 of the lil monsters .
Crispi :jointsmile:

[Nochowderforyou]

Says 26 for me. :p

[Nightrafe]

25 brats

[the image reaper]

ALL of them

[Gandalf_The_Grey]

25... meh

If I had a baseball bat I'd be unstopable, like Sauron clubbing all those soldiers in the war of the ring 3,000 years ago.

[robo scat]

24. Not bad.

[chisme]

im doin the test now lol i luv this one allready sum kids you really do wanna give a smack like phills son from eastenders or chesney from corrie lmao!

[chisme]

<a href="http://www.justsayhi.com/bb/fight5" style="display: block; background: url(http://assets.justsayhi.com/badges/151/155/fight5.qy1eva1e5f.jpg) no-repeat; width: 296px; height: 84px; font-family: Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 42px; color: #fff; text-decoration: none; text-align: center; padding-top: 145px;">29</a><p><small>Looking for <a href="http://www.cashadvance1500.com">payday loans</a>?</small></p>








i got 29 of the little bastards

[Cannabis-Sativa]

28 but i have martial arts experience :pimp:

[Breukelen advocaat]

I did very poorly, only 18.

I have to see where there is room for improvement, and start a regimen.

[poseidon]

despite how fucking annoying children are.. No way.. I can't hit any.

[Infamous]

<a href="http://www.justsayhi.com/bb/fight5" style="display: block; background: url(http://assets.justsayhi.com/badges/231/990/fight5.az5hjzi9qm.jpg) no-repeat; width: 296px; height: 84px; font-family: Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 42px; color: #fff; text-decoration: none; text-align: center; padding-top: 145px;">36</a><p><small><a href="http://www.justsayhi.com">100% Free</a> at JustSayHi</small></p>


36.

Because i'm a REAL man. I think if I had been older than twenty and been trampled I would have got more.

[chongman420]

I beat down 28 lil mofos

[worm]

man it would be so easy. one punch to the head takes out a kid, no problem.
not only that, 5 years olds weigh nothing. grab one by the ankles and spin around, aim for head butts.

i'm thinking closer to 100.

someone needs to get working on virtual reality video games :P

[trainwreck530]

31 critters lol

[pass_the_dubbie]

You could take on 29 five year old kids in a fight.

well at least ive learnt something today

[Nightcrewman]

My grandaughter Rhianna always gets the better of me, so the answer has got to be one.


Cheers

NCM

[Infamous]

I just decided to try this for real and I got 12 kids, 2 policemen, a police horse, a paramedic and a guide dog.

[the image reaper]

I didn't know you were talking about a GAME ... :wtf: ... no wonder my neighborhood's little bastards tend to avoid me ;)

[Pie_man]

28.

[Cannabis-Sativa]

A lot of people underestimate the power of a SWARM of 5 year olds, i think if they were pissed off enough that 10 five year olds could take me, except my test said like 28 i think.

[MadSativa]

36.


I got the same , however I dont see how acurate this is, I say I could take at least a couple hundred, its says you are in an enclosed area, this means you would be piling 5 year old carcasses, so you could fortify a small perimeter around you, Also wepons are all around you such as, 5 year old skull fist mits and little five year old bats.

[Born To Stone]

Lol damn I remember this thread on overgrow, I was gonna post it actually, btw I got 26, I think stamina is the main factor, but - if they bite, you could go down pretty fast...I mean bite to the nads and you aint lastin long :eek:

[ATrain]

I can only beat 16! That blows. I could take on more than half a kindergarten class for sure. I'd tear through them :thumbsup:

[crudemood]

18. thats not alot! actually in reality i could probably only handle.. 5
hahaha.

[+ google it +]

wow. if i had morals, i would offended by this thread...but i don't have any. the test said i could take on 28 merciless 5-year-olds. Question: do they get a snack time/nap time break? (:D, i don't really talk like dwight from the office)

[LazySmoking420]

I can only take 19 of those little bastards...

[Purple Banana]

Twenty Seven Five Year Olds.

Not bad.

Great thread, Reb! I always like to have this information handy.

[rebgirl420]

^ hahah Im glad so many people liked the thread hahaha

And I love how everyone is actually taking a few minutes of their time to actually think this shit through haha "well maybe if I brought my mace..."

[SMOKIN A WHILE]

What a stupid f*ing. Pick the one with a gun it'll be 0.

[GraziLovesMary]

What a stupid f*ing. Pick the one with a gun it'll be 0.

Ill be god DAMNED if I would let a 5 year old shoot me to death, after avoiding the same fate by older, more seasoned individuals. But I digress...

According to the test, I can take 38 five-year olds. But I think if they took into account the density of my bones(especially the bones of my striking surfaces, e.g. hands, feet, forearms, knees, etc..), and the explosiveness in my strikes, the number would be in the triple digits easily.

I predict that they would be knocked unconscious if not killed with the first punch for at least the first 50 kids before I begin to tire, and the adrenaline starts wearing down, and I have to resort to strategy.

lol what a silly thread, I loves it :p

[scagster]

I got 31. Surely I could take on three times that many. I would grab a little kid in each arm, and spin around and destroy them all like a giant lawn mower blade.

[GraziLovesMary]

I got 31. Surely I could take on three times that many. I would grab a little kid in each arm, and spin around and destroy them all like a giant lawn mower blade.

no no no!!! You dont wanna do that man! Its an endurance contest! Sure, youll fuck em up at first, but then theyll swarm your legs eventually when you tire, and shit could get nasty! Stick with a one-hitter-quitter plan of action and youll be ok.



:P

[snowblind]

<a href="http://www.justsayhi.com/bb/fight5" style="display: block; background: url(http://assets.justsayhi.com/badges/909/439/fight5.n99wlprqhj.jpg) no-repeat; width: 296px; height: 84px; font-family: Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 42px; color: #fff; text-decoration: none; text-align: center; padding-top: 145px;">34</a><p><small>Looking for <a href="http://www.cashadvance1500.com">payday loan</a>?</small></p>

i cud nail 34 of the fuckers. but i rekon you could rip the first ones legs off and then you'd be armed.

also could i have my paul chen with me cus with that were gonna be lookin at a kill bill type body count.

even more so if there ginger

[tankboy30]

oh you dont even know hahahha, well if i was being attacked i think 28-30 then theyd pile on top of me ahhhhhhhhh

[07silmax]

26 from the link, infinite with my bare hands

[SyndicateJuggalos17]

33 5 year olds

[ATrain]

How tall are most 5 year olds? Seems like if you are around 6 feet, medium build, you just smash them no matter what their numbers are. I think they'd only get the better of you if got tired out from all the beatings. So I guess it is all a question of endurance. :upsidedow

[Pie_man]

I got 31. Surely I could take on three times that many. I would grab a little kid in each arm, and spin around and destroy them all like a giant lawn mower blade.

Thank you. That was seriously the funniest thing I've read in a long time.

[tankboy30]

holy shit theres a link? i just put donw a fake number in my last post, but i guess after takign the test i can only take 24 on but theres only 3 in the picure so id be alright lol

[ghosty]

says I could take 29 of the lil buggers

[KindMidasSoundman]

13 - yeah, 13

[king of the world]

36 of them midgets



im a beast!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[420_24/7]

19

Thats not accurate, i could take on hundreds of them, but i wouldn't, i have trouble fighting anyone that doesn't stand a chance.

[guyoncouch]

I only got 31, bummer.

[HerbalConfusion]

23.

From experience though its more like 1 and a half.

[DaZeDShAdOw]

29 eh not to shabby lol

[S.P.Q.R.]

25..

[Trip06]

33 and all they want for christmass is there 2 front teeth.

[smok3y]

I got 23

[PackAnotherBowl]

19 of em.

[DRybes]

Have you ever dealt with 5 year olds? They're so small and fragile. I mean, dropping morals for a second and being theoretical, it's probably easy as hell to knock out a 5 year old. It's definitely also a crime to attempt this so you can't exactly test it, but considering its possible to kill an infant by merely shaking it, you'd think the threshold of physical ability to knock out a 5 year old would be relatively low. One blow to the head or one hard blow to the body. They're not going to take the pain and continue on, at least anywhere near full capacity. So even with a dozen of them attacking you at a time (and that's about all that could reach you at once even if you were surrounded by them in 3d) you're pretty much guaranteed to be able to take on 5 year olds not based on quantity but based on your stamina. If you got to a point where you could grab one and swing him/her around as a club, you'd be unstoppable.

[Doctor Whoov]

33 I'm merciless.:chainsaw:

[GraziLovesMary]

Have you ever dealt with 5 year olds? They're so small and fragile. I mean, dropping morals for a second and being theoretical, it's probably easy as hell to knock out a 5 year old. It's definitely also a crime to attempt this so you can't exactly test it, but considering its possible to kill an infant by merely shaking it, you'd think the threshold of physical ability to knock out a 5 year old would be relatively low. One blow to the head or one hard blow to the body. They're not going to take the pain and continue on, at least anywhere near full capacity. So even with a dozen of them attacking you at a time (and that's about all that could reach you at once even if you were surrounded by them in 3d) you're pretty much guaranteed to be able to take on 5 year olds not based on quantity but based on your stamina. If you got to a point where you could grab one and swing him/her around as a club, you'd be unstoppable.

Yeah but think of the amount of energy you would waste, swinging a 50-65 lb squirming club around like a mad-man. Plus, thats alot of shin-blows youre gonna have to defend against lol.

[bestbet]

probably 40-50
cause i only have to hit each of them once for them to roll up and cry without end

BRING EM ON

[Dren]

26, apparently at some point in the year since I last saw this thread I've managed to learn how to take down 2 more of the little fuckers.

think if they had armor, weapons, and training...

[bestbet]

lol.. it'll then be like fighting midget ninjas

then i'll have to say 7