Fox Host Says Dissenters Should Be Tased, VIDEO

[pisshead]

these moron hosts can't believe a 'code pink' person would be heckling hillary...maybe because hillary is no different than george w. bush...

they think that woman was threatening? standing up and talking to a lordly all knowing new world order scumbag is threatening?

to them i guess it is...bye bye freedom, hello tyranny. when we turn into china or north korea, there will still be neo-cons saying we need it, and fake liberals saying we need it when we get bilderberg hillary for president.



Fox Host Says Dissenters Should Be Tased
Kilmead laments that people who confront politicians aren't "beaten to a pulp," as establishment continues to sell war on anyone who disagrees with authority Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet (http://prisonplanet.com/articles/november2007/201107_dissenters_tased.htm)
Tuesday, November 20, 2007

During a discussion about a Code Pink member heckling Hillary Clinton at a recent event, Fox News host Brian Kilmead said that people who confront politicians are "threatening" and should be Tased or "beaten to a pulp," as the establishment media continues to sell the idea that anyone who disagrees with authority should be brutally punished.
A segment on the Fox and Friends morning show yesterday turned into an opportunity for Kilmead to share his dictatorial fetish that dissenters be dealt with in the proper manner, as footage aired of Clinton's heckler being removed from the event by security.
â??They should Tase this guy,â?� Kilmead says. â??At one point with security so high and tensions on edge, donâ??t you think theyâ??re going to get at the very least Tased or beaten to a pulp by somebody? These people look threatening.â?�

A number of other recent high profile public confrontations were reeled off, some of which involved We Are Change members, to paint a picture of a growing threat that needed to be quashed.
As the screams of tasered University of Florida student Andrew Meyer played in the background, the presenters seemed to react with glee, after which Kilmead concluded, â??I would be for Tasing anyone in Code Pink,â?� adding â??Iâ??m pro-Pink Tasing.â?�
As we have reported in-depth (http://infowars.net/articles/november2007/161107terror_hell.htm), this is all part of an intimidation campaign to silence dissent as the apparatus of the police state turns against anyone who questions authority.
Since Tasing is all part of "pain compliance," otherwise known as torture, why not go the whole hog and waterboard these potential terrorists? After all, if Ron Paul supporters are a terrorist threat, as CNN's Glenn Beck has so enthusiastically pushed recently (http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/november2007/161107_beck_smears.htm), then how far should we go to protect America?
If it was good enough for the Nazis to torture their political foes then it's good enough for us, as Harvard Professor Alan Dershowitz made clear last week.
"There are some who claim that torture is a nonissue because it never works -- it only produces false information," wrote Dershowitz in the Wall Street Journal (http://online.wsj.com/article/SB119439827396084663.html?mod=googlenews_wsj). "This is simply not true, as evidenced by the many decent members of the French Resistance who, under Nazi torture, disclosed the locations of their closest friends and relatives."
Wonderful - forget about those antiquated Geneva Conventions - let's use what the Nazis did as a role model for how to conduct ourselves and see where it gets us.
Ein Volk, ein Reich, ein Führer!

[Psycho4Bud]

I watched that on Fox and Friends the other morning. THEY WERE JOKING ABOUT IT!! Just making a humorous comparison between that and Florida. Heaven forbid that somebody cracks on joke.......

There is a conspiracy wherever that assclown looks.:rolleyes:

Have a good one!:s4:

[Breukelen advocaat]

If it was good enough for the Nazis to torture their political foes then it's good enough for us, as Harvard Professor Alan Dershowitz made clear last week.
"There are some who claim that torture is a nonissue because it never works -- it only produces false information," wrote Dershowitz in the Wall Street Journal (http://online.wsj.com/article/SB119439827396084663.html?mod=googlenews_wsj). "This is simply not true, as evidenced by the many decent members of the French Resistance who, under Nazi torture, disclosed the locations of their closest friends and relatives."
Wonderful - forget about those antiquated Geneva Conventions - let's use what the Nazis did as a role model for how to conduct ourselves and see where it gets us.

Ein Volk, ein Reich, ein Führer!

There they go again with the Nazis. I haven't yet seen them make comparisons between vaccinations and gassing, but I'm sure they'll get around to that in time.

The use of torture is certainly justifiable to obtain vital information when lives are at stake. Do you think that violent acts, from mass murder to sawing hostages' heads off, committed by terrorist groups such as al quada, are approved by the Geneva Convention?

[killerweed420]

Same kind of rhetoric that was done in the 60's. The anti-war desenters were going to destroy the planet.lol
And as we all know now the desenters were right and finally enough political pressure was applied to get us out of that moronic war. And now as we all Know the desenters are right again and eventually enough political pressure will be put on congress to get us out of the latest moronic war.

[Psycho4Bud]

There they go again with the Nazis. I haven't yet seen them make comparisons between vaccinations and gassing, but I'm sure they'll get around to that in time.

Fear sells.........

Have a good one!:s4:

[epxroot]

Fear sells.........

Have a good one!:s4:

So does the "War on Terror"

[killerweed420]

I would prefer all of these tv hosts were tazered. None of them are worth a shit.

[norkali]

The use of torture is certainly justifiable to obtain vital information when lives are at stake. Do you think that violent acts, from mass murder to sawing hostages' heads off, committed by terrorist groups such as al quada, are approved by the Geneva Convention?

"An eye for an eye leaves the whole world blind"
Mahatma Ghandi

And so your implying, if/when lives are at stake, with the possibility of mass murder/decapitation, etc., that we should torture people?

Why didn't we start water boarding Scott Peterson once they found Laci....?

Electrocuting Hell's Angels members for homicide investigations?

??? Or should that stuff just be for people in foreign countries? "Terrorists"?

[Breukelen advocaat]

"And so your implying, if/when lives are at stake, with the possibility of mass murder/decapitation, etc., that we should torture people?
??? Or should that stuff just be for people in foreign countries? "Terrorists"?

9/11 was an unprovoked all-out attack on humanity, and if it could have been prevented by aggressive interrogation of their colleages, then it should have been done - as it should be as needed to prevent future attacks.

They're trying to get nuclear weapons, and there is little doubt that they'll use them if they do. We don't have time to play games with them.

[Ozarks]

"An eye for an eye leaves the whole world blind"
Mahatma Ghandi


He ended up dead, failure is a pretty poor role model.

[norkali]

He ended up dead, failure is a pretty poor role model.

lol. Unfortunately, yes, we all die sometime.

Dying = failure :confused:

[Gandalf_The_Grey]

He ended up dead, failure is a pretty poor role model.


I'd hardly call a coward hidden in a crowd of supporters shooting him, "failure". Besides what you are talking about? He suceeded and got Britian booted out of India! :D
Everybody dies at some point.

[mfqr]

9/11 was an unprovoked all-out attack on humanity,

Just curious... what makes you think it was unprovoked? They did it for no reason at all? Surely they were provoked in some way.

[Breukelen advocaat]

Just curious... what makes you think it was unprovoked? They did it for no reason at all? Surely they were provoked in some way.
I remember a guy who was arrested in the street for punching another man. His reason was, "He gave me a dirty look!".

People can hate you just because of the way you part your hair. A religion like the one that the terrorists embrace gives them a lot of cause to create misery and destruction for - no reason, just everyday insanity pumped up with barbarian instincts and fanaticism.

The 9/11 victims in D.C. and New York City were complete strangers to the hijackers. The perpetrators wanted to go to allah and get their 72 virgins. That's a big motivation for suicide bombers.

These are extremely stupid, though dangerous, people.

[Gandalf_The_Grey]

Geez, everybody knows the terrorists are angry at America for their freedom. :rolleyes:

[Ozarks]

I'd hardly call a coward hidden in a crowd of supporters shooting him, "failure". Besides what you are talking about? He suceeded and got Britian booted out of India! :D
Everybody dies at some point.

Yes, he did do that. He also supported the partisan of India to create Pakistan.

Acknowledging that the love, turn the other check, group hug thinking isn't possible sometimes.

Then he "failed" to take what he "knew" to be true and put it into action. His life was in danger and he knew it, but taking steps to protect himself wouldn't have fit his agenda..

[BathingApes]

Geez, everybody knows the terrorists are angry at America for their freedom. :rolleyes:

Yep, don't we all. It has absolutely NOTHING to do with the fact that we've been meddling in their region for decades. :thumbsup: Of course that doesn't make terrorism right, so any of you right wingers about to accuse me think again, but it does give some perspective on WHY they hate us.

Do you really think they hate us because we're "free" (which we aren't btw.) Or do you think it is to do with a) Our part in overthrowing a democratically voted republic with military force to install the Shah, who killed hundreds of thousands and went on to be one of the most evil leaders of our generation, and b) Invading Iraq under the premise of finding weapons of mass destruction, finding none, killing a ridiculous amount of people, building military bases near the Iranian border, and taking Iraqi oil for ourselves.

I can kinda understand Afghanistan, but why Iraq? Really why. To get rid of Saddam? That's a good thing but our government would never do that. They would never spend THIS much money if that was their agenda. So why?

My opinion is we are slowly taking over sections of the middle East. Afghanistan, Iraq, Iran is next. And our military bases in Afghanistan and Iraq will help IMMENSELY. This was their plan to begin with. How can it not be? Do you really think it is a coincidence that there are military bases in Iraq closer to Iranian cities than Iraqi cities? Where is the logic behind that. I really wish someone would answer these questions. Forget the conspiracies and forget the bullshit - the fact is you must be BLIND not to see what is going on. I don't pretend to be enlightened or a know-it-all, but it's damn near obvious. Look back in history and anaylse our present situation. We tend to repeat ourselves an awful lot, even in our so called civilized society.

We invade Iran and we continue to feed the minds of terrorists. Iran aren't going to start a nuclear war. Noone is. Except maybe us.

[Psycho4Bud]

Do you really think they hate us because we're "free" (which we aren't btw.)

They don't hate us because of our freedom or our influence in the region. Thier philosophy is that it was a much better time when the Persian empire was in charge. At the present, they'd like to see us all under Sharia Law while still being able to worship our own gods. That at least is the beliefs of the Mullahs in Iran.......as far as Al-Quada is concerned, either your with them or against them.....plain and simple. Allah is king and will not return untill everyone follows his practices.


I can kinda understand Afghanistan, but why Iraq? Really why. To get rid of Saddam? That's a good thing but our government would never do that. They would never spend THIS much money if that was their agenda. So why?

There were reports from OTHER intelligence regarding WMD's not to mention a report from Putkin stating that Saddam had full intention of attacking the U.S. in another 9-11 fashion.


My opinion is we are slowly taking over sections of the middle East. Afghanistan, Iraq, Iran is next. And our military bases in Afghanistan and Iraq will help IMMENSELY. This was their plan to begin with. How can it not be? Do you really think it is a coincidence that there are military bases in Iraq closer to Iranian cities than Iraqi cities?

With the range that the Iranians have with their missile systems does it really make a difference where in Iraq or Afghanistan that the bases were located at?

Have a good one!:s4:

[Gandalf_The_Grey]

There were reports from OTHER intelligence regarding WMD's not to mention a report from Putin stating that Saddam had full intention of attacking the U.S. in another 9-11 fashion.



Putin seems like Russia's George Bush, except even more corrupt and up to even more no good. I wouldn't trust him as far as I could throw him. And that's not far considering he's a Judo blackbelt and would probably throw me!:jointsmile:

[BathingApes]

as far as Al-Quada is concerned, either your with them or against them.....plain and simple. Allah is king and will not return untill everyone follows his practices.

I'm against them for sure. Recognizing why they hate us doesn't mean Im with them.



There were reports from OTHER intelligence regarding WMD's not to mention a report from Putkin stating that Saddam had full intention of attacking the U.S. in another 9-11 fashion.

Were there? Putin? Any credibile ones? Did you perhaps hear this on Fox news?



With the range that the Iranians have with their missile systems does it really make a difference where in Iraq or Afghanistan that the bases were located at?


In terms of a ground invasion - it makes all the differnence.

[Psycho4Bud]

I'm against them for sure. Recognizing why they hate us doesn't mean Im with them.


There ARE Al-Quada in Iraq, if you agree that they hate us just for the fact....then why bail and run?



Were there? Putin? Any credibile ones? Did you perhaps hear this on Fox news?

"I can confirm that after the events of September 11, 2001, and up to the military operation in Iraq, Russian special services and Russian intelligence several times received ... information that official organs of Saddam's regime were preparing terrorist acts on the territory of the United States and beyond its borders, at U.S. military and civilian locations," Putin said.
CNN.com - Russia 'warned U.S. about Saddam' - Jun 18, 2004 (http://www.cnn.com/2004/WORLD/europe/06/18/russia.warning/index.html)

You have a couple of neighbors telling ya that some assclown in your area is buying a shit load of guns/ammo and then have another one, which is a friend of the assclown, state that the assclown is out to kill ya what do ya do?

I always love it when something comes out against the lefts agenda they blame the source on Fox News.


In terms of a ground invasion - it makes all the differnence.

A ground invasion into Iran from this military base? They have a million men in their Basij Militia not to mention their regular forces. Still doesn't make sense.

Have a good one!:s4:

[BathingApes]

There ARE Al-Quada in Iraq, if you agree that they hate us just for the fact....then why bail and run?

"bail and run." Not quite. Just because we leave somewhere does not mean we're running in fear. In fact if we were to leave it would probably have more to do with the fact that we can't afford this war and that the dollar is becoming increasingly weaker. This type of playground psychology "if we leave we are pussies" mentality is stupid.



"I can confirm that after the events of September 11, 2001, and up to the military operation in Iraq, Russian special services and Russian intelligence several times received ... information that official organs of Saddam's regime were preparing terrorist acts on the territory of the United States and beyond its borders, at U.S. military and civilian locations," Putin said.
CNN.com - Russia 'warned U.S. about Saddam' - Jun 18, 2004

You have a couple of neighbors telling ya that some assclown in your area is buying a shit load of guns/ammo and then have another one, which is a friend of the assclown, state that the assclown is out to kill ya what do ya do?


You make sure it is true before you act. That's exactly what you fucking do.


I always love it when something comes out against the lefts agenda they blame the source on Fox News.

Against the left's agenda? All you proved was that CNN reported the fact that Putin said Iraq were planning to attack us. How is that against the left's agenda? Do we all of a sudden love CNN? I think not. And I wasn't blaming the source on Fox news. It was more of a joke at how only right wing people would ever trust what they heard to be fact on Fox news.



A ground invasion into Iran from this military base? They have a million men in their Basij Militia not to mention their regular forces. Still doesn't make sense

Don't act like the whole invasion would be orchestrated from this point. Of course we would come in via other routes but it would definitely be benefitial to be closer to their border. How can you claim otherwise? Are you saying it would make no difference if the base was all the way on the other side of Iraq?

[Psycho4Bud]

"bail and run." Not quite. Just because we leave somewhere does not mean we're running in fear. In fact if we were to leave it would probably have more to do with the fact that we can't afford this war and that the dollar is becoming increasingly weaker. This type of playground psychology "if we leave we are pussies" mentality is stupid.

What was one of the first things stated by both Saddam and Osama? We didn't have it in us to finish the job.....we'd eventually leave because of the casualties. It's not anyone in here calling us pussies....it's them. They're counting on it.



You make sure it is true before you act. That's exactly what you fucking do.

Reports for other intelligence agencies, Putins report, the U.N. inspectors stating that he was playing a cat and mouse game with the inspection sites.

You'd be screwed in any court with that type of evidence.



Against the left's agenda? All you proved was that CNN reported the fact that Putin said Iraq were planning to attack us. How is that against the left's agenda? Do we all of a sudden love CNN? I think not. And I wasn't blaming the source on Fox news. It was more of a joke at how only right wing people would ever trust what they heard to be fact on Fox news.

Well, the left may not love CNN but CNN definately loves the left. The reason it's against the lefts agenda is because they're trying to make Saddam look like a framed martyr. How did the left win in "06"? "Oh, the war was wrong from the start......."



Don't act like the whole invasion would be orchestrated from this point. Of course we would come in via other routes but it would definitely be benefitial to be closer to their border. How can you claim otherwise? Are you saying it would make no difference if the base was all the way on the other side of Iraq?

Yes I am, in fact, it would be for the best. With the degree of radar and satellite imagery that we have, we would at least have a bit more time for enforcements to arrive. That's if we didn't get bombed to shit.

Have a good one!:s4:

[BathingApes]

Reports for other intelligence agencies, Putins report, the U.N. inspectors stating that he was playing a cat and mouse game with the inspection sites.

You'd be screwed in any court with that type of evidence.

In that case - our judicial system must be pretty dam shitty. Unless you actually believe we did find WMDs but we "haven't reported it due to it being classified" or something like that.



Well, the left may not love CNN but CNN definately loves the left. The reason it's against the lefts agenda is because they're trying to make Saddam look like a framed martyr. How did the left win in "06"? "Oh, the war was wrong from the start......."]


That's a bit of an exaggeration. Hussein was symbol of autocracy, cruelty in Iraq - CNN.com (http://edition.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/meast/12/29/hussein.obit/index.html)

Headline reads "Hussein was a symbol of autocracy, cruelty in Iraq"

Famed martyr? I don't get why he was executed. Why didnt they just put him in prison forever? He would probably have rather died by us than be imprisoned by us. Killing him makes him more of a martyr than throwing him in a prison cell for the rest of his life. Again I'm not defending him just saying it would actually punish him more if he were locked away forever.


Yes I am, in fact, it would be for the best. With the degree of radar and satellite imagery that we have, we would at least have a bit more time for enforcements to arrive. That's if we didn't get bombed to shit.

Why do you think Iran will make the first move on our military bases. I think it's very likely we will act in terms of military well before they do. By that time we will almost definitely have the capability to shoot down any missiles aimed at our bases from a distance, but that isn't likely anyway.

[420_24/7]

Don't tase me bro

[LaidZeppelin]

Just another mixed up American who thinks its all about left, right.....red, blue........... republican, democrat.....autobot, decepticon!!!!! Its not about picking sides for people who think.

[pisshead]

Just another mixed up American who thinks its all about left, right.....red, blue........... republican, democrat.....autobot, decepticon!!!!! Its not about picking sides for people who think.

i know, people have been trained to think it has to be one or the other...only two sides...

it's just absurd!