View Full Version : Globalists To Formally Propose Merger Of U.S., Canada, Mexico
pisshead
07-06-2007, 04:53 PM
Globalists To Formally Propose Merger Of U.S., Canada, MexicoNorth American Union to be presented to Congress by powerful think tank Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet (http://prisonplanet.com/index.html)
Thursday, July 5, 2007
Globalist political heavyweights are preparing to formally propose to Congress the merger of the U.S., Canada and Mexico into a North American Union at the end of summer after they held secret meetings to devise a plan that will be presented to representatives of all three governments.
"A powerful think tank chaired by former Sen. Sam Nunn and guided by trustees including Richard Armitage, Zbigniew Brzezinski, Harold Brown, William Cohen and Henry Kissinger, is in the final stages of preparing a report to the White House and U.S. Congress on the benefits of integrating the U.S., Mexico and Canada into one political, economic and security bloc," reports World Net Daily (http://wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=55830).
"The data collected for the report is based on seven secret roundtable sessions involving between 21 and 45 people and conducted by CSIS. The participants are politicians, business people, labor leaders and academics from all three countries with equal representation."
The report is entitled "North American Future 2025 Project" (http://www.canadians.org/water/documents/NA_Future_2025.pdf) and was prepared in collaboration with the Center for Strategic & International Studies (CSIS), who were previously instrumental in the passage of the North American Free Trade Agreement in 1994.
The plan outlines an agenda to unify the three countries into a European Union style power bloc.
Security and Prosperity Partnership (SPP) documents (http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=52164) released under the FOIA show that a wide range of US administrative law is being re-written in stealth under this program to "integrate" and "harmonize" with administrative law in Mexico and Canada, just as has become commonplace within the EU.
The documents contain references to upwards of 13 working groups within an entire organized infrastructure (http://www.judicialwatch.org/archive/2006/SPPFOIADocsSecI.pdf) that has drawn from officials within most areas of administrative government including U.S. departments of State, Homeland Security, Commerce, Treasury, Agriculture, Transportation, Energy, Health and Human Services, and the office of the U.S. Trade Representative.
The United States and the European Union have signed up to a new transatlantic economic partnership that will see regulatory standards "harmonized" and will lay the basis for a merging (http://infowars.net/articles/may2007/040507EUUS.htm) of the US and EU into one single market.
18 states have introduced resolutions calling on their federal representatives to halt work on the North American Union (they include Virginia and South Carolina). Three of these states (Idaho, Montana and Oklahoma) have passed their resolutions.
22 U.S. Congressmen, including NC's Virginia Foxx and Walter Jones, along with all three Republican Congressmen running for President, have signed on as co-sponsors of HCR40, which calls on the executive branch to end all work on the North American Union and NAFTA superhighway.
rainbows.rsexy
07-06-2007, 05:24 PM
heck yeah
the US needs mexi tax revenue
canadian seeds'll be easy to score
PharmaCan
07-07-2007, 05:20 AM
I don't believe this report. I don't think that the globalists have the balls to openly present their plans to congress.
I truly wish they would. This insidious plot needs to see the light of day. The American people showed what they think of glbalization when we defeated the Senate amnesty.
The same thing would happen to the North American Union plans if they were ever presented to the American (or Canadian) people.
PC :pimp:
birdgirl73
07-07-2007, 02:37 PM
I agree with PharmaCan. I think that story is yet another example of the bogus, paranoiac rantings of PrisonPlanet.
Besides, even if a union were formed--and I do think eventually that will happen--anyone with a brain knows it won't be a "merger" as much as a roundup/grouping of three countries in the same geographical area who rely on one another for products and services and whose economies could be stronger with a closer alliance.
That's far, far away from happening right now. Uneducated conservative nationalist types can't see that such a union wouldn't take away a country's individuality. They just see fear of the unknown. A "merger" of countries and their unique differences hasnt occurred in Europe. Just like the United States of America still allows Texas to be vastly different from, say, Rhode Island.
Anyone who's worked in international business knows that the business world long ago stopped letting national boundaries impede their progress. And I'm convinced that a union approach would be a more sane solution to the U.S. immigration problem and to our border security issues.
Oneironaut
07-07-2007, 04:42 PM
Globalist political heavyweights are preparing to formally propose to Congress the merger of the U.S., Canada and Mexico into a North American Union at the end of summer after they held secret meetings to devise a plan that will be presented to representatives of all three governments.
Isn't it amazing that somehow PrisonPlanet always knows about these secret meetings?
"Okay, guys, this is top secret material here! Don't tell anybody. Not your best friend, not your mother, not your wife. Well, except for that kook with the conspiracy website. You can tell him."
pisshead
07-07-2007, 06:06 PM
hmmm, i'm going to guess that no one that replied has read the North American Future 2025 Project pdf...or the Security and Prosperity Partnership (SPP) documents (http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=52164)
but i appreciate opinions based on ignorance...but if people want an EU style unelected unaccountable north American government...all one has to do is nothing...
Oneironaut
07-08-2007, 02:58 AM
Doesn't this thread belong in the Conspiracy forum? Secret meetings to create a continental supergovernment, who have released public documents detailing their top secret plans and put them on the Internet in convenient PDF format for the public to read...sounds like a nonsensical conspiracy theory to me.
eg420ne
07-08-2007, 03:06 AM
hmmm, i'm going to guess that no one that replied has read the North American Future 2025 Project pdf...or the Security and Prosperity Partnership (SPP) documents (http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=52164)
but i appreciate opinions based on ignorance...but if people want an EU style unelected unaccountable north American government...all one has to do is nothing...
well they cant never provide proof of other wise, just post non-sense that dont make sense...im still waiting on sum1 to provide proof on the government official theory of 911....hell the NAU is widely known fact but to these people it has to be run on Foxnews to be fact
eg420ne
07-08-2007, 03:27 AM
Oh By the way, thank Gawd, that we have a nice peace loving government that does no wrong at the helm, cause i sure dont want to be part of a nation that goes nation grabbing anytime it feels like it:)
i take on allcomers...come 1 come all.................
cannabis=freedom
07-08-2007, 03:29 AM
If this is true, my friends who say I'm just an anti-American paranoiac will have to eat their words!!
(Anti-American government, foreign policy, everything high up; nothing against average citizens, especially those who toke).
cannabis=freedom
07-08-2007, 03:37 AM
I agree with PharmaCan. I think that story is yet another example of the bogus, paranoiac rantings of PrisonPlanet.
Besides, even if a union were formed--and I do think eventually that will happen--anyone with a brain knows it won't be a "merger" as much as a roundup/grouping of three countries in the same geographical area who rely on one another for products and services and whose economies could be stronger with a closer alliance.
That's far, far away from happening right now. Uneducated conservative nationalist types can't see that such a union wouldn't take away a country's individuality. They just see fear of the unknown. A "merger" of countries and their unique differences hasnt occurred in Europe. Just like the United States of America still allows Texas to be vastly different from, say, Rhode Island.
Anyone who's worked in international business knows that the business world long ago stopped letting national boundaries impede their progress. And I'm convinced that a union approach would be a more sane solution to the U.S. immigration problem and to our border security issues.
Heyhey, I'm neither uneducated nor a conservative, and I believe that NAFTA has crippled Canadian autonomy, and people are supposedly proposing we go even further? Canada signed a trade agreement with a nation that, while it does supply a lot of trade (although virtually any trading bloc could do that), the rules are constantly bent when they are not convenient, most notably in the infamous softwood lumber dispute. If you don't like having no tariffs, then don't sign an agreement! You can't backpedal later and say "Well, yeah, we did promise, but this isn't very fitting for our interests at this time..."
Yeah, whenever Canada has a close trading partnership it consists of this: valuable Canadian resources go out, less comes in.
eg420ne
07-08-2007, 03:44 AM
This government and the ones b4 it are not working for the american people, they work for the Corporate America and with buddies like SA and Israel them plans are on full speed ahead... someday(like now) will have to cut them off...prove me wwwwrrrrrrrrrrong
Zimzum
07-08-2007, 03:52 PM
well they cant never provide proof of other wise, just post non-sense that dont make sense...im still waiting on sum1 to provide proof on the government official theory of 911....hell the NAU is widely known fact but to these people it has to be run on Foxnews to be fact
Its just a copy / paste war with twoofers. Any article that debunks the debunker's is seen as a neoconic government report sponsored by Israel. You say we wont listen but at the same time the same is said about you. Instead of being a buzzkill on a pothead forum why not go debate this over in JREF's conspiracy forums (http://forums.randi.org/forumindex.php)? They will give you what you are looking for here.
pwn3dy0
07-08-2007, 08:56 PM
WorldNetDaily reported it too WorldNetDaily: North American union plan headed to Congress in fall (http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=55830)
This is offically the end of the country. They will de-value the dollar even more, completey socialize and destroy the country......and alot of you denying the elephant in the living room will love them for it..
eg420ne
07-08-2007, 11:29 PM
Its just a copy / paste war with twoofers. Any article that debunks the debunker's is seen as a neoconic government report sponsored by Israel. You say we wont listen but at the same time the same is said about you. Instead of being a buzzkill on a pothead forum why not go debate this over in JREF's conspiracy forums (http://forums.randi.org/forumindex.php)? They will give you what you are looking for here.
Hey dud have you finish the 911 report, bet you didnt even buy it, why dont you go to that whatever website you sought for me and stay there:cool:
onequestion
07-08-2007, 11:47 PM
Doesn't this thread belong in the Conspiracy forum? Secret meetings to create a continental supergovernment, who have released public documents detailing their top secret plans and put them on the Internet in convenient PDF format for the public to read...sounds like a nonsensical conspiracy theory to me.
You are so fucking stupid. It's not a conspiracy because it isnt hidden at all. Anybody that wants to know about this thing can easily confirm that it's true. You dont know about it because the big media otlets choose not to report on it because of their government ties. I mean all the big channels are owned by viacom or Gm or something else. A conspiracy theory means that somebody THINKS that something is going on, it is fact when you have papers written and signed by the people involved.
eg420ne
07-09-2007, 01:18 AM
Exactly comrade
PharmaCan
07-09-2007, 01:25 AM
Bird Girl - You misunderstood what I said. The NAU is a fact. It is on a fast track to becoming operative.
I just don't think the bastards in our government have any intention of making their objectives public any time soon.
Anyone who doubts the NAU needs to do a lot of reading. You can go here (http://www.alamoalliance.org) and follow the links. You'll learn everything you need to know and you'll also see links to official us.gov websites which detail the progress and the objectives of the SPP (Security and Prosperity Partnership for North America).
And be sure to read the section on the NAFTA Superhighway.
This is not conspiracy. This is fact that is documented on government websites.
...and why do they want an NAU? To provide an unlimited supply of cheap labor, which drags down wages for all of us and makes corporate profits soar.
The issue is much too complicated for a few remarks on a forum. If you want to know the truth, read!
PC :pimp:
PharmaCan
07-09-2007, 01:35 AM
Heyhey, I'm neither uneducated nor a conservative, and I believe that NAFTA has crippled Canadian autonomy, and people are supposedly proposing we go even further? Canada signed a trade agreement with a nation that, while it does supply a lot of trade (although virtually any trading bloc could do that), the rules are constantly bent when they are not convenient, most notably in the infamous softwood lumber dispute. If you don't like having no tariffs, then don't sign an agreement! You can't backpedal later and say "Well, yeah, we did promise, but this isn't very fitting for our interests at this time..."
Yeah, whenever Canada has a close trading partnership it consists of this: valuable Canadian resources go out, less comes in.
Did you know that UPS is suing Canada, specifically, your postal service, for unfair competition under NAFTA rules. Seems all your mailboxes and post offices give your postal service an unfair advantage over UPS, under NAFTA rules, and they want the playing field leveled.
But it's not just the trade agreements. Canada has a culture, just like the US has a culture. We are being forced to accomodate third-world trash in the name of diversity, and this third-world trash comes to our countries with no intention of assimilating - only of forming ethnic enclaves and continuing their third-world existence and their third-world mentalities, except with a better infrastructure - which of course they rapidly destroy.
PC :pimp:
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5 Copyright © 2025 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.