View Full Version : lol! this is why fanboys are stupid.
slipknotpsycho
08-12-2007, 04:21 AM
MAXCONSOLE - Playstation 3 - Boy Arrested For Writing PS3 Sucks On Video Game Cases (http://www.maxconsole.net/?mode=news&newsid=19679)
ganjzilla
08-12-2007, 04:51 AM
wow crazy ass kids whats next?
bluntblaze
08-12-2007, 04:59 AM
he was bored?! what a little jackass if his parents know any better theyll sell his 360 to teach him a lesson.
slipknotpsycho
08-12-2007, 05:00 AM
no even better.... sell his 360 to buy a ps2.... :p
bluntblaze
08-12-2007, 05:09 AM
lmao
KingsBlend420
08-13-2007, 12:13 AM
lol that's hilarious
slipknotpsycho
08-13-2007, 12:46 AM
Ha...
PS3's do suck, though.
again... i wonder why you say that when your system has a 33% failure rate...
are you jealous that we don' thave to send ours in to get them fixed? are you jealous ours is more powerful? or are you jealous your system is the only one left out of motion sensing capability?
Melkane
08-13-2007, 01:41 AM
You'll have to stop quoting that 33% failure rate soon, you know that right? They DID have a 33% failure rate, any new ones in production have the better heat sink in place and therefore do no have the minor issue the old ones have. Therefore with each new 360 produced and each old one that's repaired, the failure rate % goes down. It's probably not even 33% anymore.
slipknotpsycho
08-13-2007, 01:58 AM
yeah, but failure rate is still extremely higher then ps3.... and even when they make a new system, that failure rate was still there....
besides i've decided that's how i'm going to respond to BF everytiem he says ps3 sucks.
slipknotpsycho
08-13-2007, 02:00 AM
Personally, my own 360 hasn't had ANY problems. Also, my system was out a year longer. My system has better games. My system wasn't made by Sony. :jointsmile:
YouTube - Why the PS3 Sucks? 2nd Edition (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f5PsL89oTtE&mode=related&search=)
ok so why have game developers said 360 is running at about max, while they've only begun to tap into ps3's raw power.... hmm...? :jointsmile:
now can we please drop this once and for all... i'm gettin really tired of this 'ps3 sucks' crap... when your system has an admitted by the company huge ass failure rate, then you can talk.
oh and also when ps3 sales drop, and 360 rise back to 'normal' sorry but that sony 130 climb and 360 61 drop speaks for it's self.
slipknotpsycho
08-13-2007, 02:06 AM
Haha, that's bullshit. Even on paper, the PS3 is only slightly more powerful. Anything the PS3 can do, the 360 can do too. Just at slightly worse graphics. I've yet to see a PS3 game put the 360 to shame. Better shape up Sony.
mmhmm....
PS3Blog.net » Blog Archive » PS3 only using 20-25% of its power (http://www.ps3blog.net/2007/01/18/ps3-only-using-20-25-of-its-power/)
ScaryMissMary
08-13-2007, 02:07 AM
Fuck all this playstation talk.
The Wii owns your faaaaaaaace.
:jumphappy:
slipknotpsycho
08-13-2007, 02:08 AM
Fuck all this playstation talk.
The Wii owns your faaaaaaaace.
:jumphappy:
lmao i laugh at that..
:S2::S2::S2:
higher4hockey
08-13-2007, 02:13 AM
slip you sure it wasnt you writing 360 sucks on games?
slipknotpsycho
08-13-2007, 02:21 AM
o.0 no? i'm not petty enough to writing things on shit like that...
and if i did i'd write facts not opinion... like "don't buy a 360, 1 out of every 3 will fail and have to be sent into M$. Instead go for ps3, less than one will fail out of every 100."
Melkane
08-13-2007, 02:22 AM
Power doesn't factor in to game quality...look at lair. But on that same token, Rockstar devs are saying that GTAIV is pushing both systems to their max and they've also stated that both versions will be identical. It's something developers say to make their game seem
like it's "pushing the envelop" moreso than other games. Doesn't mean it's true. PS2 being the second weakest console of last gen (Dreamcast, PS2, GCN, Xbox) took 4 years at least until it's true potential was reached with marvelous looking titles like God of War II, Kingdom Hearts II, Final Fantasy XII, Resident Evil 4. There is tricks developers learn or stumble upon that allow them to continually push more out of a system. I've said before and I'll say it again. PS3 and 360 will always be about the same level, 360 can do a few minor things PS3 can't and PS3 can do a few things 360 can't in the end the games will be about the same on both, with very minor differences. The PS3 has blu ray discs which allow it to hold more data, but it's drawback is a low disc reading speed that will prevent it from really utilizing that storage for any huge impact. All it will allow for is games that would be multi disc on 360 can be one disc on the PS3 and I don't know about you but I never really cared when my games were multiple discs. Hell if anything it somehow added a sense of epicness to have a game be so vast it needed multiple discs.
You keep acting like anyone that doesn't like PS3 must be jealous but frankly I see nothing to be jealous of. I see two consoles that are basically of the same power level but mine being the cheaper in price of the two. I see my console being out first so has a greater lineup of games already out and planned to be out. PS3 is still struggling to get some good big name titles to fill it's library. They will come in time though Sony makes their own good games and they have some help like Square. I see the 360 has the best online service over the proposed "Home" service Sony is discussing. Blu Ray to me was only really useful for those that wish to have Blu Ray movies I'm still working on my DVD collection and really annoyed by all the new formats right now anyway I could stay with DVD for another decade if it was up to me. I don't even care about HDDVD. The tilt function in the PS3 controllers I'm certainly not jealous of, I consider it simply a half assed attempt to combat the Nintendo Wii and frankly if I want that type of gameplay I will buy a Wii which is quite superior to the tech thats in the sixaxis and the games are completely based around it.
slipknotpsycho
08-13-2007, 02:25 AM
Power doesn't factor in to game quality...look at lair. But on that same token, Rockstar devs are saying that GTAIV is pushing both systems to their max and they've also stated that both versions will be identical. It's something developers say to make their game seem
like it's "pushing the envelop" moreso than other games. Doesn't mean it's true. PS2 being the second weakest console of last gen (Dreamcast, PS2, GCN, Xbox) took 4 years at least until it's true potential was reached with marvelous looking titles like God of War II, Kingdom Hearts II, Final Fantasy XII, Resident Evil 4. There is tricks developers learn or stumble upon that allow them to continually push more out of a system. I've said before and I'll say it again. PS3 and 360 will always be about the same level, 360 can do a few minor things PS3 can't and PS3 can do a few things 360 can't in the end the games will be about the same on both, with very minor differences. The PS3 has blu ray discs which allow it to hold more data, but it's drawback is a low disc reading speed that will prevent it from really utilizing that storage for any huge impact. All it will allow for is games that would be multi disc on 360 can be one disc on the PS3 and I don't know about you but I never really cared when my games were multiple discs. Hell if anything it somehow added a sense of epicness to have a game be so vast it needed multiple discs.
You keep acting like anyone that doesn't like PS3 must be jealous but frankly I see nothing to be jealous of. I see two consoles that are basically of the same power level but mine being the cheaper in price of the two. I see my console being out first so has a greater lineup of games already out and planned to be out. PS3 is still struggling to get some good big name titles to fill it's library. They will come in time though Sony makes their own good games and they have some help like Square. I see the 360 has the best online service over the proposed "Home" service Sony is discussing. Blu Ray to me was only really useful for those that wish to have Blu Ray movies I'm still working on my DVD collection and really annoyed by all the new formats right now anyway I could stay with DVD for another decade if it was up to me. I don't even care about HDDVD. The tilt function in the PS3 controllers I'm certainly not jealous of, I consider it simply a half assed attempt to combat the Nintendo Wii and frankly if I want that type of gameplay I will buy a Wii which is quite superior to the tech thats in the sixaxis and the games are completely based around it.
no that's not really it... i say those who just say 'ps3 sucks' must be jealous...
slipknotpsycho
08-13-2007, 02:39 AM
so, it hasn't like surpassed 360 so it sucks..
does that mean 360 sucks as well? cuz they are pretty much performing equally....
bluntblaze
08-13-2007, 03:30 AM
I say PS3 sucks because I've yet to see it do anything impressive that the 360 can't do.
so, it hasn't like surpassed 360 so it sucks..
does that mean 360 sucks as well? cuz they are pretty much performing equally....
i detect a fanboy
Spoken Word
08-13-2007, 06:09 PM
so, it hasn't like surpassed 360 so it sucks..
does that mean 360 sucks as well? cuz they are pretty much performing equally....
exactly.
and ps3 is just getting started.
tevnig
08-13-2007, 06:45 PM
both pretty sweet system but i deffinately enjoy the 360 alot more plus all i can say is youll never have halo.
slipknotpsycho
08-13-2007, 07:11 PM
both pretty sweet system but i deffinately enjoy the 360 alot more plus all i can say is youll never have halo.
thank god for that :thumbsup: this is of course my opinion but that game is so shitty i wouldn't even use it to wipe my ass. the first one was fun for about 15 minutes. i won't even get into the 2nd, and i'm sure the 3rd isn't any better.
MadSativa
08-13-2007, 07:13 PM
I got a 360 and I dont even play it any more...Im waiting for PS3 to go down a bit but more imortantly for GTA4 and the new SOCOM to come out. Halo is cool but only the first time you beat it online play is just ok. Id rather play the new Mech warrior for a phantasy shooter, not that halo sucks its just not comparable to other shooter games online. And as it stands I still play PS2 much more than 360 infact when It gets closer for me to buy a PS3 I will probly sell the X-Box to help with the $800 PS3 Bill. But the coolest thing about PS3 is online play is free 360 will never be like that and that is lame
Oh and the Wii is cool my freakin arms are always sore form that dam thing now.
Oh and the kid was defacing proprerty but hes a kid they could have gave him a fine child servises is kinda harsh, what if they took him away from his parents for good after this, might be good might be bad
slipknotpsycho
08-13-2007, 07:35 PM
I got a 360 and I dont even play it any more...Im waiting for PS3 to go down a bit but more imortantly for GTA4 and the new SOCOM to come out. Halo is cool but only the first time you beat it online play is just ok. Id rather play the new Mech warrior for a phantasy shooter, not that halo sucks its just not comparable to other shooter games online. And as it stands I still play PS2 much more than 360 infact when It gets closer for me to buy a PS3 I will probly sell the X-Box to help with the $800 PS3 Bill. But the coolest thing about PS3 is online play is free 360 will never be like that and that is lame
Oh and the Wii is cool my freakin arms are always sore form that dam thing now.
Oh and the kid was defacing proprerty but hes a kid they could have gave him a fine child servises is kinda harsh, what if they took him away from his parents for good after this, might be good might be bad
if you want my advice, get the 20 gig ps3... http://www.gamestop.com/product.asp?product%5Fid=020071
if you want more space, just spend 100 or so on a 120 GIG HDD and put it in yourself (won't void the warranty, and even a moron can do it, sony designed the ps3 so you can put in your own bigger HDD with ease and not void your warranty)
also if you have alot of PS2 games i'd really suggest doing what you can to get it ASAP, the new ps3's will have an EE chip and it's not fully backwards compatible. (i think it's like 80%?)
snowblind
08-13-2007, 07:38 PM
both pretty sweet system but i deffinately enjoy the 360 alot more plus all i can say is youll never have halo.
fucking word
bluntblaze
08-13-2007, 11:24 PM
youll never have halo.well thats a weight off my mind.
id be devastated if such a awfull overrated game was to come to ps3.
i think xbox live wont be such a big thing when home comes out on ps3(free download btw ;)) and since ps3 online is free its even better... you could play a game of bowling or something like that with your friends from the comfort of your very own home.
The Irony of the thread tittle and the posts in here is killing me
bluntblaze
08-13-2007, 11:37 PM
The Irony of the thread tittle and the posts in here is killing me
well no not really.
if you thaught about it you'd realise the only fanboy-ism was from billionfold.
and btw incase your wondering, my post before yours wasnt directed at 360 owners.. it was directed at madsativa, who is going to purchase a ps3 and id assume would want to know about up and coming features.
BlAzInIt4:20
08-14-2007, 05:07 AM
i love the ps3 and i actually think it owns the 360, and the wii :D
the blue ray is off the hook... the internet browser is fast as hell.. and personaly playstation has always been better IMO.
I do like the 360 don't get me wrong but for some reason it just dosnt compare lmao
and to the Halo kid, HALO ROCKS !
I bet one day playstation will make an offer they can't refuse don't speak so soon..
Im with you slip..
slipknotpsycho
08-14-2007, 05:13 AM
I'm a fanboy? You're the one making up entirely new words. Fanboyism, haha.
PS3 is poop.
you just completely ignored my perfectly logical question! he may be a fan boy, but right now you're being one too :p
please answer my question, i'm seriously intrested in your response, shit i've been checking this thread every 10 mins waiting for an answer.
MadSativa
08-14-2007, 05:15 AM
and in 2 years you ll be wanting a PS3 cause more people will be having much more funn.. It is proven history everytime PS releses a new system it is slow untill the game makers get into the new system which is always about 1-2 years. So I expect this next year and the following is going to be sick for games......specialy that new Clancy game war of the world or sumthin like that.
bluntblaze
08-14-2007, 07:14 AM
I'm a fanboy? You're the one making up entirely new words. Fanboyism, haha.
PS3 is poop.
hahaha... this is my responce
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gCVT9lDwPM4
and yes.. you are a fanboy.
bluntblaze
08-14-2007, 11:50 AM
What question?
Meh, if I'm a fanboy, at least I'm the fan of the better system. (Xbox 360)
lmao
psybotbob
08-14-2007, 12:13 PM
It really doesn't matter wich system you like. Both are awesome.
I prefer the Ps3 though. Just because of the controller. And the PSx and PS2 are what made me a gamer. So I'll always stick with Sony.
We will have to wait at least 3 years to see wich system comes out on top. My money is on Sony.
slipknotpsycho
08-14-2007, 05:12 PM
What question?
Meh, if I'm a fanboy, at least I'm the fan of the better system. (Xbox 360)
so, it hasn't like surpassed 360 so it sucks..
does that mean 360 sucks as well? cuz they are pretty much performing equally....
...
bluntblaze
08-15-2007, 12:52 AM
good question
slipknotpsycho
08-15-2007, 02:26 AM
Uh, no. Since they're performing equally, PS3 hasn't shown me anything better than the 360. Xbox 360 is still the all around better system to buy. I'm pretty sure the majority of PS3 purchases were either from Sony fanboys, or Microsoft fanboys who wanted to sell them on ebay to Sony fanboys for a ridiculous amount of cash. :stoned:
you just completely avoided the question, you said ps3 sucks cuz you've yet to see it surpass 360....
and i'm sorry, even if 360 had holographic capabilities it would still not be better then ps3... again, 1 out of every 3 360's will fuck up....
so again, better how? because of games? well, the games are about equal, and considering 360 had a years head start i'd expect it to be far ahead which isn't the case...
so either they both suck, they're both decent systems or you're a fanboy. your pick. but those are the only 3 ways about it.
slipknotpsycho
08-15-2007, 02:44 AM
Of course they're both decent systems. The 360 is just cheaper, easier to develop for, and has better games. I've also not found any links saying the 360 is at it's maximum...
fair enough...
now see tha'ts all i wanted.
CYRAX
08-15-2007, 02:50 AM
i enjoy computer games far more then any console game, flame me if you want, i could really give 2 shits less :)
slipknotpsycho
08-15-2007, 02:51 AM
i enjoy computer games far more then any console game, flame me if you want, i could really give 2 shits less :)
nah i'm a fan of pc games too.... much less limited... usually alot more immersive, plus if it's popular lots of aftermarket mods get made fo rit.
KingsBlend420
08-15-2007, 02:08 PM
I play PC Games and Xbox 360.
360 is by far my favorite atm, but I've played my fair share of PC games.
Xfire - matt (deadhead905) (http://www.xfire.com/profile/deadhead905/)
Melkane
08-15-2007, 04:05 PM
nah i'm a fan of pc games too.... much less limited... usually alot more immersive, plus if it's popular lots of aftermarket mods get made fo rit.
Limited? In what regard? If you are talking about variety, there is far more variety of game genres found in console gaming vs. PC gaming. PC gaming is primarily FPS, RTS, MMO and a few scattered DnD based RPGS. Yes other genres are present but hardly the caliber found on consoles. More immersion? How so? With console titles you can sit back on your comfy sofa with your big screen TV and surround sound system and immerse yourself into that gaming world. Hell a controller especially later models that have rumble/force feedback, triggers and now the wii remote far better act out what you are doing and far better immerse you than sitting up in a computer chair pounding on a keyboard and mouse. I've been playing my share of PC titles as of late but immersion wise it just doesn't compare to the ability console gaming provides.
slipknotpsycho
08-15-2007, 04:10 PM
Limited? In what regard? If you are talking about variety, there is far more variety of game genres found in console gaming vs. PC gaming. PC gaming is primarily FPS, RTS, MMO and a few scattered DnD based RPGS. Yes other genres are present but hardly the caliber found on consoles. More immersion? How so? With console titles you can sit back on your comfy sofa with your big screen TV and surround sound system and immerse yourself into that gaming world. Hell a controller especially later models that have rumble/force feedback, triggers and now the wii remote far better act out what you are doing and far better immerse you than sitting up in a computer chair pounding on a keyboard and mouse. I've been playing my share of PC titles as of late but immersion wise it just doesn't compare to the ability console gaming provides.
they can be bigger, better graphics and a lot more gameplay... they're not limited to what a console can handle or how much they can fit on a disc, my pc alone could handle far more than any console out there right now.
and to me they are more immersive, i don't have a HDTV, so the highest quality screen is my computer screen, it's also where my surround sound is hooked up to.
sorry dude, but pc games are more immersive, since corners don't have to be cut so they can make the whole thing fit on a disc or two...
Melkane
08-15-2007, 04:19 PM
So in your eyes bigger games and somewhat better graphics = More Immersion?
MMO's are usually quite big...but then FFXI is on consoles and it's just as big as any other MMO. I think the argument isn't very sound, especially when consoles now have HDDs and Flash Memory.
slipknotpsycho
08-15-2007, 04:28 PM
it's just my opinion dude, there is no right or wrong answer here... it's all just opinion
Melkane
08-15-2007, 04:53 PM
...of course. Though for immersion I look to the atmosphere of the game, the portrayal of the setting and a good storyline with good scripting/voice acting being the keys to immersion. Eternal Darkness for instance is the prime example. The game isn't very big, and a path of it can be beat in 12 hours or so but it's probably one of the more immersing games in existence.
slipknotpsycho
08-15-2007, 05:44 PM
we probably just have diffrent views on immersion, since i really only play fps's my version is bombs going off everywhere, planes and choppers overhead, soldiers at either side, tanks shaking the ground, bullets flying everywhere, bodies flying.. etc..
just picture what some of the bloodiest battles of WWII would have looked like through the eyes of a soldier.. and tha'ts pretty much it.
it'd be pretty hard to make that onto console, atleast at the level i'm talking about... as it'd eat up the CPU ridiculously quick...
Melkane
08-15-2007, 05:47 PM
Call of Duty series seems to cover that highly well on consoles...
slipknotpsycho
08-15-2007, 05:51 PM
i was never a fan of call of duty... dunno why i just never got into it. and yeah consoles are starting to be able to do it, just look up endwar... but i just got my next gen, i've pretty much been stuck with ps2 for awhile.
CYRAX
08-15-2007, 06:07 PM
Limited? In what regard? If you are talking about variety, there is far more variety of game genres found in console gaming vs. PC gaming. PC gaming is primarily FPS, RTS, MMO and a few scattered DnD based RPGS. Yes other genres are present but hardly the caliber found on consoles. More immersion? How so? With console titles you can sit back on your comfy sofa with your big screen TV and surround sound system and immerse yourself into that gaming world. Hell a controller especially later models that have rumble/force feedback, triggers and now the wii remote far better act out what you are doing and far better immerse you than sitting up in a computer chair pounding on a keyboard and mouse. I've been playing my share of PC titles as of late but immersion wise it just doesn't compare to the ability console gaming provides.
Lol, I got a subwoofer and acouple speakers, my lazy boy recliner, 21 inch lcd screen, and a gaming pad, so I'm perfectly fine without consoles... and graphics mean nothing to me, I'm into classics a matter of fact, diablo 2, tribes 2, and as for as shooters go, counter strike source looks just as good as a ps3 shooter, and there is no console game as realistic as red orchestra when it comes to war gaming, look into it if you don't beleive me. :)
Reefer Rogue
08-16-2007, 07:49 PM
Personally, my own 360 hasn't had ANY problems. Also, my system was out a year longer. My system has better games. My system wasn't made by Sony. :jointsmile:
YouTube - Why the PS3 Sucks? 2nd Edition (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f5PsL89oTtE&mode=related&search=)
This link proves the 360 is superior then the ps3 in my opinion.
The kid should've respected the stores property.
CYRAX
08-18-2007, 12:48 AM
This link proves the 360 is superior then the ps3 in my opinion.
The kid should've respected the stores property.
Wow thanks for that link!
Melkane
08-18-2007, 03:25 AM
Nice youtube link there, very informative. Proves my point that the PS3 will never really surpass 360 with it's games. The PS3 has some impressive looking stats but it's design gimps those nice little stats, bottlenecks them and prevents PS3 from being the powerhouse Sony claims it to be. Sony said originally they were going to support the PS3 for 10 years...I highly doubt that unless Microsoft plans to do the same and considering Microsoft only waited 4 years before replacing the original Xbox, I doubt that will happen.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5 Copyright © 2025 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.