pisshead
04-06-2007, 06:00 PM
Osama Or The Easter Bunny?
Who will be paying us a visit this weekend?
Steve Watson
Infowars.net (http://infowars.net/index.html)
Friday, April 6, 2007
CENTCOM has reliably informed us that The Easter Bunny's appearance this year may be upstaged by that of Goldstein himself, the back from the dead Osama Bin Laden.
On 4 April, a "jihadist" website carried the following posting:
"After a long absence by the shaykh of mujahidin, whom we have missed as well as his speeches, some news is being leaked indicating that Shaykh Usama Bin Ladin, God protect and preserve him and make him a thorn in the throat of the enemies, will make an appearance. The news indicates that Al-Sahab Media Establishment, which specializes in publishing Al-Qa'ida leaders' speeches, has recently finished producing a video featuring Bin Ladin's speech to the entire Islamic nation. "
Furthermore, the poster of this note maintains that the speech includes several messages to the "mujahidin" in Iraq, the Palestinian People on " the capitulation choice which HAMAS gave in to," the Riyadh Arab summit, the "fears" of America and its allies of the establishment of the Islamic Caliphate state in Iraq, and the "good tidings of victory in Iraq and Afghanistan."
But which Osama will it be? The fat nosed Bin Laden, the fuzzy blurry Bin Laden or the regurgitated cobbled together Bin Laden medley?
With a great deal of 9/11 truth activity and significant breakthroughs into the mainstream media over the last month, it would certainly do for those who wish to send Americans back to sleep to remind everyone who they are supposed to point the finger at and what they are supposed to think with regards to the war on terror.
We have previously covered the scores of times (http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/january2006/200106Bin_Laden_Tape.htm) Osama Bin Laden has been used as a tool of fear and control as a tried and tested method whenever the going gets tough. Many tapes have been determined to be total fakes (http://www.prisonplanet.com/bin_laden_tape_a_fake_swiss_lab_says.htm) by voice analysis or simply re-hashes (http://www.prisonplanet.com/120903binladentape.htm) of old material.
In February Professor Bruce Lawrence, head of Duke University??s Religious Studies program and a leading expert on Osama Bin Laden, went on the record to say that he believes the so called "9/11 Confession" tape, released shortly after the attacks, is an outright fake that has been used by US intelligence agencies to deflect attention from ??conspiracy theories? about 9/11.
Research led us to discover that the most recent "Al Qaeda" video releases featuring Bin Laden had already featured in a docudrama (http://infowars.net/articles/October2006/031006faketerror.htm) The Road to Guantanamo. The media tentatively even admitted that it was the government that released the tapes.
In a separate revelation, AP reported (http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/October2006/031006Atta.htm) that an expert on Islamic extremism deemed the Al Qaeda footage as so out of character for al-Qa'ida it could have been taken by a security agency.
Bin Laden was created by US intelligence , worked with US intelligence in the late 70s and 80s, was used as a patsy by US intelligence before and after 911 and is now being used as a manipulative tool of fear by the criminal elite faction currently in power in the US.
In June 2006, Muckraker Report investigative reporter Ed Haas contacted the FBI to ask why 9/11 was not specifically mentioned on Bin Laden's wanted page (http://www.fbi.gov/wanted/topten/fugitives/laden.htm) on the FBI website.
??The reason why 9/11 is not mentioned on Usama Bin Laden's most wanted page is because the FBI has no hard evidence connecting Bin Laden to 9/11," he was told Rex Tomb.
In Bin Laden's first interview after the 9/11 attacks he denied any involvement (http://www.robert-fisk.com/usama_interview_ummat.htm). This isn't like a kid caught thieving in a sweet shop - terrorists always claim responsibility for attacks they have perpetrated otherwise why bother killing people to send a political message?
Then came the now thoroughly debunked "Confession Tape".
The fact that the FBI does not consider the 'confession tape' as reliable evidence of involvement in 9/11 was subsequently completely dismissed by the Washington Post and others (http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/august2006/280806binladen.htm) who still say the tape proves that Al-Qaeda have, "proudly taken responsibility for the hijackings."
Who will be paying us a visit this weekend?
Steve Watson
Infowars.net (http://infowars.net/index.html)
Friday, April 6, 2007
CENTCOM has reliably informed us that The Easter Bunny's appearance this year may be upstaged by that of Goldstein himself, the back from the dead Osama Bin Laden.
On 4 April, a "jihadist" website carried the following posting:
"After a long absence by the shaykh of mujahidin, whom we have missed as well as his speeches, some news is being leaked indicating that Shaykh Usama Bin Ladin, God protect and preserve him and make him a thorn in the throat of the enemies, will make an appearance. The news indicates that Al-Sahab Media Establishment, which specializes in publishing Al-Qa'ida leaders' speeches, has recently finished producing a video featuring Bin Ladin's speech to the entire Islamic nation. "
Furthermore, the poster of this note maintains that the speech includes several messages to the "mujahidin" in Iraq, the Palestinian People on " the capitulation choice which HAMAS gave in to," the Riyadh Arab summit, the "fears" of America and its allies of the establishment of the Islamic Caliphate state in Iraq, and the "good tidings of victory in Iraq and Afghanistan."
But which Osama will it be? The fat nosed Bin Laden, the fuzzy blurry Bin Laden or the regurgitated cobbled together Bin Laden medley?
With a great deal of 9/11 truth activity and significant breakthroughs into the mainstream media over the last month, it would certainly do for those who wish to send Americans back to sleep to remind everyone who they are supposed to point the finger at and what they are supposed to think with regards to the war on terror.
We have previously covered the scores of times (http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/january2006/200106Bin_Laden_Tape.htm) Osama Bin Laden has been used as a tool of fear and control as a tried and tested method whenever the going gets tough. Many tapes have been determined to be total fakes (http://www.prisonplanet.com/bin_laden_tape_a_fake_swiss_lab_says.htm) by voice analysis or simply re-hashes (http://www.prisonplanet.com/120903binladentape.htm) of old material.
In February Professor Bruce Lawrence, head of Duke University??s Religious Studies program and a leading expert on Osama Bin Laden, went on the record to say that he believes the so called "9/11 Confession" tape, released shortly after the attacks, is an outright fake that has been used by US intelligence agencies to deflect attention from ??conspiracy theories? about 9/11.
Research led us to discover that the most recent "Al Qaeda" video releases featuring Bin Laden had already featured in a docudrama (http://infowars.net/articles/October2006/031006faketerror.htm) The Road to Guantanamo. The media tentatively even admitted that it was the government that released the tapes.
In a separate revelation, AP reported (http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/October2006/031006Atta.htm) that an expert on Islamic extremism deemed the Al Qaeda footage as so out of character for al-Qa'ida it could have been taken by a security agency.
Bin Laden was created by US intelligence , worked with US intelligence in the late 70s and 80s, was used as a patsy by US intelligence before and after 911 and is now being used as a manipulative tool of fear by the criminal elite faction currently in power in the US.
In June 2006, Muckraker Report investigative reporter Ed Haas contacted the FBI to ask why 9/11 was not specifically mentioned on Bin Laden's wanted page (http://www.fbi.gov/wanted/topten/fugitives/laden.htm) on the FBI website.
??The reason why 9/11 is not mentioned on Usama Bin Laden's most wanted page is because the FBI has no hard evidence connecting Bin Laden to 9/11," he was told Rex Tomb.
In Bin Laden's first interview after the 9/11 attacks he denied any involvement (http://www.robert-fisk.com/usama_interview_ummat.htm). This isn't like a kid caught thieving in a sweet shop - terrorists always claim responsibility for attacks they have perpetrated otherwise why bother killing people to send a political message?
Then came the now thoroughly debunked "Confession Tape".
The fact that the FBI does not consider the 'confession tape' as reliable evidence of involvement in 9/11 was subsequently completely dismissed by the Washington Post and others (http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/august2006/280806binladen.htm) who still say the tape proves that Al-Qaeda have, "proudly taken responsibility for the hijackings."