View Full Version : fat joints vs thin joints
budbuddy420
11-18-2007, 11:04 PM
usually when i get a 20 sac i can roll either 2 fat joints or 3-4 smaller joints , ive had this discussion wiht a few buddys and everyones got different opinions what do u guys think do u feel higher when smoking more joints but same amount of weed.
blueburyboy
11-19-2007, 12:58 AM
why make thin ones thats a sin weed should be smoked like bob did:rastasmoke:
Zcomp
11-19-2007, 01:28 AM
Reputable science shows that only 3-4 hits is all thats necessary to saturate your blood with THC(get high). I always roll small ones for myself and medium size with friends.
blueburyboy
11-19-2007, 02:08 AM
reputable science mean shit the only way is to try your selfe life is all about balls if you dont have the and your a man then your realy fucked
Zcomp
11-19-2007, 03:14 AM
I won't argue the importance of science. But in my own experience, if you need more than 3-4 good hits, your smoking crap.
JstUseDaBong
11-19-2007, 05:08 AM
I won't argue the importance of science. But in my own experience, if you need more than 3-4 good hits, your smoking crap.
Well put:jointsmile:
Rapidfire187
11-19-2007, 05:50 AM
usually when i get a 20 sac i can roll either 2 fat joints or 3-4 smaller joints , ive had this discussion wiht a few buddys and everyones got different opinions what do u guys think do u feel higher when smoking more joints but same amount of weed.
That's all you can roll with a 20 sack? I can roll 2 good sized joints with a $5 sack...
You're either getting some good shit or you're being ripped off.
To answer you question though, I prefer to roll small joints if I'm smoking alone. Sometimes I'll roll a big one for myself, but I usually don't smoke it all in one sitting, I just do it so I don't have to roll another little one later. When smoking with other people I roll a nice fat one...I like to impress my friends, AND get us both fucked up.
GrassMaster
11-19-2007, 02:29 PM
I have found that bigger joints burn off too fast sending more smoke into the air (and being wasted) after each toke than smaller ones. I have foung that if a big one is desired roll it spliff style(cone) for best burning, otherwise a few smaller bones is best, in my book.
usually when i get a 20 sac i can roll either 2 fat joints or 3-4 smaller joints -quote
Do you know how much weight is in one of those $20's? Everyone's idea of a fatty is different. Some people call .5 grammers a fatty, while others call that a pinner, and 1.5 grams is a fatty. If your getting $20 grams 2-3 joints is about right (proper size for me).
Peace
Zcomp
11-19-2007, 06:20 PM
I used to get 20 sacs of reggie that were a 1/5 of an O($120/O). that was in northern mass. I understand that the farther north you go, the more you pay for reggie and the less you pay for good($250-300/O).
Squiggle
11-19-2007, 10:49 PM
That's all you can roll with a 20 sack? I can roll 2 good sized joints with a $5 sack...
You're either getting some good shit or you're being ripped off.
To answer you question though, I prefer to roll small joints if I'm smoking alone. Sometimes I'll roll a big one for myself, but I usually don't smoke it all in one sitting, I just do it so I don't have to roll another little one later. When smoking with other people I roll a nice fat one...I like to impress my friends, AND get us both fucked up.
I agree 100% on this comment.
BudGrower
11-19-2007, 10:57 PM
Small joints is preferable because less wasted smoke between tokes. This new SuperSkunk shit I just harvested is soooo powerful that I don't use my water pipe. I roll a tiny joint with about 3/4 inch margin on each end. Then I cut it in half with a sizzors, right in the middle. Each half has at least 3 big tokes which is more than enough to kick my ass. I save the other half for the next day.
budbuddy420
11-28-2007, 11:34 PM
2 fat joints = 2 grammers and 3-4 is .5-.7 to me .5 is a pinner joint but i agree that to my self i rather roll a pinner and wiht buddys roll fattys and blunts
linearvermin
11-29-2007, 02:33 AM
I won't argue the importance of science. But in my own experience, if you need more than 3-4 good hits, your smoking crap.
Agreed, however, if you want to get REALLY high, which i always do with friends...then we roll a 2g blunt of some bubba kush. Its a killer blunt...and my friends quit about 3/4 the way through and i get the rest to myself which is always nice.
Ganjaboy14
11-29-2007, 03:45 AM
yea its possible to get high with 3-4 hits, but who wants to stay that high? Roll a fattie, pass it around, get blitzed, be happy.
DaZeDShAdOw
11-29-2007, 03:59 AM
ide say skinny joints, the fat ones are kind of a waste if your smoking by yourself but thats just my opinion.
BigDros
11-29-2007, 05:02 PM
alot you guys are tight with your weed and obviously noob smokers 3-4 hits lmao, fat spliffs anytime dont smoke little spliffs and only smoke decent bud 2 not regs or wateva
linearvermin
11-29-2007, 10:17 PM
A nice fat joint of some bubba kush is good for about 4 people to get really high...gota love fat joints! :rastasmoke:
Rapidfire187
11-29-2007, 11:43 PM
usually when i get a 20 sac i can roll either 2 fat joints or 3-4 smaller joints , ive had this discussion wiht a few buddys and everyones got different opinions what do u guys think do u feel higher when smoking more joints but same amount of weed.
I prefer thinner joints, they burn easier IMO and I end up getting higher. With a fat joint I end up feeling like I wasted a lot of the weed.
Schoolboy1
11-30-2007, 03:02 PM
skinny are better u dont waste da weed
:baggy:
:S5:
stay in outer space for life!:S5:
Malsor
12-01-2007, 01:17 AM
i roll thin blunts. i can roll 3 blunts with a gram. better then rolling the whole gram cuz you still get high.
potsmokingnome
12-01-2007, 01:37 AM
Lately I've been accidenbtly rollin bigger joints then I like too lol I really should just re roll them if they turn out too big but I don't and I smoke them and get waaaay too high lol I ussually try to roll smaller joints for myself, and bigger ones for social toking :)
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5 Copyright © 2025 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.