al Qaeda warns Iran

[Psycho4Bud]

Meanwhile, the leader of an al-Qaeda umbrella group in Iraq threatened to wage war against Iran unless it stops supporting Shiites in Iraq within two months, according to a new audiotape. Abu Omar al-Baghdadi, who leads the Islamic State in Iraq, said his Sunni fighters have been preparing for four years to wage a battle against Shiite-dominated Iran.

"We are giving the Persians, and especially the rulers of Iran, a two month period to end all kinds of support for the Iraqi Shiite government and to stop direct and indirect intervention ... otherwise a severe war is waiting for you," he said in the 50-minute audiotape.

In the recording, al-Baghdadi also gave Sunnis and Arab countries doing business in Iran or with Iranians a two-month deadline to cease their ties. "We advise and warn every Sunni businessman inside Iran or in Arab countries especially in the Gulf not to take partnership with any Shiite Iranian businessman â?? this is part of the two-month period," he said.
albawaba.com middle east news information::At least four die in Iraq blasts as al Qaeda warns Iran (http://www.albawaba.com/en/countries/Iran/214889)

Giving the Persians a time line.......LOL, and the 300 stood their ground.:D

Have a good one!:s4:

[Anubis10012007]

Well, thats a good thing??

I mean, the enemy of my enemy is my friend :)

[eg420ne]

Alciaduh ...........

[shaggzx]

This is all fucking stupid. We got ourselves fighting for oil interests and globalization. In order to do that, we needed a "free" American friendly government in Iraq to better control the oil market in the Gulf and also it's the way things have to be for globalization to work. Better flow of the oil market and capitalistic economies. It's all really so these big corporations can have more and everyone else can have less. So fucked up.

[shaggzx]

And another thing. Sorry for the double posts, it's just I forgot the point I was trying to make. We're fighting for the above reasons, the problem is we're fighting people who wanna die. We're fighting people who are so devout that they're completely willing to die for what they believe in. Boy, did we pick the wrong group of people to pick fights with. Thats why we can't win this war. Not without the greater numbers of lives lost anyways. And even then, out will come the next batch of crazy fundamentalists. War will never end. Not even if we didn't have greed and religion feuling wars. People would just find something else to fight about. Damn, people are fucked up beings. We are the only ones that do this shit too.

[Psycho4Bud]

And what does any of that have to do with the conflict of Al-Quada and Iran.......

Have a good one!:s4:

[shaggzx]

Nothing. It's just this stupid war in general. Al-Quada and Iran just stem from it and we all know if shit starts going down in Iran, we'll be pulled into it.

[medicinal]

And what does any of that have to do with the conflict of Al-Quada and Iran.......

Have a good one!:s4:

And you thought Al Queda and Iran were buddies,~LOL~, So if Iran and Al Queda are enemies, shouldn't we be on Irans side, I mean, if we're setting up a Shiite Government in Iraq, And that is exactly what we're doing, shouldn't we be making friends with Iran instead of threatening them with low yield nuclear strikes. This war and the people running it are fucking INSANE.

[PharmaCan]

In order for any of this to make any sense, one has to understand that Saddam's big crime was taking Iraqi oil from the ground. Iraqi oil is supposed to stay in the ground, thereby making oil a much scarcer commodity than it actually is, artificially inflating the price of oil on the world market. (This is historical fact.) Once you get the big picture, this all becomes more clear.

Nevertheless, tribal hostilities can span millenia in that part of the world. It would be an interesting developement if Al Quida started putting their efforts into fighting shiite Iran. Maybe Iran has a lot bigger role in the crap in Iraq than we know about. Whatever the case, it makes a lot more sense for AQ to fight Iran on Iranian territory than in Iraq.

LOL Maybe they figured out that blowing up your own home doesn't really harm your enemy. Ya think?

PC :smokin:

[andruejaysin]

New strategy- Let them fight each other there so we don't have to fight them here. Instead we may well attack iran and force an alliance against us. But GW is the scarecrow president. If he only had a brain....

[Psycho4Bud]

Maybe Iran has a lot bigger role in the crap in Iraq than we know about.

A few of us have been saying that for a while now.....kind of ironic on how al-queda has to bring up an issue though before people start to believe it.

Have a good one!:s4:

[pisshead]

Alciaduh ...........

On Cue, â??al-Qaedaâ?� Threatens Iran Kurt Nimmo (http://kurtnimmo.com/?p=919)
Tuesday, July 10, 2007
For the neocons, â??al-Qaedaâ?� is a dream come true. For instance, the current arch nemesis of the clash of civilizations gang, Iranâ??or rather, the latest target, as the previous target, Iraq, is mired in engineered â??sectarian violence,â?� and other targets, such as Syria, await their turnâ??has supposedly fallen afoul of â??al-Qaeda in Iraq,â?� as the corporate media reports. â??The leader of an al-Qaida umbrella group in Iraq threatened to wage war against Iran unless it stops supporting Shiâ??ites in Iraq within two months, according to an audiotape,â?� the Associated Press would have us believe, mostly because we are suckers for these sort of things. â??Abu Omar al-Baghdadi, who leads the group Islamic State in Iraq, said his Sunni fighters have been preparing for four years to wage a battle against Shiâ??ite-dominated Iran,â?� precisely as their handlersâ??the CIA, Mossad, and MI6â??have planned.
But wait a minute. Didnâ??t the nine eleven whitewash commission conclude that â??al-Qaedaâ?� is in cahoots with Hezbollah and thus Iran? â??In relation to Iran, commission investigators said intelligence â??showed far greater potential for collaboration between Hezbollah and al Qaeda than many had previously thought.â?? Iran is a primary sponsor of Hezbollah, or Party of God, the Lebanon-based anti-Israel group that has been designated a terrorist organization by the United States,â?� the CIAâ??s favorite newspaper, the Washington Post, reported on June 26, 2004, never mind â??ancient animosities between Shiite and Sunni Muslims,â?� an angle mentioned by the Associated Press.
On the one hand, â??al-Qaedaâ?� supposedly declares a hankering to attack Iran, while on the other, according to NewsroomAmerica, â??al-Qaedaâ?� is â??using Iran to organize and launch operations against U.S. and coalition forces in Iraq and elsewhere, western officials sayâ?¦. The Financial Times reports that while the extent of al-Qaeda operations based in Iran isnâ??t clear, it is believed to be taking place with the direct approval of Iranâ??s hardline Islamic government.â?�
Go figure.
Last year, the dead Osama bin Laden told â??Sunnis in Iraq to retaliate against Shiites, deviating from al Qaedaâ??s stand of not promoting sectarian violence,â?� CNN reported. Around the same time, the late Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, the one-legged master terrorist wonder, â??railed against Shiites in a four-hour-long audiotape harangue posted on the Internetâ?� and described as â??an unprecedented screed that chronicled what al-Zarqawi said was a Shiite campaign throughout history to destroy Islam and help foreign invaders of Muslim lands,â?� according to USA Today.
It is precisely this fickle character the neocons love, as Osama and Abu Musab will lash out on cue at Shiâ??ites one day and team up with them the next, never mind purported genocide, betrayal, or bad feelings spanning centuries. Of course, it helps that the commoners, to say nothing of no shortage of senators, are virtual no-nothings when it comes grasping the difference between Sunni and Shia Islam.
A month after the nine eleven whitewash commission made its absurd claim, Iran â??arrested a number of Iranian supporters of Osama bin Ladenâ??s Al Qaeda group,â?� ABC News reported. â??Iran says it has arrested and repatriated hundreds of Al Qaeda suspects in the last two years,â?� likely because they recognize a gaggle of CIA-ISI created patsies and mental patients when they see them. Even though the whitewash commission made sure to implicate Iran, â??they said there was no evidence that Iran helped Al Qaeda with the attacks on the World Trade Centre in New York and the Pentagon in Washington,â?� not that a lackadaisical public is capable of making crucial distinctions, as millions remain convinced Saddam and Osama plotted mayhem and mass murder, mostly because they hate our freedom to jack up the credit card at the local mall.
Of course, as Rick Santorum realizes, the American public is easily swayed by such things, never mind the Brothers Grimm character. â??In an alarming display of fearmongering, former Republican Senator Rick Santorum has suggested that a series of â??unfortunate events,â?? namely terrorist attacks, will occur within the next year and change American citizenâ??s perception of the war,â?� writes Paul Joseph Watson. â??Appearing on the Hugh Hewitt radio show, Santorum also hyped the necessity of â??confronting Iran in the Middle East,â?� and predicted that Giuliani, Romney and Tommy Thompson would be the three surviving Republican candidates who would go head to head in the race for the nominationâ?¦. Santorum went on to clearly imply that terror attacks will occur inside America which will alter the body politic and lead to a reversal of the anti-war sentiment now dominating the country.â?�
Naturally, this â??anti-war sentimentâ?� is not only easy for our â??representativesâ?� to ignore, as the Democrats pandered to it and then ignored widespread antiwar sentiment after the election was over last November, but it will also be easy to reverse with a bit of manufactured terrorism. Moreover, it is no mistake Santorum mentioned terrorism and Iran in the same breath.
So powerful is â??al-Qaeda,â?� we are told the CIA-ISI created terror organization is operating in India. According to B. Raman, writing for Rediff News, â??pro-Al Qaeda jihadi organizations from Pakistan,â?� including Harkat-ul-Mujahideen, Harkat-ul-Jihad-al-Islami, and Lashkar-e-Tayiba, mostly active in the disputed areas of Jammu and Kashmir, are active in India, primarily because of â??Indiaâ??s close relations with the US and Israel. Al Qaeda not only looks upon India as a close associate of the US similar to the UK, but also as providing favorable conditions for its overseas operations directed against US nationals and interests in Indian territory.â?�
Finally, CIA asset Mahmoud Abbas â??said on Monday the Palestinian Islamist movement Hamas is protecting al Qaeda and allowing it to gain a foothold in Gaza,â?� Reuters reports. â??It is Hamas that is protecting al Qaeda, and through its bloody behavior Hamas has become very close to al Qaeda,â?� said Abbas, blaming the phantom organization, or database. â??That is why Gaza is in danger and needs help.â?�
Actually, Gaza is threatened by Israel, currently engaged in a blockade â??threatening to destroy the territoryâ??s commercial sector and drive more people into the hands of extremists,â?� that it to say those resisting occupation. â??In the last three weeks, 75 per cent of Gazaâ??s factories have closed because they are not allowed to import raw material or export finished products, forcing thousands of families to rely on food aid to survive,â?� notes Gisha, an Israeli human rights organization. â??In reality, a policy of collective punishment is being imposed upon 1.4 million people, in violation of international humanitarian law and contradictory to Israelâ??s interest. Destroying Gazaâ??s economy only exacerbates dependence on extreme elements.â?�
Abbas, following his CIA script, signed off on by Olmert, is oblivious to all of this.
But never mind. We have an â??al-Qaedaâ?� epidemic just about everywhere, even Gaza.