Log in

View Full Version : Incredible tongue-in-cheek, right-wing B.S. about Canada.



Herbaholic00
12-13-2004, 09:39 PM
This is funny


http://www.hugi.is/hahradi/bigboxes.php?box_id=51208&f_id=1211

Peace

Torog
12-14-2004, 12:38 PM
This is funny


http://www.hugi.is/hahradi/bigboxes.php?box_id=51208&f_id=1211

Peace
Howdy Herbaholic,

Thanx for the link,I always enjoy and appreciate,what Ann Coulter has to say,I watched that particular segment and I cheered her on.. as for the CNN segment,I'm left with the question..just how many Canadians do have a dog-sled team ?

Have a good one...Torog :D

PS: I don't hate Canada or Canadians..even though,many Canadians, hate America and Americans..after all-we have the 'gall'-to say NO to terrorists..it's become politically-correct-for the Left and euroweenies,to percieve terrorists.. as 'freedom fighters and insurgents"..not as the inhuman beasts that they are.

pisshead
12-14-2004, 04:51 PM
you've bee propagated nicely, we've got to get those subhuman evil muslim terrorists, just like those subhuman jews, right? those scourges of society.

you don't even know who the real enemy is, as you cheer on the destruction of the republic. how does an internal passport system like rome or russia or nazi germany keep you safe? who stands to gain from the terror? or does destroying the constitution not really matter, as long as we git those evil muslims...

you have no clue what happened on 911, and it doesn't matter to you, just as long as you're told what the new group to hate and bomb is...and it doesn't even bother you.

you're not a christian or a conservative, and that's sad to see you so brainwashed.

why don't you tell me how the terrorists did this to building 7?
http://www.prisonplanet.com/011904wtc7.html

did the terrorists force silverstein to take out massive insurance policies and then put explosives in the building...did they profit from it? who did? can a few small fires melt the steel evenly enough to make it fall perfectly to the ground in a symettrical fashion. up until that day, no modern steel structure had ever fallen because of fire (buildings have burned for days and not collapsed), on that day, three did that day.

and how does a building disintegrate in mid air as it falls? you can see the charges going off on the side of the building, did the terrorists do this?
how can this not even matter to you?

you better have a damn good answer if you want to use this as an excuse to take over sovereign countries and steal their opium and oil...so what is it?

mr chinnery
12-14-2004, 06:04 PM
Anyone with an interest in this hilarity should go to http://ourworld-top.cs.com/mikegriffith1/refute.htm and laugh at people who believe in conspiracy theories. "up until that day, no modern steel structure had ever fallen because of fire". Wow, that has to be the biggest generalisation i have ever heard. I'm no architect, (or phycisist for that matter) but common sense dictates that when steel gets hot enough (being a metal and all) it will bend and melt. If that steel happens to be holding a building up then the building would collapse, surely?.I don't think it was a few small fires that caused the buildings to collapse, but a large plain full of fuel. When fuel burns it gets very hot pisshead, and maybe the heat from that fuel caused the steel to melt! It's a crazy theory I know...

pisshead
12-14-2004, 06:14 PM
what temperature does jet fuel burn? what temperature does steel melt?

how do you explain building 7 that wasn't hit by an airplane, but comes down in a perfectly symettrical manner?

the owner is on video saying that they made decision to pull the building, and then they watched it fall. that means controlled demolition. when you 'pull' a building, you bring it down by well placed explosives, it's a science.

i guess that's just a theory though.

after all, there have never ever been any conspiracies in history ever. powerful people have never tried to get more power and control...keep dreaming.

i provided the link of the owner saying that, but don't watch it, please.

pisshead
12-14-2004, 06:23 PM
the oldest firefighting magazine in the country has also said the official version of 911 is a lie, add them to your conspiracy theory list.

also add the firefighters who have been ordered by the feds not to talk about what they know, as well as FBI and CIA who have come forward saying the official story is a lie.

then again, a 5 year old should be able to deduce it's a big fabrication, and that there's more to the story than 19 evil freedom hating hijackers...

all you have to do is see the collapse of building 7, from any angle you can find (i've seen 6 or 7) and you can figure out that fire alone did not make that building do that. it's so obvious.

the owner said they decided to pull it, and then they watched it fall...doesn't that mean anything? you can't wire a building to be pulled in 8 hours.

i better just stop thinking about it and start hating the muslim freedom haters i guess, as we get our internal passports and the pan american union.

Herbaholic00
12-15-2004, 09:40 PM
A number of little-noticed provisions greatly expand the government's policing power and in effect broaden the USA Patriot Act.


In the weeks following President Bushâ??s reelection, the White House lobbied hard to push through a sweeping bill to reform to the countryâ??s intelligence community. The legislation won congressional approval last week and is expected to be signed by the President within days..............http://www.gnn.tv/headlines/headline.php?id=426

mr chinnery
12-16-2004, 02:47 PM
Pisshead: OK, I misunderstood your original statement there Pisshead. I still have problems with some of your arguments. "FBI and CIA who have come forward saying the official story is a lie". I'd like to read this press release, please forward me to somwhere I can read it."the oldest firefighting magazine in the country has also said the official version of 911 is a lie, add them to your conspiracy theory list." Well this magazine seems to hold some authority in America, what other bombshells have they dropped lately? Cat rescued from tree? I bet the delusional conspiracy theory issue improved circulation no end...It seems most of your evidence is hearsay, at best."powerful people have never tried to get more power and control...keep dreaming." That's not what I'm saying, I'm all for capitalism and making money. I'm not saying there have never been conspiracy theories but like the supposed hoax of the moon landings and JFK, they all have a rational explanation. But rather than wait for one, you believe whatever ill informed 'journalists' you read on the net.

pisshead
12-16-2004, 05:31 PM
i like how you throw around the phrase conspiracy theory, while you believe in the biggest conspiracy theories of them all...the magic bullet, the 19 evil freedom hating muslim terrorist hijackers...such is the nature of doublethink however.

look up on google: john o'neill WTC, david schippers (top link), robert wright FBI (top links)...

www.tomflocco.com has extensively covered 911 as well, look for the stuff about sibel edmonds (she hit the tip of an iceberg)

i'm sorry this isn't reported and thrown in your face like the scott peterson case. i guess it's kind of like the way hitler didn't announce he was building concentration camps to haul people away and start mass extermination.

i've gone over 911 with hundreds of people over the past few years when i started studying it, and i just don't have the energy anymore.

here's something on building 7, that wasn't hit by a plane, but collapsed in a perfectly symmetrical manner at around 5pm on 9/11/01...how does this fit into the 19 hijacker theory? the owner, as you'll see, admits they decided to pull the building, then watched it fall. if you know anything about controlled demolitions, you can't set that up in 9 hours.

http://www.prisonplanet.com/011904wtc7.html

http://boards.cannabis.com/showthread.php?t=4650

also, if you care, watch matrix of evil, the police state series (pre 911 stuff is interesting) from that link right above.

mr chinnery
12-16-2004, 06:07 PM
"I'm not saying there have never been conspiracy theories but like the supposed hoax of the moon landings and JFK, they all have a rational explanation". How is that admission of believing these theories? I don't believe them because they have been explained away. Surprisingly enough, I don't know anything about controlled demolitions, but I shall read the *ahem* expert opinions (yours included) that are out there on sites such as prisonplanet.com...I have to say I'd never heard of Scott Peterson before you mentioned him.
Concerning building 7, you believe it was pulled rather than caused by fires. Fair enough. Do you believe everything else on prisonplanet about 9/11. The pod missile theory?

pisshead
12-16-2004, 06:53 PM
alex jones doesn't push the pod thing, only what's provable.

small fires can't make a building fall perfectly to the ground, the owner is on video admitting they pulled the building. if you've seen controlled demolitions before, pulling means controlled demolition, and they fall almost exactly like building 7 did. or they can fall in whatever direction you want them to.

i've seen the building fall from half a dozen or so angles, and it's perfect, absolutely perfect. you don't set that up in 1/3 of a day.

how fortunate for him he got the multi billion dollar insurance payout. he got the policy at the right time i guess.

mr chinnery
12-19-2004, 07:30 PM
He believes in the new world order, he can't give a shit about what's proveable.

pisshead
12-19-2004, 08:21 PM
you can look up new world order and see congressman and scholars and elite family members nearly a hundred years ago talking about it...

president bush, sr. said it over 200 times during his term in office...

i guess they're nut jobs too...

or they're allowed to say and it's normal? but others can study it and they're crackpots? is that it?

pisshead
12-19-2004, 09:16 PM
anyone, type ..."new world order" quotes...into google.

mr chinnery
12-19-2004, 11:11 PM
I took your advice and searched pisshead. http://www.amerikanexpose.com/quotes1.html was an interesting site with lots of quotes taken out of context to support the modern, paranoid delusion of the new world order. Really conclusive. Try http://skepdic.com/illuminati.html

Sedater18
12-20-2004, 12:22 AM
I hate that stupid bitch

pisshead
12-20-2004, 08:19 PM
wow, you pick one site to discredit all sites...

good job. there are plenty of documented quotes out there, but then again, you seem to have no discernment.

mr chinnery
12-24-2004, 02:42 PM
The thing is, that site does pretty much discredit the whole idea of the new world order, illuminati conspiracies etc. So yeah it disproves any ideas promulgated by paranoid websites. I agree with you that there are plenty of quotes that have the worlds 'new world order' in them, but that doesn't mean to say they support the modern paranoid idea of new world conspiracies. It seems that you are the one who can't discern between fact and propaganda.

thecrackbaby
01-02-2005, 01:07 AM
Didnt you hear? Bush is a satanic socialist! He just pretends to be a right wing jesus freak. Personally i would vote for a satanic socialist, i think thats better. Pisshead is such a nut that its funny

mr chinnery
01-02-2005, 07:40 AM
Crackbaby voting for Bush!? You heard it here first.